There are 196 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Lions? Goff is a tier 1 QB now?

Well what matters more? You've said the Chiefs wont win because of their OL. Ready to make the same statement about the Lions in reverse?

I should just set up a signature:

"You need both." ~ NC
before is was you just need 1

but it looks like you don't even know what both is?

I've never said that.

I did say IF you wanted to win one with Garoppolo, because he's a classic pocket passer, a tier 1 OL is an absolute must...but even that doesn't guarantee anything. Why? Because you need both playing at that level through the playoffs. And playoff football in the 4Q was not his bag.
you just admitted to saying that with jimmy, but i digress

now you are talking like a person who watches football with Teams needing to be playing at a high level and none of this Ranking/Tier jargon in your post above



At least your comedy hasn't dropped off!

Hey my fantasy draft cheat sheet has tiers
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
The modern day Superbowl winners have proven having both is the best odds. If there was middle ground every team would be in the hunt. You need both if the you want the best odds.

Granted all the other stuff football is made up of
could derail that as well (injuries, defense, coaching, etc.). Even if you have that.

The teams in the hunt are the ones with the best qbs. If Goff doesn't play at a top 10 level this year it won't matter how good the OL is. Mahomes will always give KC a chance.

Those "best QB's" all fell off a cliff the second they didn't have their tier 1 OL...Brees, Brady, Mahomes, Stafford.

It'll likely happen with PM again this year too because he no longer has that tier 1 OL.

But to your point, he is a first ballot HOF QB so he can certainly help offset more the any other QB in the league. But win it all without his tier 1 OL? Unlikely. I'll go with his own history/patterns.
you know all this talk is about tiers and ranks are just BS ?

you are going off pretty much power rankings

So you don't think SF has a tier 1 DL?
on paper right now without seeing them play, they have a good enough defense to help them go deep in the post season

Tiers is such BS

Is it? Especially when they're reevaluated at mid season and for the post season by subject matter experts?

I can see your stance with PFF (worst rankings ever), ESPN, etc.
all rankings are based on winning, with the last teams ranked higher than others even though they don't have great lines

one example is how you ignore the pressure and what the QB overcame to win

I think you need both, but they don't need to be #1
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Lions? Goff is a tier 1 QB now?

Well what matters more? You've said the Chiefs wont win because of their OL. Ready to make the same statement about the Lions in reverse?

I should just set up a signature:

"You need both." ~ NC
before is was you just need 1

but it looks like you don't even know what both is?

I've never said that.

I did say IF you wanted to win one with Garoppolo, because he's a classic pocket passer, a tier 1 OL is an absolute must...but even that doesn't guarantee anything. Why? Because you need both playing at that level through the playoffs. And playoff football in the 4Q was not his bag.
you just admitted to saying that with jimmy, but i digress

now you are talking like a person who watches football with Teams needing to be playing at a high level and none of this Ranking/Tier jargon in your post above



At least your comedy hasn't dropped off!

Hey my fantasy draft cheat sheet has tiers
i doubt you have tiers of just one or two players
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Lions? Goff is a tier 1 QB now?

Well what matters more? You've said the Chiefs wont win because of their OL. Ready to make the same statement about the Lions in reverse?

I should just set up a signature:

"You need both." ~ NC
before is was you just need 1

but it looks like you don't even know what both is?

I've never said that.

I did say IF you wanted to win one with Garoppolo, because he's a classic pocket passer, a tier 1 OL is an absolute must...but even that doesn't guarantee anything. Why? Because you need both playing at that level through the playoffs. And playoff football in the 4Q was not his bag.
you just admitted to saying that with jimmy, but i digress

now you are talking like a person who watches football with Teams needing to be playing at a high level and none of this Ranking/Tier jargon in your post above



At least your comedy hasn't dropped off!

Hey my fantasy draft cheat sheet has tiers

  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Honestly don't see that from him. The argument is they should always be striving to improve the line to be better, but its one area aside TW they haven't and its now been 7 years of this.

Apparently they wanted to upgrade Center this past offseason, but nothing materialized so they settled back on what we already had. I get it, it happens, but they almost never draft linemen high either. It just seems to be the same routine every year. Our starters are far from terrible, but I am not seeing them invest like they should.

I don't see them drafting OL as very different than the majority of teams. Once you get outside the top 75 picks there isn't this huge difference in talents. I would've like a center too but it is what it is

It's not like DB where the 9ers are the only team in the NFL not to use a 1st or 2nd on a DB via player or trade in the Shanny era.

Also they used a 1 on McGlinchey and 2 on Banks. That is trying. Again if Command would ever argue they aren't succeeding in where they spend their resources that be another issue. But instead he's too busy telling us how great the Rams value their OL two years ago. Now it's the Lions turn. Be someone else in 2 years. Rinse and repeat.

McGlinchey is a big mulligan to me. Not horrible, but certainly not as good as anyone would have hoped, especially in pass protection. Banks looks like a fantastic pick, (who a lot oddly hated at the time) but that's it after 7 years. I like Burford, but he was the 4th round and we need to see more. If they can keep finding late round gems I am all for it, but they've not had nearly the luck on o-line like other areas of the roster.

I didn't even realize that about the DB's. I think they've done well there. Ward was a fantastic signing and the young kids seem to be growing well.

I do fear once we face playoff caliber d lines again it may prove to be our weakness. I would hope they draft some guys high next year, but I wont hold my breath.

Personally I think McGlinchey was more of a Benton pick. Meaning that durability wasn't a high priority during that period of Kyles coaching history. Once he got healthy, I saw some good progress on the pass protection side - then the cap comes in and we can't retain his services, and he leaves. I hate situations like that where just when a good player shows progress, the cap comes in and takes him away.

Banks, Brendal, and Burford look very durable (knock on wood) and hopefully McKivits continues that trend. Having said that, I'd love a talented backup that is young with a 3rd round talent grade Manning the backup OLine positions and on a 2+ year contract with us.

Jalon Moore and Nick Zakelj meet that criteria but they are graded in the lower rounds - talentwise. I'd have loved to have a Banks 2.0 waiting in the wings instead. However I Hope Foerster can work his developmental magic on both Jalon and Nick this season.
Originally posted by NCommand:
I should just set up a signature:

"You need both." ~ NC

So the Lions can't win because of Goff. Need you to say it and not dodge.
Originally posted by NCommand:
I've never said that.

I did say IF you wanted to win one with Garoppolo, because he's a classic pocket passer, a tier 1 OL is an absolute must...but even that doesn't guarantee anything. Why? Because you need both playing at that level through the playoffs. And playoff football in the 4Q was not his bag.

No you've said on multiple occasions thst not investing more in OL cost us multiple superbowls. You havent however said investing tier one money in a non tier one qb has. Wonder why.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I've never said that.

I did say IF you wanted to win one with Garoppolo, because he's a classic pocket passer, a tier 1 OL is an absolute must...but even that doesn't guarantee anything. Why? Because you need both playing at that level through the playoffs. And playoff football in the 4Q was not his bag.

No you've said on multiple occasions thst not investing more in OL cost us multiple superbowls. You havent however said investing tier one money in a non tier one qb has. Wonder why.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So the Lions can't win because of Goff. Need you to say it and not dodge.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
No you've said on multiple occasions thst not investing more in OL cost us multiple superbowls. You havent however said investing tier one money in a non tier one qb has. Wonder why.

It's very possible Tier 2 QB's like Goff and Garoppolo can hit a tier 1 steak through the playoffs and win it all. We've seen that with QB's in the past like Joe Flacco.

The issue here is we've never seen Jimmy play behind a tier 1 OL. So we don't know. Maybe yes, perhaps that would have been the difference in the end.

We're simply talking about giving your QB and play caller the best shot at winning a Superbowl. But you don't seem to be into that. LOL
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So the Lions can't win because of Goff. Need you to say it and not dodge.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
No you've said on multiple occasions thst not investing more in OL cost us multiple superbowls. You havent however said investing tier one money in a non tier one qb has. Wonder why.

It's very possible Tier 2 QB's like Goff and Garoppolo can hit a tier 1 steak through the playoffs and win it all. We've seen that with QB's in the past like Joe Flacco.

The issue here is we've never seen Jimmy play behind a tier 1 OL. So we don't know. Maybe yes, perhaps that would have been the difference in the end.

We're simply talking about giving your QB and play caller the best shot at winning a Superbowl. But you don't seem to be into that. LOL

What about when Peyton Manning won a Super Bowl as a tier D QB with the Broncos?
Originally posted by NCommand:
It's very possible Tier 2 QB's like Goff and Garoppolo can hit a tier 1 steak through the playoffs and win it all. We've seen that with QB's in the past like Joe Flacco.

The issue here is we've never seen Jimmy play behind a tier 1 OL. So we don't know. Maybe yes, perhaps that would have been the difference in the end.

We're simply talking about giving your QB and play caller the best shot at winning a Superbowl. But you don't seem to be into that. LOL

The best way for your QB and playcaller to win a SB is to have your Qb play elite. Like Mahomes just did.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
What about when Peyton Manning won a Super Bowl as a tier D QB with the Broncos?

Must've been that tier 1 OL they had.
So we are clear if you give a tier 2 qb like Jimmy and Jared a tier 1 OL they might be able to win it all but Patrick CANT win the SB this year with his group.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So the Lions can't win because of Goff. Need you to say it and not dodge.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
No you've said on multiple occasions thst not investing more in OL cost us multiple superbowls. You havent however said investing tier one money in a non tier one qb has. Wonder why.

It's very possible Tier 2 QB's like Goff and Garoppolo can hit a tier 1 steak through the playoffs and win it all. We've seen that with QB's in the past like Joe Flacco.

The issue here is we've never seen Jimmy play behind a tier 1 OL. So we don't know. Maybe yes, perhaps that would have been the difference in the end.

We're simply talking about giving your QB and play caller the best shot at winning a Superbowl. But you don't seem to be into that. LOL

What about when Peyton Manning won a Super Bowl as a tier D QB with the Broncos?

Sure, when you have an insane defense like that and the Legion of Sherman, it can happen too.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
So we are clear if you give a tier 2 qb like Jimmy and Jared a tier 1 OL they might be able to win it all but Patrick CANT win the SB this year with his group.

What gives you the best odds?

In the end, is there any real difference between PM with a non-Tier 1 OL or a Flacco, Garoppolo & Goff with a Tier 1 OL??? It's still a possibility for both but what gives you the best odds?
Share 49ersWebzone