49ers Offensive Line

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The O-line clearly is not a problem, we are winning with the line as is.

They've played above average for sure. Quite well. Let's see how we feel after tomorrow night against a playoff team and top defense.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The O-line clearly is not a problem, we are winning with the line as is.

They've played above average for sure. Quite well. Let's see how we feel after tomorrow night against a playoff team and top defense.

Lol at above average

Originally posted by NCommand:
Oh believe me, I've been reading him for years. And how much is to read in a Tier 1 breakdown "...for context." LOL.

Just need power rankings with no breakdown.

Originally posted by NCommand:
He is certainly not playing great ball right now. But that doesn't mean he didn't play great ball previously. Hell, look at Laken Tomlinson. He's a great talent and should bounce back once fully acclimated.

Lot of the good pressures last year.

Same guy he's been. Just doesn't have Pat and Lamar getting away.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
He is certainly not playing great ball right now. But that doesn't mean he didn't play great ball previously. Hell, look at Laken Tomlinson. He's a great talent and should bounce back once fully acclimated.

Lot of the good pressures last year.

Same guy he's been. Just doesn't have Pat and Lamar getting away.

You should at least be consistent in your spin. You don't get top PFF grades in the high 70's and mid 80's because your QB is "mobile."

Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The O-line clearly is not a problem, we are winning with the line as is.

They've played above average for sure. Quite well. Let's see how we feel after tomorrow night against a playoff team and top defense.

Lol at above average

I'd say climbing the ranks of tier 2.

You think they're elite (tier 1)?

I just want your comment FTR.

Originally posted by NCommand:
You should at least be consistent in your spin. You don't get top PFF grades in the high 70's and mid 80's because your QB is "mobile."

You are the only one talking about pff grades. No one here ever has.

Yac talks about their stats not their grades.

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The O-line clearly is not a problem, we are winning with the line as is.

The O-line is a problem. Everything to the right of #71 is a problem. We are winning DESPITE the OL. We are winning because of Trent and Kyle's scheming.

Check the rankings:
Banks is having an off-year. He ranks #53 of 73 Guards.

Burford is still the same guy he was last year - #65 of 73.

Brendel is #28 of 33.

McKivitz is Mike McGlinchey with reverse numbers in run and pass blocking.

---------------

YAC's post about the direction of running plays makes it obvious. We are a left-handed running team because we can't do anything else until improvements are made.

Originally posted by NCommand:
I'd say climbing the ranks of tier 2.

You think they're elite (tier 1)?

I just want your comment FTR.

Plenty good enough to win a SB.

Secondary again looks like the question.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
Oh believe me, I've been reading him for years. And how much is to read in a Tier 1 breakdown "...for context." LOL.

Just need power rankings with no breakdown.

Proof YOU don't read. BT breaks down every OL. You would have picked that up had you read ANY tier 1 link I gave you. Hypocrite.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
I'd say climbing the ranks of tier 2.

You think they're elite (tier 1)?

I just want your comment FTR.

Plenry good enough to win a SB.

Secondary again looks like the question.

I can't make that assessment just yet. Looking forward to the mid season analysis.

Oof. You're not wrong here.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by NCommand:
You should at least be consistent in your spin. You don't get top PFF grades in the high 70's and mid 80's because your QB is "mobile."

You are the only one talking about pff grades. No one here ever has.

Yac talks about their stats not their grades.

LOL

Originally posted by NCommand:
Proof YOU don't read. BT breaks down every OL. You would have picked that up had you read ANY tier 1 link I gave you. Hypocrite.

So what specifically does he say about the 49ers o line behind his paywall?

https://arrowheadguys.com/the-case-for-not-paying-orlando-brown-jr-2/#:~:text=In%20addressing%20Orlando%20Brown%20specifically,Tennessee's%20Dennis%20Daley%20with%2052.

Not expert enough probably though.

Originally posted by dj43:

Originally posted by glorydayz:
The O-line clearly is not a problem, we are winning with the line as is.

The O-line is a problem. Everything to the right of #71 is a problem. We are winning DESPITE the OL. We are winning because of Trent and Kyle's scheming.

Check the rankings:
Banks is having an off-year. He ranks #53 of 73 Guards.

Burford is still the same guy he was last year - #65 of 73.

Brendel is #28 of 33.

McKivitz is Mike McGlinchey with reverse numbers in run and pass blocking.

---------------

YAC's post about the direction of running plays makes it obvious. We are a left-handed running team because we can't do anything else until improvements are made.

Here are a couple historic accounts from BT and PFF.

These peer-ranks look oddly familiar, don't they? As to the OL, ShanaLynch seem to have a very consistent type:

Brandon is one of the best OL evaluators out there, and he's releasing his tiers. Tier 1=elite. Tier 2=very good. Tier 3=good/above average. Tier 4-solid/average 49ers

LT Trent Williams is in Tier 1
Richburg/McGlinchey in Tier 3
Tomlinson/Brunskill in Tier 4