LISTEN: Are The 49ers Done? →

There are 299 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:

You know, if you just want to take over this whole thread from here on out, I'll happily oblige.


Those are eye opening statistics.

There are a few things that really stood out to me. Joe Burrow was good enough under pressure to make the SB. We all pretty much knew that. Mac Jones was actually pretty solid under pressure. Big Ben and Tom Brady aren't what they used to be.

The 41.3% pressure rating on Jimmy is disappointing. I don't remember if Trent was hurt in the Dallas game or not, but I think he played more than one post season game hurt? Anyway, that 41.3% can't happen in the playoffs - if the 49ers want to have a shot at the 🏆'th Lombardi.

Trent played well in both the DAL and GB game. He was credited with 1 pressure in each game which was slightly above his regular season average. Tom Compton and Laken Tomlinson both gave up 9 pressures each. Daniel Brunskill gave up 5 and Alex Mack gave up 3.

I think in this particular game, Trey's mobility would have been a factor in helping that pressure rate. The rams had Von coming in from the edge and Donald coming in from the interior. That's going to give any OLine problems. When the 49ers played NY Giants and Lawrence Taylor in the NFCCG - Joe's mobility really did help a lot to neutralized Lawrence Taylor's pass rush.

Not on the pressure rate % stats. Only on what he does after he's pressured.

Trey...Jimmy...Montana...Young...you don't want ANY 49ers QB pressured that much.

Until I see how they grade the stats, I'm skeptical. A lot of these advanced stats are too subjective in my view. Point is, the 41% pressure rate, how is that actually graded and differentiated from a (for example) blitz vs a missed handoff on a tackle/end twist? Jimmy was pretty high up there when blitzed QB ratings-wise, but then he's pressured and his numbers drop drastically? I do know that Trent was injured, and so the OLine is limited in sliding the protections one way or the other with a one legged Trent. Add in the fact that the Ram's DLine was a one time bought and paid for mercenary DLine unlike the 49er DLine, and I have a lot of salt I'm depositing for these so called stats.

Pressure rate isn't super hard to determine. There is going to be a tad subjectivity in it though.

Start with only passing downs. Then, is he moved off his spot? And when? Under 3s or over 3s? Does it force him to speed up his delivery, throw early, scramble, rush up through a hole, side step, shuffle, etc.?

Pretty much any duress under some operational definition on time. Then after that point, it's on the QB...not on the OL.

Moved off his spot - does the mobility of the QB matter? I would think a defensive coordinator will blitz a mobile QB less than an pocket QB due to the escapability dimension. Also line stunts and dogs are not a rush containment strategy and a mobile QB can escape through the cracks in a rush containment strategy.

No, I would guestimate an evaluator would simply look at 2, 3, 5 and 7 step drops. If he's altered in any way within the drop back, that's a pressure. If he's on a designed role out, PA, etc. same concept. If he has to alter his path, that's a pressure.

Under 3 or Over 3 - Pass blocking sets, I think, differ between under 3 yards to pass vs longer passes that have to go over 3. I.e. 3 step slants vs 5 step drops, vs 7 step drops and play actions. Those are all different kinds of pass blocking sets. If your Left Tackle is injured, I'm assuming that skews the pressure rates a bit from a normal pressure rate.

Totally. That's why I would think they'd have a clicker for each drop back for 2, 3, 5, 7 and PA. Getting a pressure on a slant would be incredibly challenging. Injuries don't factor into the stat itself. A pressure is a pressure. Like the TW and McKivitz example. It's still 5 either way. 1 just happens to be as a result of an injury and the other, a talent issue.

QB Ratings - are affected by the defensive backs and defensive coverage. Guys like Deion limited QB ratings to his side sub 70%, and guys like Donte Johnson - actually elevate a QB's ratings + 100%

So again, a lot of these statistics are interesting, but I take them with a heavy truckload of salt.

Tight DB coverage can absolutely affect pressure rates. It forces the QB to hold it longer or he's hesitating and indecisive. Like play calling can too; longer developing plays take longer so the PP has to hold. We actually have a distinct advantage since we rely on 2.5s passes for RAC where the Rams have to hold to 2.8s for more intermediate passes.

That said, pressures are simply tallied either way. A pressure is a pressure is a pressure and the correlation to success and failure is a tried and true correlation since the dawn of time, I would imagine.
Hard to judge the Oline right now with no pads. They can't protect themselves, They are at a huge disadvantage. And let's be honest, Nobody is blocking Bosa with no pads.
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Hard to judge the Oline right now with no pads. They can't protect themselves, They are at a huge disadvantage. And let's be honest, Nobody is blocking Bosa with no pads.

Ole'!
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Hard to judge the Oline right now with no pads. They can't protect themselves, They are at a huge disadvantage. And let's be honest, Nobody is blocking Bosa with no pads.

Nobody blocks him with em either.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by JTB1974:
Hard to judge the Oline right now with no pads. They can't protect themselves, They are at a huge disadvantage. And let's be honest, Nobody is blocking Bosa with no pads.

Nobody blocks him with em either.

Facts!

Originally posted by NYniner85:


According to pff, he graded really well as a pass blocker and graded decent as a run blocker. He gave up 1 sack, 1 hit and 8 hurries last season. Someone previously said it was health reasons but if he has started 16 games each over the last 5 seasons, health and durability don't seem to be an issue. I wonder why the 49ers didn't sign him as soon as Mac retired?
[ Edited by YACBros85 on Jul 29, 2022 at 5:09 AM ]
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NYniner85:


According to pff, he graded really well as a pass blocker and graded decent as a run blocker. He gave up 1 sack, 1 hit and 8 hurries last season. Someone previously said it was health reasons but if he has started 16 games each over the last 5 seasons, health and durability don't seem to be an issue. I wonder why the 49ers didn't sign him as soon as Mac retired?

No idea. Perfect vet signing…knows the scheme and isn't gonna cost a billion dollars.

I'm sure health plays a part (he never practices because he's banged up), but it would be a massive upgrade imo. I wanted them to sign Tretter when he was a FA coming from GB.

Honestly it's the one position that I'm truthfully worried about on the OL. Center is important for this scheme.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by YACBros85:
According to pff, he graded really well as a pass blocker and graded decent as a run blocker. He gave up 1 sack, 1 hit and 8 hurries last season. Someone previously said it was health reasons but if he has started 16 games each over the last 5 seasons, health and durability don't seem to be an issue. I wonder why the 49ers didn't sign him as soon as Mac retired?

good luck trying to get an objective answer on that one
Originally posted by cciowa:
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is

When it comes to offense personnel, I am looking at Kyle. If it were the defense, you might have a point.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is

When it comes to offense personnel, I am looking at Kyle. If it were the defense, you might have a point.

so you are fine with the solution they came up to replace mack as compared to going out being proactive and find the best center on the first day of free agency. sure of course i hope this kid will be the answer... but i am not willing to take that risk with trey behind him... i loved lynch was proactive and got a very very good corner but this center thing is hard to figure out in my opinion
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is

When it comes to offense personnel, I am looking at Kyle. If it were the defense, you might have a point.

so you are fine with the solution they came up to replace mack as compared to going out being proactive and find the best center on the first day of free agency. sure of course i hope this kid will be the answer... but i am not willing to take that risk with trey behind him... i loved lynch was proactive and got a very very good corner but this center thing is hard to figure out in my opinion

No. You completely misunderstood what I posted. I am saying you are placing the blame on the wrong person.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is

When it comes to offense personnel, I am looking at Kyle. If it were the defense, you might have a point.

so you are fine with the solution they came up to replace mack as compared to going out being proactive and find the best center on the first day of free agency. sure of course i hope this kid will be the answer... but i am not willing to take that risk with trey behind him... i loved lynch was proactive and got a very very good corner but this center thing is hard to figure out in my opinion

No. You completely misunderstood what I posted. I am saying you are placing the blame on the wrong person.
sorry, got it. you are right,, kyle should be concerned about this. i get that many people say that kyle runs the show.. but i guess i am old school and think if he is a gm. then lynch is the head of the rattlesnake and then i look at some of the deals he has handed out like dee ford and jimmy and some of the draft picks he has blown.. well... i get your point. i still have more faith in kyle than i do in lynch
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by cciowa:
of course they will sign a vet for a problem area.. we would rather experiment with some guy off the street in a key spot behind trey. and please do not start with. he is a injury risk... hello!! have you not followed lynch? signing or drafting hurt guys with red flag injuries is something he loves to do.. so why not take a chance on a guy who would be a upgrade to what we have. sorry,, i am not among those dazzled by his gold or yellow jacket or whatever the hell color it is

When it comes to offense personnel, I am looking at Kyle. If it were the defense, you might have a point.

so you are fine with the solution they came up to replace mack as compared to going out being proactive and find the best center on the first day of free agency. sure of course i hope this kid will be the answer... but i am not willing to take that risk with trey behind him... i loved lynch was proactive and got a very very good corner but this center thing is hard to figure out in my opinion

No. You completely misunderstood what I posted. I am saying you are placing the blame on the wrong person.
sorry, got it. you are right,, kyle should be concerned about this. i get that many people say that kyle runs the show.. but i guess i am old school and think if he is a gm. then lynch is the head of the rattlesnake and then i look at some of the deals he has handed out like dee ford and jimmy and some of the draft picks he has blown.. well... i get your point. i still have more faith in kyle than i do in lynch

When it comes to contracts, I don't think that Kyle has much to do with that aspect. When it comes to his offense though, he is fully responsible for the team he fields.
Share 49ersWebzone