There are 237 users in the forums
Originally posted by NCommand:
He played stellar under the pressure. If he could do that through the playoffs and Superbowl, you'll finally have your first example of a QB transcending a challenged OL FTW. We know PM couldn't do it.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Spencer Burford and Jake Brendel had poor performances. Burford giving up 4 pressures with 1 sack. Brendel giving up 3 pressures with 2 hits. McKivitz actually played well it looks like.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Spencer Burford and Jake Brendel had poor performances. Burford giving up 4 pressures with 1 sack. Brendel giving up 3 pressures with 2 hits. McKivitz actually played well it looks like.
Did Ncommand hack your account?!
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Spencer Burford and Jake Brendel had poor performances. Burford giving up 4 pressures with 1 sack. Brendel giving up 3 pressures with 2 hits. McKivitz actually played well it looks like.
Did Ncommand hack your account?!
Why? I don't always have a positive take on the O line. 😅
If you still don't think Brock Purdy is good then you just don't know ballpic.twitter.com/Y6GJfdr0p1
— OutCYde the Lines (@OutCYdetheLines) September 22, 2023
Multiple orgasm
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Why? I don't always have a positive take on the O line. 😅
Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Spencer Burford and Jake Brendel had poor performances. Burford giving up 4 pressures with 1 sack. Brendel giving up 3 pressures with 2 hits. McKivitz actually played well it looks like.
Did Ncommand hack your account?!
Why? I don't always have a positive take on the O line. 😅
they sent cover 0 and cover 1 blitzes every play so we have to take pressure wth a bit of a grain of salt. The OL did a great job at slowing down rushers and gave purdy enough of a pocket to manipulate in order to get the open guy
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Why? I don't always have a positive take on the O line. 😅
hahaha I know. You are good people and conscientious even if we disagree.
Lets hope the right side improves. IMO they improved throughout the game and Giants literally threw everything at them almost every single play. It was crazy, but also a good lesson if anything. I know some plays you will simply get beat as that's football, but I saw a some plays where I could tell the RT missed his assignment or was too slow to get this guy etc.
I hope our d line goes at them like this every single practice.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Overall I will say they played exceptionally well under the circumstances. If the MIA, TB & PIT games haven't deterred defenses from blitzing Brock, this game certainly should.
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
The O line got blitzed 85% of their pass snaps. That doesn't just affect the QB, it also affects the O line. Inspite of the adversity, Brock showed us what it means to elevate a tier 2-3 O line.
He played stellar under the pressure. If he could do that through the playoffs and Superbowl, you'll finally have your first example of a QB transcending a challenged OL FTW. We know PM couldn't do it.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Overall I will say they played exceptionally well under the circumstances. If the MIA, TB & PIT games haven't deterred defenses from blitzing Brock, this game certainly should.
Well I don't know about that….I feel like there were a handful of balls that could have been picked off early. SF got lucky that none of those became TOs.
He settled down and played much better as the game went on.
Overall I think that is something that Brock can become very good at, beating the blitz. All about pre-snap awareness and post-snap anticipation/quick processing…things he's shown he's damn good at with less than a years worth of passing attempts.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Overall I will say they played exceptionally well under the circumstances. If the MIA, TB & PIT games haven't deterred defenses from blitzing Brock, this game certainly should.
Well I don't know about that….I feel like there were a handful of balls that could have been picked off early. SF got lucky that none of those became TOs.
He settled down and played much better as the game went on.
Overall I think that is something that Brock can become very good at, beating the blitz. All about pre-snap awareness and post-snap anticipation/quick processing…things he's shown he's damn good at with less than a years worth of passing attempts.
Brock is 73/119 for 846 yards 6 TD's, 1 INT with a 96.6 passer rating against the blitz in his career.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Overall I will say they played exceptionally well under the circumstances. If the MIA, TB & PIT games haven't deterred defenses from blitzing Brock, this game certainly should.
Well I don't know about that….I feel like there were a handful of balls that could have been picked off early. SF got lucky that none of those became TOs.
He settled down and played much better as the game went on.
Overall I think that is something that Brock can become very good at, beating the blitz. All about pre-snap awareness and post-snap anticipation/quick processing…things he's shown he's damn good at with less than a years worth of passing attempts.
Brock is 73/119 for 846 yards 6 TD's, 1 INT with a 96.6 passer rating against the blitz in his career.
And we all watched the game last night. It was shaky in the beginning. No reason to pretend it wasn't.
Stats don't tell the whole story or we'd all be raving about Lance's amazing QB rating vs LV.
He improved as the game went on and like I said, I think it's something he will be elite at beating the more he plays.
