Originally posted by NCommand:
At 99 (or 87), there were only a handful of T's and IOL taken. Adding to a talent pool can never hurt (see also, DL, LB, S, WR, etc.).
Nice dodge of the question.
There are 366 users in the forums
Originally posted by NCommand:
At 99 (or 87), there were only a handful of T's and IOL taken. Adding to a talent pool can never hurt (see also, DL, LB, S, WR, etc.).
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
This is a weird hill to die on lol
It was a top 5-10 pass blocking line last year via the metrics depending where you looked. Nothing to die on. I expect a FA added to the mixt and something similar this year.
I was expecting them to add a OT or two. Kinda bummed out given the guys there. I don't think our OL stinks or whatever.
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
At 99 (or 87), there were only a handful of T's and IOL taken. Adding to a talent pool can never hurt (see also, DL, LB, S, WR, etc.).
Nice dodge of the question.
Originally posted by NCommand:Agree with NC. IMO, Shanahan's pride in proving he can win with an average (or below average) OL will be the main reason if he continues to fail to win a SB.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
This is a weird hill to die on lol
It was a top 5-10 pass blocking line last year via the metrics depending where you looked. Nothing to die on. I expect a FA added to the mixt and something similar this year.
I was expecting them to add a OT or two. Kinda bummed out given the guys there. I don't think our OL stinks or whatever.
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face.
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
This is a weird hill to die on lol
It was a top 5-10 pass blocking line last year via the metrics depending where you looked. Nothing to die on. I expect a FA added to the mixt and something similar this year.
I was expecting them to add a OT or two. Kinda bummed out given the guys there. I don't think our OL stinks or whatever.
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face.
Lol what?
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Originally posted by NCommand:Agree with NC. IMO, Shanahan's pride in proving he can win with an average (or below average) OL will be the main reason if he continues to fail to win a SB.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
This is a weird hill to die on lol
It was a top 5-10 pass blocking line last year via the metrics depending where you looked. Nothing to die on. I expect a FA added to the mixt and something similar this year.
I was expecting them to add a OT or two. Kinda bummed out given the guys there. I don't think our OL stinks or whatever.
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face., But a guy picked at 99 would prevent that?
At 99 (or 87), there were only a handful of T's and IOL taken. Adding to a talent pool can never hurt (see also, DL, LB, S, WR, etc.).
15 is a little more than a handful last I checked bud.
Given there's 400 OL, yeah, not that deep into the pool. LOL. It certainly didn't stop the other teams from adding.
Why didn't the 49ers take an O-lineman? For the very reason that we stated a little bit ago.
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 29, 2023
Shanahan: "There wasn't one there who would fit."
Lynch: "We weren't going to take one just to take one."
Lynch says that the 49ers not taking an O-lineman is "very much" a vote of confidence in Colton McKivitz, the favorite to start at RT
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 29, 2023
Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
Why didn't the 49ers take an O-lineman? For the very reason that we stated a little bit ago.
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 29, 2023
Shanahan: "There wasn't one there who would fit."
Lynch: "We weren't going to take one just to take one."
Lynch says that the 49ers not taking an O-lineman is "very much" a vote of confidence in Colton McKivitz, the favorite to start at RT
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 29, 2023
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Our OL doesn't suck by any means. It's just going to get punked in the playoffs unless something magical happens. And it could...just playing the odds on the current talent level and who we're likely to face., But a guy picked at 99 would prevent that?
At 99 (or 87), there were only a handful of T's and IOL taken. Adding to a talent pool can never hurt (see also, DL, LB, S, WR, etc.).
15 is a little more than a handful last I checked bud.
Given there's 400 OL, yeah, not that deep into the pool. LOL. It certainly didn't stop the other teams from adding.
Last year the 16th, 17th and 18th linemen taken were all drafted in round 3. None played a single OL snap.
So how is taking an OL at 99 going to assure our OL doesn't get punked in the playoffs?
Originally posted by Paul_Hofer:
Agree with NC. IMO, Shanahan's pride in proving he can win with an average (or below average) OL will be the main reason if he continues to fail to win a SB.