49ers Offensive Line

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
49ers O line pass protection

97 pressures and 8 sacks on 313 dropbacks

Eagles O line pass protection

110 pressures and 22 sacks on 382 dropbacks

Pressure rate

49ers- 31.0%
Eagles- 28.8%

sack rate

49ers- 2.6%
Eagles- 5.8%

Are you saying purdybwas only sacked 4vtimes before tampa bay? That cant be right. Are these stats from pfr?

No. I am not saying that. Not all sacks are charged to an O lineman. In fact the only O lineman who have been charged with sacks this season are McKivitz with 5 and Burford with 3. Our other 12 sacks have either come from a free rusher on a blitz or Purdy escaping the pocket and being brought down just before the LOS.

oh. are you quoting some make believe pff stat that doesn't exist in the real world? The only thing people need to know about our pass pro is the eyeball test watching our guys get steamrolled now and then.

To be fair statistically, we do have good pass pro stats. Top5 in sacks given up (i.e. lower sacks). In my opinion that's much more scheme than talent. Purdy + shanny scheming first option reads to break open in < 2.5s.

We've given up 20 sacks so far.

Made up stat? Sacks are a team stat. So what you are saying is that Juice's sack is also on the O line? GTFOH!

These mystery stats are complicated and inevitably we don't know whos reposnsibility is what, or what should been called at the line.

Pretty useless to speculate about it except in the 49er film room.

Our sack percentage is not so good as our raw numbers.

So what you are saying is if Juice, Kittle or CMC give up a pressure or sack that is a reflection of of the O line? Separating responsibilty is exactly what we do to try and gauge the quality of players. If that is not what you think we should be doing than you should just take yourself right out of this conversation because you just lost all credibility.

If our oline is too confused to slide to a free runner, yea, it's still there problem.

No. Its the systems problem. The system allows free rushers in order to take advantage of the vacancy that those blitzers leave in the secondary. Brock is the highest blitzed QB in the NFL on 45.4% of his dropbacks. 12 of his 20 sacks have come from a blitz. Do you see how many times defenses have crowded the LOS with 6 or 7 could be rushers? The O line has no idea pre snap who is coming and who is dropping into coverage. Its Brock's responsibility in this system to beat the free rusher.

Also, if no one is open and Brock takes off out of the pocket and gets tackled for a sack behind the LOS but outside of the pocket (has happened several times this season), who gets charged for the sack?

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
49ers O line pass protection

97 pressures and 8 sacks on 313 dropbacks

Eagles O line pass protection

110 pressures and 22 sacks on 382 dropbacks

Pressure rate

49ers- 31.0%
Eagles- 28.8%

sack rate

49ers- 2.6%
Eagles- 5.8%

Are you saying purdybwas only sacked 4vtimes before tampa bay? That cant be right. Are these stats from pfr?

No. I am not saying that. Not all sacks are charged to an O lineman. In fact the only O lineman who have been charged with sacks this season are McKivitz with 5 and Burford with 3. Our other 12 sacks have either come from a free rusher on a blitz or Purdy escaping the pocket and being brought down just before the LOS.

oh. are you quoting some make believe pff stat that doesn't exist in the real world? The only thing people need to know about our pass pro is the eyeball test watching our guys get steamrolled now and then.

To be fair statistically, we do have good pass pro stats. Top5 in sacks given up (i.e. lower sacks). In my opinion that's much more scheme than talent. Purdy + shanny scheming first option reads to break open in < 2.5s.

We've given up 20 sacks so far.

Made up stat? Sacks are a team stat. So what you are saying is that Juice's sack is also on the O line? GTFOH!

These mystery stats are complicated and inevitably we don't know whos reposnsibility is what, or what should been called at the line.

Pretty useless to speculate about it except in the 49er film room.

Our sack percentage is not so good as our raw numbers.

So what you are saying is if Juice, Kittle or CMC give up a pressure or sack that is a reflection of of the O line? Separating responsibilty is exactly what we do to try and gauge the quality of players. If that is not what you think we should be doing than you should just take yourself right out of this conversation because you just lost all credibility.

If our oline is too confused to slide to a free runner, yea, it's still there problem.

No. Its the systems problem. The system allows free rushers in order to take advantage of the vacancy that those blitzers leave in the secondary. Brock is the highest blitzed QB in the NFL on 45.4% of his dropbacks. 12 of his 20 sacks have come from a blitz. Do you see how many times defenses have crowded the LOS with 6 or 7 could be rushers? The O line has no idea pre snap who is coming and who is dropping into coverage. Its Brock's responsibility in this system to beat the free rusher.

IIt's hard to say whose fault it is. Is it juices fault? Where the center is fault? Or Purdy's fault? Who knows how the reads and calls are supposed to happen. My opinion is that we get blitz so many times because we have a couple of young guys at guard who don't really know what they're doing yet. I think if we had vets at those positions we would see fewer hits on purdy. Mckevis is also in his first starting assignment. Lots of inexperience there that can be exploited. Plus these guys are not the most physically imposing dudes in the world. End result is that purdy is getting hit too many times. He's not such a big guy. So we have to do something about it. My two cents.

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by bassmanr:
You mean in the NFCCG... when it matters that we need to beat another higher ranked team. Let's see what happens....

Then I guess the only good coach right now is Andy Reid who took over a decade to win it all

Extreme view again... No Kyle is a good coach. It's when the offense stalls he needs to try different schemes to open up what he wants to do primarily.

We have the players and the coach we just need Kyle to adapt when things aren't working. You know in game adjustments.

I totally agree with this. And we have that talent to turn on a dime my opinion, based on what the defense is giving/taking away or the weaknesses a team has by unit on defense.

My perception of Kyle is he wants to control the game through time of position, positive plays that keep the chains moving, showing defenses looks to set up for other things later, whether it be in game or putting certain looks and running certain plays in situations on film.

It works great usually. But if a team is sold out to stop the run, I think we still should be able to move the chains with Kittle, Juice, and CMC as catchers. We can run so many fakes with Deebo and CMC. There isn't a defense out there in my opinion that can stop all these guys a full 60 minutes.

This is what I was trying to say...if a defense says we are going to take out McCaffrey and Deebo. Then switch to kittle and Ayuik. He does want to control the game but football is just organized Kaos. He needs to change philosophy when things he's trying are not working.

Against most teams he will be able to control the way he wants, but with Philly or another top level team he will have the change what he's doing and adapt to what the D gives us.

Kyle's only major flaw along with losing it with 10 mins to go. Hopefully he will change and we can finally get number 6. We have the team, all stars everywhere. Philly has not had a bad steak yet Hopefully it's coming soon.

It's up to Purdy to make the on field decisions and reads, not Kyle

It is, but plays have to be called with Juice & Kittle as the primary targets, often, and CMC & Deebo as 3rd/4th/5th options.

Yes, when is running to the A gap over and over the defense plays to stop McCaffrey. Then a screen to Deebo which he's caught in the flat. Instead hit kittle in a release over the top to spread out the Defense. Purdy runs the plays Kyle calls.

If they are all to CMC and Deeb, the Defense is set to stop it, then he needs to adapt quickly. Change to open things up with quick reads over the top of the 8 man box. That will pull the safety back to cover the middle giving CMC more lanes. One example and I've seen him do it after a couple of 3 and outs. Against good teams he does not have that luxury to blow a series like that

Again, It's up to Purdy.

Purdy is not a one read QB. Each play is set up to make the defense pick their poison. Depending where the Defense goes, Purdy adjusts.

Actually it's not....Purdy looks at the formations and then runs the play with the order of operands Kyle gives him. Purdy is doing an amazing job with the o line he was given.

I just said that lol

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
49ers O line pass protection

97 pressures and 8 sacks on 313 dropbacks

Eagles O line pass protection

110 pressures and 22 sacks on 382 dropbacks

Pressure rate

49ers- 31.0%
Eagles- 28.8%

sack rate

49ers- 2.6%
Eagles- 5.8%

Are you saying purdybwas only sacked 4vtimes before tampa bay? That cant be right. Are these stats from pfr?

No. I am not saying that. Not all sacks are charged to an O lineman. In fact the only O lineman who have been charged with sacks this season are McKivitz with 5 and Burford with 3. Our other 12 sacks have either come from a free rusher on a blitz or Purdy escaping the pocket and being brought down just before the LOS.

oh. are you quoting some make believe pff stat that doesn't exist in the real world? The only thing people need to know about our pass pro is the eyeball test watching our guys get steamrolled now and then.

To be fair statistically, we do have good pass pro stats. Top5 in sacks given up (i.e. lower sacks). In my opinion that's much more scheme than talent. Purdy + shanny scheming first option reads to break open in < 2.5s.

We've given up 20 sacks so far.

Made up stat? Sacks are a team stat. So what you are saying is that Juice's sack is also on the O line? GTFOH!

These mystery stats are complicated and inevitably we don't know whos reposnsibility is what, or what should been called at the line.

Pretty useless to speculate about it except in the 49er film room.

Our sack percentage is not so good as our raw numbers.

So what you are saying is if Juice, Kittle or CMC give up a pressure or sack that is a reflection of of the O line? Separating responsibilty is exactly what we do to try and gauge the quality of players. If that is not what you think we should be doing than you should just take yourself right out of this conversation because you just lost all credibility.

If our oline is too confused to slide to a free runner, yea, it's still there problem.

No. Its the systems problem. The system allows free rushers in order to take advantage of the vacancy that those blitzers leave in the secondary. Brock is the highest blitzed QB in the NFL on 45.4% of his dropbacks. 12 of his 20 sacks have come from a blitz. Do you see how many times defenses have crowded the LOS with 6 or 7 could be rushers? The O line has no idea pre snap who is coming and who is dropping into coverage. Its Brock's responsibility in this system to beat the free rusher.

IIt's hard to say whose fault it is. Is it juices fault? Where the center is fault? Or Purdy's fault? Who knows how the reads and calls are supposed to happen. My opinion is that we get blitz so many times because we have a couple of young guys at guard who don't really know what they're doing yet. I think if we had vets at those positions we would see fewer hits on party. Mckevis is also in his first starting assignment. Lots of inexperience there that can be exploited. Plus these guys are not the most physically imposing dudes in the world. End result is that pretty is getting hit too many times. He's not such a big guy. So we have to do something about it. My two cents.

We get blitzed a whole lot because of Brock and his lightning quick processing. It has nothing to do with the O line. In fact, if defenses could get home consistently against our O line with 3 or 4 and drop everyone else into coverage, that is what they would do.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
49ers O line pass protection

97 pressures and 8 sacks on 313 dropbacks

Eagles O line pass protection

110 pressures and 22 sacks on 382 dropbacks

Pressure rate

49ers- 31.0%
Eagles- 28.8%

sack rate

49ers- 2.6%
Eagles- 5.8%

Are you saying purdybwas only sacked 4vtimes before tampa bay? That cant be right. Are these stats from pfr?

No. I am not saying that. Not all sacks are charged to an O lineman. In fact the only O lineman who have been charged with sacks this season are McKivitz with 5 and Burford with 3. Our other 12 sacks have either come from a free rusher on a blitz or Purdy escaping the pocket and being brought down just before the LOS.

oh. are you quoting some make believe pff stat that doesn't exist in the real world? The only thing people need to know about our pass pro is the eyeball test watching our guys get steamrolled now and then.

To be fair statistically, we do have good pass pro stats. Top5 in sacks given up (i.e. lower sacks). In my opinion that's much more scheme than talent. Purdy + shanny scheming first option reads to break open in < 2.5s.

We've given up 20 sacks so far.

Made up stat? Sacks are a team stat. So what you are saying is that Juice's sack is also on the O line? GTFOH!

These mystery stats are complicated and inevitably we don't know whos reposnsibility is what, or what should been called at the line.

Pretty useless to speculate about it except in the 49er film room.

Our sack percentage is not so good as our raw numbers.

So what you are saying is if Juice, Kittle or CMC give up a pressure or sack that is a reflection of of the O line? Separating responsibilty is exactly what we do to try and gauge the quality of players. If that is not what you think we should be doing than you should just take yourself right out of this conversation because you just lost all credibility.

If our oline is too confused to slide to a free runner, yea, it's still there problem. The bad guys need to rush 6 before we require a te in protection. How often has that happened.

This is why I always reference the term "unit pass protection." When pass protection isn't a top priority in talent acquisition or mastery (run blocking is), that extends to the rest of the unit pass protection in extra OL, TE'S, FB, RB's, etc. and QB's get killed as a result.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Simple. They pass the least in the NFL and focus on what they were built to do...run block (tier 1). And when this team can run block, they are on schedule to win and win big.

When not, it's game over because you're now playing to that 28th pass protection (unit).

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Simple. They pass the least in the NFL and focus on what they were built to do...run block (tier 1). And when this team can run block, they are on schedule to win and win big.

When not, it's game over because you're now playing to that 28th pass protection (unit).

Pass the least?, The QB is having a great season, not by just 49er QBs but versus all QBs in the NFL. 28th PB ranks doesn't allow that to happen

as far as Run game winning big? How many games this year did we win big because of the run?

Simple guys

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Simple. They pass the least in the NFL and focus on what they were built to do...run block (tier 1). And when this team can run block, they are on schedule to win and win big.

When not, it's game over because you're now playing to that 28th pass protection (unit).

Pass the least?, The QB is having a great season, not by just 49er QBs but versus all QBs in the NFL. 28th PB ranks doesn't allow that to happen

as far as Run game winning big? How many games this year did we win big because of the run?

When 6 of your 10 games are blowout victories by the end of the 3rd quarter and your QB leads the league in YPA, the amount of attempts are naturally going to be a lot less than say a team like the eagles who are in close games every single week.

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Simple. They pass the least in the NFL and focus on what they were built to do...run block (tier 1). And when this team can run block, they are on schedule to win and win big.

When not, it's game over because you're now playing to that 28th pass protection (unit).

Pass the least?, The QB is having a great season, not by just 49er QBs but versus all QBs in the NFL. 28th PB ranks doesn't allow that to happen

as far as Run game winning big? How many games this year did we win big because of the run?

You are aware both of these can be true at the same time, right?

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by bassmanr:

Originally posted by ritz126:

Originally posted by bassmanr:
You mean in the NFCCG... when it matters that we need to beat another higher ranked team. Let's see what happens....

Then I guess the only good coach right now is Andy Reid who took over a decade to win it all

Extreme view again... No Kyle is a good coach. It's when the offense stalls he needs to try different schemes to open up what he wants to do primarily.

We have the players and the coach we just need Kyle to adapt when things aren't working. You know in game adjustments.

I totally agree with this. And we have that talent to turn on a dime my opinion, based on what the defense is giving/taking away or the weaknesses a team has by unit on defense.

My perception of Kyle is he wants to control the game through time of position, positive plays that keep the chains moving, showing defenses looks to set up for other things later, whether it be in game or putting certain looks and running certain plays in situations on film.

It works great usually. But if a team is sold out to stop the run, I think we still should be able to move the chains with Kittle, Juice, and CMC as catchers. We can run so many fakes with Deebo and CMC. There isn't a defense out there in my opinion that can stop all these guys a full 60 minutes.

This is what I was trying to say...if a defense says we are going to take out McCaffrey and Deebo. Then switch to kittle and Ayuik. He does want to control the game but football is just organized Kaos. He needs to change philosophy when things he's trying are not working.

Against most teams he will be able to control the way he wants, but with Philly or another top level team he will have the change what he's doing and adapt to what the D gives us.

Kyle's only major flaw along with losing it with 10 mins to go. Hopefully he will change and we can finally get number 6. We have the team, all stars everywhere. Philly has not had a bad steak yet Hopefully it's coming soon.

It's up to Purdy to make the on field decisions and reads, not Kyle

It is, but plays have to be called with Juice & Kittle as the primary targets, often, and CMC & Deebo as 3rd/4th/5th options.

Yes, when is running to the A gap over and over the defense plays to stop McCaffrey. Then a screen to Deebo which he's caught in the flat. Instead hit kittle in a release over the top to spread out the Defense. Purdy runs the plays Kyle calls.

If they are all to CMC and Deeb, the Defense is set to stop it, then he needs to adapt quickly. Change to open things up with quick reads over the top of the 8 man box. That will pull the safety back to cover the middle giving CMC more lanes. One example and I've seen him do it after a couple of 3 and outs. Against good teams he does not have that luxury to blow a series like that

Again, It's up to Purdy.

Purdy is not a one read QB. Each play is set up to make the defense pick their poison. Depending where the Defense goes, Purdy adjusts.

Actually it's not....Purdy looks at the formations and then runs the play with the order of operands Kyle gives him. Purdy is doing an amazing job with the o line he was given.

I just said that lol

Lol 😆 I guess we agree then. That's Always a good thing.

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by Poldarn49:
FWIW, ESPN puts the OL pretty much at median.
Team PRWR RSWR PBWR RBWR
San Francisco 49ers 50%(6) 32%(15) 54%(19) 71%(17)

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/38356170/2023-nfl-pass-rush-run-stop-blocking-win-rate-rankings-top-players-teams

The KC IOL is nice per these metrics.

Good OL is where TrenchWarfare has us. ESPN about 19th (23rd composite) in PBWR. PFF has us 28th in PB.

We don't have the talent to swing higher than that and have too much talent to swing any lower than that (with a healthy Trent Williams).

That's our talent range IMHO. Depth is even worse.

How can a 28th ranked OL even win as much, nor even blowout teams, have the leading rusher and best rated QB ?

talent ranks is based on popularity, I rather have the results

Simple. They pass the least in the NFL and focus on what they were built to do...run block (tier 1). And when this team can run block, they are on schedule to win and win big.

When not, it's game over because you're now playing to that 28th pass protection (unit).

Pass the least?, The QB is having a great season, not by just 49er QBs but versus all QBs in the NFL. 28th PB ranks doesn't allow that to happen

as far as Run game winning big? How many games this year did we win big because of the run?

When 6 of your 10 games are blowout victories by the end of the 3rd quarter and your QB leads the league in YPA, the amount of attempts are naturally going to be a lot less than say a team like the eagles who are in close games every single week.

Except they are ALWAYS less every year under Kyle. That's not going to change. We'll always be bottom 5 because this is a run centric offense of which the passing game thrives off of. It's a Shanahan staple philosophy.

Originally posted by YACBros85:
When 6 of your 10 games are blowout victories by the end of the 3rd quarter and your QB leads the league in YPA, the amount of attempts are naturally going to be a lot less than say a team like the eagles who are in close games every single week.

We prefer O lines that struggle all game and have to win at end.