LISTEN: Are The 49ers Done? →

There are 207 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Haha. You'd be the best defense lawyer ever! I just showed two perfect evidence examples above and you just instantly moved the jury off them both.

Whereas I linked to a post where you said exactly what I said you said and you tried to spin what you wrote. Hell I could post the corresponding response where you pat yourself on the back being right about the OL. No point did you say Jimmy or the DB's were also responsible. So we don't buy your hedging now. If you are honest about it with 49erATT blame pie you'd give 90% to the OL. Just own it.

Let me break it down simply again. The OL has never been "good enough" in my mind. What they have been is good enough to win a SB because SB's are won by teams and not individual units. The rest of the team could've made up for their problems if Jimmy just hits Sanders. That's the reality. Hoov and NY would agree.

There was nothing to spin. The claim by NY (and you) was that I said the "OL was the only" reason we lost the Superbowl. Which was absolutely absurd and it shows how you create your own reality and see what you want to see in here. Hoov with the example on Brunskill too just now. LOL

But whatever. You 3 seem far more interested in what I said 4 years ago (which was accurate then too) than actually bringing something to the topic.
[ Edited by NCommand on Jul 29, 2022 at 10:58 AM ]
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Hard to tell from just looking at him.

Right? I hope he had a boy. And I hope we draft him.

I like how the OLine is developing Trent Williams, Banks, Brendel, Beuford, (McGlincy/Moore?)

Brendel, Burford, and whoever is RT - looks like they can move, then you have power on the left with Williams and Banks.

You do? Love the enthusiasm and faith.

It could end up great or a freaking nightmare. Who knows. I don't think there will be much in between though.

Get the pads on. Let's see some 1on1 videos. Then 7x7 and 11x11. And then practices against another team. Then pre season games.

Then we should be in a good spot on how we feel and what to expect.

Of course! Of course! It's a long way until the final product is assembled. But I like the combo power and movement elements that are developing. Trey is going to boot to the right more times than the left, and I can see the RB's running to Trent's side a lot, and Bank's looks a bit like Laken in terms of ability. The OLine better be in shape because if I'm Kyle - I'm installing a ton of scramble drill plays!

Trey's arm is going to force defenses to drop deep, and Trey's speed is going to force LB's to come up and contain - that means the RB's will be open all day. Hope our RB's have soft hands (I know Trey Sermon and Mitchell already do).
Originally posted by NCommand:
There was nothing to spin. The claim by NY (and you) was that I said the "OL was the only" reason we lost the Superbowl. Which was absolutely absurd and it shows how you create your own reality and see what you want to see in here. Hoov with the example on Brunskill too just now. LOL

But whatever. You 3 seem far more interested in what I said 4 years ago (which was accurate then too) than actually bringing something to the topic.

Because it is what you said. "Not prioritzing the O LIne cost us the SB IMHO". Black and White.

If you want us to buy this new "everything is to blame" then do your own blame pie. How much was the OL to blame last year? I said mine in the other thread. So did 49ATT.
[ Edited by 9ers4eva on Jul 29, 2022 at 11:05 AM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Lol. The dudes who don't even read what I wrote 1 page back talking about my reality. Cute.

You writing it a page ago doesn't all of a sudden wipe out what you've said for years. That's not how it works.

anyway back to talking about the OL.

Show me where I said the OL was the only reason we lost. Where I implied that and nothing else.

The fact that 9ers4eva is even attempting that is comical given he knows for a fact I've been 100% on board with his concerns about DB too. That show you he's got a narrative or trying to troll here.

You and Hoov? Your claims just ended up being wrong...then you doubled down and lost again. No biggie.

We're wrong about a million things in the WZ. Admit it and move on.

he blamed that all on the OL
[ Edited by NCommand on Jul 29, 2022 at 11:06 AM ]
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
There was nothing to spin. The claim by NY (and you) was that I said the "OL was the only" reason we lost the Superbowl. Which was absolutely absurd and it shows how you create your own reality and see what you want to see in here. Hoov with the example on Brunskill too just now. LOL

But whatever. You 3 seem far more interested in what I said 4 years ago (which was accurate then too) than actually bringing something to the topic.

Because it is what you said. "Not prioritzing the O LIne cost us the SB IMHO". Black and White.

If you want us to buy this new "everything is to blame" then do your own blame pie. How much was the OL to blame last year? I said mine in the other thread. So did 49ATT.

Of course it did. LOL. That's not saying it was THE ONLY reason why. LOL
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Hard to tell from just looking at him.

Right? I hope he had a boy. And I hope we draft him.

Only if Trent's wife was an Olympic Sprinter or gymnast.

Haha. Trent is fast enough!
So what have you been wrong about in the WZ NC?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So what have you been wrong about in the WZ NC?

Nothing
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So what have you been wrong about in the WZ NC?

He called Brunskill a Guard instead of a Tackle.
Apparently Aaron banks had had a good camp thus for. Love to hear that
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Apparently Aaron banks had had a good camp thus for. Love to hear that

Here's hoping we were both wrong on him too NY with our concerns on his skillset translating.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Apparently Aaron banks had had a good camp thus for. Love to hear that

I ain't buying it
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
I ain't buying it

Poe can't play all 5 positions at once
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
I ain't buying it

Poe can't play all 5 positions at once

I know Trent Williams will be the LT
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:

You know, if you just want to take over this whole thread from here on out, I'll happily oblige.


Those are eye opening statistics.

There are a few things that really stood out to me. Joe Burrow was good enough under pressure to make the SB. We all pretty much knew that. Mac Jones was actually pretty solid under pressure. Big Ben and Tom Brady aren't what they used to be.

The 41.3% pressure rating on Jimmy is disappointing. I don't remember if Trent was hurt in the Dallas game or not, but I think he played more than one post season game hurt? Anyway, that 41.3% can't happen in the playoffs - if the 49ers want to have a shot at the 🏆'th Lombardi.

Trent played well in both the DAL and GB game. He was credited with 1 pressure in each game which was slightly above his regular season average. Tom Compton and Laken Tomlinson both gave up 9 pressures each. Daniel Brunskill gave up 5 and Alex Mack gave up 3.

I think in this particular game, Trey's mobility would have been a factor in helping that pressure rate. The rams had Von coming in from the edge and Donald coming in from the interior. That's going to give any OLine problems. When the 49ers played NY Giants and Lawrence Taylor in the NFCCG - Joe's mobility really did help a lot to neutralized Lawrence Taylor's pass rush.

Not on the pressure rate % stats. Only on what he does after he's pressured.

Trey...Jimmy...Montana...Young...you don't want ANY 49ers QB pressured that much.

Until I see how they grade the stats, I'm skeptical. A lot of these advanced stats are too subjective in my view. Point is, the 41% pressure rate, how is that actually graded and differentiated from a (for example) blitz vs a missed handoff on a tackle/end twist? Jimmy was pretty high up there when blitzed QB ratings-wise, but then he's pressured and his numbers drop drastically? I do know that Trent was injured, and so the OLine is limited in sliding the protections one way or the other with a one legged Trent. Add in the fact that the Ram's DLine was a one time bought and paid for mercenary DLine unlike the 49er DLine, and I have a lot of salt I'm depositing for these so called stats.

Pressure rate isn't super hard to determine. There is going to be a tad subjectivity in it though.

Start with only passing downs. Then, is he moved off his spot? And when? Under 3s or over 3s? Does it force him to speed up his delivery, throw early, scramble, rush up through a hole, side step, shuffle, etc.?

Pretty much any duress under some operational definition on time. Then after that point, it's on the QB...not on the OL.

Moved off his spot - does the mobility of the QB matter? I would think a defensive coordinator will blitz a mobile QB less than an pocket QB due to the escapability dimension. Also line stunts and dogs are not a rush containment strategy and a mobile QB can escape through the cracks in a rush containment strategy.

No, I would guestimate an evaluator would simply look at 2, 3, 5 and 7 step drops. If he's altered in any way within the drop back, that's a pressure. If he's on a designed role out, PA, etc. same concept. If he has to alter his path, that's a pressure.

Under 3 or Over 3 - Pass blocking sets, I think, differ between under 3 yards to pass vs longer passes that have to go over 3. I.e. 3 step slants vs 5 step drops, vs 7 step drops and play actions. Those are all different kinds of pass blocking sets. If your Left Tackle is injured, I'm assuming that skews the pressure rates a bit from a normal pressure rate.

Totally. That's why I would think they'd have a clicker for each drop back for 2, 3, 5, 7 and PA. Getting a pressure on a slant would be incredibly challenging. Injuries don't factor into the stat itself. A pressure is a pressure. Like the TW and McKivitz example. It's still 5 either way. 1 just happens to be as a result of an injury and the other, a talent issue.

QB Ratings - are affected by the defensive backs and defensive coverage. Guys like Deion limited QB ratings to his side sub 70%, and guys like Donte Johnson - actually elevate a QB's ratings + 100%

So again, a lot of these statistics are interesting, but I take them with a heavy truckload of salt.

Tight DB coverage can absolutely affect pressure rates. It forces the QB to hold it longer or he's hesitating and indecisive. Like play calling can too; longer developing plays take longer so the PP has to hold. We actually have a distinct advantage since we rely on 2.5s passes for RAC where the Rams have to hold to 2.8s for more intermediate passes.

That said, pressures are simply tallied either way. A pressure is a pressure is a pressure and the correlation to success and failure is a tried and true correlation since the dawn of time, I would imagine.

Well yes, a pressure is a pressure, but sometimes a pressure is designed. Those RPOs - have a designed guy unblocked. When it works, it usually works great. When it doesn't then it looks like a pressure - but it was intended vs accidentall.

My simple point is that arguing stats are nice, and they are valid measurements of performance, but you have to be careful of what you are measuring. Sometimes its addressing the question of "are you seeing what I'm seeing?" But more often than not its addressing the question "WHY aren't you seeing what I'm seeing."

Anyway, I'd join PFF if I had to money too. I'm just too cheap.😉😛😋

I didn't want this one to get lost in the sharks. It is shark week. LOL

That's a good question about RPO's. I would imagine it wouldn't matter unless it's a moving mesh point. On the move decision to hold it and throw or hand off. For instance, if he's sliding to the right he's behind the RG and RT and may even get outside before deciding to throw. I have no idea how PFF grades the 'OL' for that. The designed movements for any QB could complicate grading a pressure and makes it harder to tease out the OL responsibility from the design/QB decision.

I think most aren't as hung up on the operational definitions here because it wouldn't apply to JG and the OL last year. Not many RPO's or designs that would be harder to grade.

The biggest take aways were the regular season vs. post season splits, us compared to the other 13 teams in the playoffs and the strong correlation to how pressure affects QB performance. And none of that should have been too much of a surprise for any 49er fan.
Share 49ersWebzone