49ers Offensive Line

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Preach. The beauty behind it is they have a stat for every narrative. Stick to the subject matter experts instead.

Any subject matter expert that thinks that was good pass blocking in the playoffs for the Chiefs should be fired

Speaking of using PFF to make another silly assessment. Right on cue.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Speaking of using PFF to make another silly assessment. Right on cue.

Using my eyes. Don't need people telling me what to think and pretending kc pressures are fine.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Speaking of using PFF to make another silly assessment. Right on cue.

Using my eyes. Don't need people telling me what to think and pretending kc pressures are fine.

LOL. PFF, SME...now the 9ers4eva eye-grade?

How did Philly's 9ers4eva OL eye grade out in that Superbowl in comparison for you?

Originally posted by NCommand:
LOL. PFF, SME...now the 9ers4eva eye-grade?

How did Philly's 9ers4eva OL eye grade out in that Superbowl in comparison for you?

I will trust my eyes over a guy who thinks 3.4 seconds per pass isn't enough.

Still waiting. Eagles and Lions vs the field.

Cowboys have no depth on the O line either. It's like it's a league wide issue.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
LOL. PFF, SME...now the 9ers4eva eye-grade?

How did Philly's 9ers4eva OL eye grade out in that Superbowl in comparison for you?

I will trust my eyes over a guy who thinks 3.4 seconds per pass isn't enough.

PFF 3.4s.

You know I'm just giving you crap.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Cowboys have no depth on the O line either. It's like it's a league wide issue.

True. Most teams aren't super deep and those who are still need many games before those fill ins can show their talent.

Originally posted by NCommand:
PFF 3.4s.

You know I'm just giving you crap.

PFF can tell time. Grading is what's at question

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
LOL. PFF, SME...now the 9ers4eva eye-grade?

How did Philly's 9ers4eva OL eye grade out in that Superbowl in comparison for you?

I will trust my eyes over a guy who thinks 3.4 seconds per pass isn't enough.

PFF 3.4s.

You know I'm just giving you crap.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
PFF 3.4s.

You know I'm just giving you crap.

PFF can tell time. Grading is what's at question

Haha.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Cowboys have no depth on the O line either. It's like it's a league wide issue.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
PFF 3.4s.

You know I'm just giving you crap.

PFF can tell time. Grading is what's at question

Obviously their grading system is just as all over the place as everyone elses. That doesn't take away from the awesome and insightful stats that they track.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Cowboys have no depth on the O line either. It's like it's a league wide issue.

True. Most teams aren't super deep and those who are still need many games before those fill ins can show their talent.

Agree 💯%, and it's a long season. The injury 🐜🕷️ definitely has a say by the end of a long season, as to who gets into the playoffs. It's still early in the season a ton of things can still go haywire.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
There of the first four. Corner is in there as no. 2 for me. What else could be justified within the first 4 picks besides OL and corner? Another DB isn't playing unless you are trying to replace someone. Ditto for receiver and TE. DL? Absolutely not. What other need trumps replacement for Trent, swing tackle, and an IOL (in case Burford isn't the guy)?

Safety as we can't guarantee Huf will he here longterm. Pass rush depth is still important as Farrell won't be here and Beal is unproven.

If the 9ers draft a OT then McKivitz would become the swing if he loses the spot.

9ers need a center more than they do a guard. Let Moore compete at guard with Burford.

1. I can't predict the future, but Huff is going to be here. Unless you are using our first or second pick on a safety, we aren't replacing Huff with anyone we draft there.

2. The reasoning behind two tackles is the first is expected to replace Trent. The other is expected to replace Moore at swing tackle. It takes a few years for Foerster to get these guys where he wants and for once, I'd like us for him to work with some premium day 1 and 2 talent.

3. Center over guard? Eh. I disagree but either way, IOL is needed and again, I'd like Foerster to get some premium talent. We have a FQB to protect and I don't want anything- age or injury to get in the way to keeping him upright.

4. We can get a cheap vet signing every year. If Ferrell walks, it'll be for more money and there will be edge guys waiting to replace him looking to be the next Ferrell, Omenihu, Ebukam, and Key. We do not NEED am edge rusher in the first three rounds over OL.

Looking forward, we'd be well-prepared for Trent retiring as well as having guys acclimated to our system.