Originally posted by dj43:Originally posted by BayToBrazil:Originally posted by Niners99:Originally posted by GoldBrick:PFF is WACK.
That said, the young guys have been dang impressive. I've been high on Brunskill since the preseason. He generates a ton of movement in the run game and has shown that he can be effective at guard as well.
What are you basing that on?
It's based on a system that analyzes every football website and NFL article to deliver grades, stats, and rankings for the internet. He goes beyond traditional stats with metrics and dozens of other performance stats.
Just messing around GoldBrick. Actually I think a lot of people feel your frustration. But PFF seems to be the best (although still imperfect) option we have.
PFF has two levels. Edge gives basic player grades in two or three categories, depending on the position. It is a very good tool for general ratings and rankings. If you want to spend the money for their Elite/Premium product, you get some very advanced, very cool stuff. Virtually every serious football writer uses their stuff.
The PFF positives outweigh the PFF negatives for me. I haven't subscribed to the elite product but it's great everytime I have had any access.
McGlinchey had some low grades this year IIRC. Does anyone know what he rated at per game vs Brunskill?