Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Thought all the injuries to the team were related to soft training?
McVay sure trains his guys hard by never playing them.
There are 189 users in the forums
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Thought all the injuries to the team were related to soft training?
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
This entire season rest's on an undrafted center, and Dan Brunskill, what could go wrong?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Like our injury history, this isn't even debatable, bro.
Kyle puts a ton on his OL, RB's and TE's.
If I were to list the number of OL, RB, and TE's who've taken snaps here in this system d/t injury since Kyle arrived, it would be an insanely long list. It's not like Kyle subs these guys out for poor performance. LOL
If you DON'T think that's scheme (volume/complexity)-related, explain your theory.
Correlation does not equal causation.
So if we tweak the scheme to match the Rams instantly the injuries go away?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Thought all the injuries to the team were related to soft training?
McVay sure trains his guys hard by never playing them.
Originally posted by NCommand:
So you have no theory. After 6 years.
Just a coincidence, right?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Giedi:
I'm expecting improvements in the health department, personally. They played *two* preseason games on AstroTurf, and didn't have any significant injuries - I think - Other than Ward. *who's always injured* anyway. They had some hammy pulls and I think Hurst tore a peck or something. But I think that's a good sign for the upcoming season. Last season they had several serious injuries and Jeff Wilson was pretty much out for the season at this time last year, in a sense. Just by this preseason alone, I think they have done an excellent job of increasing team durability via culture and workout ethic (at least I hope so). Poe is a workout warrior, and so is Zakelj, for example.
No more Kentavius Street, Jimmy is a backup now, Kemoco Turay is on the PS vs the 53 (he has a history of injuries), etc... their emphasis on durability, I think is paying off.
Durability is always one hit away from flipping on its head.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So you have no theory. After 6 years.
Just a coincidence, right?
No theory is better than one that makes no logical sense
Originally posted by NCommand:we should go through how each of those injuries have happened to really find out
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So you have no theory. After 6 years.
Just a coincidence, right?
No theory is better than one that makes no logical sense
So there's a strong longitudinal correlation to this system eating through OL, TE's and RB's but it's not logical enough for you to make a causation or come up with an alternate correlation theory.
Got it.
Originally posted by YACBros85:even if the numbers show no difference .. we should break it down
Its obvious we have gone through a lot of O lineman in the past 6 years. But how does it compare to other regimes around the NFL? If we don't have numbers to actually compare than it is nothing more than an assumption that we go through them at a higher rate.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Its obvious we have gone through a lot of O lineman in the past 6 years. But how does it compare to other regimes around the NFL? If we don't have numbers to actually compare than it is nothing more than an assumption that we go through them at a higher rate.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Its obvious we have gone through a lot of O lineman in the past 6 years. But how does it compare to other regimes around the NFL? If we don't have numbers to actually compare than it is nothing more than an assumption that we go through them at a higher rate.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by YACBros85:even if the numbers show no difference .. we should break it down
Its obvious we have gone through a lot of O lineman in the past 6 years. But how does it compare to other regimes around the NFL? If we don't have numbers to actually compare than it is nothing more than an assumption that we go through them at a higher rate.
like TE, do we blame the scheme for Kittles injuries ?
Originally posted by NCommand:it is a secret.. could you explain how exactly the scheme injures players ? maybe choose a player and go over it ? i brought up kittle
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Its obvious we have gone through a lot of O lineman in the past 6 years. But how does it compare to other regimes around the NFL? If we don't have numbers to actually compare than it is nothing more than an assumption that we go through them at a higher rate.
The theory wasn't in comparison to other teams. It was noting this system here. There's no secret this system here eats through OL, TE's and RB's.
Even QB's. But that's another topic. Haha.