There are 184 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by NCommand:
You want results? Add up the W's of the top 7 teams on their list. . . .

The list that they compound AFTER watching the top 7 teams get W's??

You mean that list?

How can he not see the circularity?
that was just as funny as when Furlow could only point to win%

You always preach end-results. Except when it works against whatever weird narrative you have. I went as simple as possible for you and you still couldn't handle it.
Actually that's all you can handle, it's why you can't answer anything on these tiers. It's all good.

Here's your answer. Higher up the tiers, the better odds you have. Odd. You still have to have a matching QB though.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I haven't said a thing about the rankings other than I could see why they have it ranked that way this week. You and 2 others have an issue with it yet never have a thing to add about why you object to it. Odd stance esp. for units in tier 1 or 2.

If only team football were that simple in the real world. Per usual, you see no other factor in an outcome. Sad. There's so much more to football esp. here where the QB has the least passing attempts in the league.

As opposed to using one dudes ranking as the determination on whether a SB can be won or lost?

If it was all about team football you wouldn't have made your bet. You did it because you believe the O line and the O line alone will be what costs this team.

Brocks play will be the main factor. Not the only factor but the main one. Elite QB play is needed THE MOST. Elite o line play is a nice to have but not essential.

You mean subject matter experts? And proven end results after 7 straight years? Yeah, sorry if in don't pivot to you and All for best combination odds.

Nope, QB + OL in combination. That's the difference. At the time of the bet, the OL was the biggest question mark on the team and we were still learning about Brock. Nobody expected him to turn into an MVP candidate nor the OL being considered in the top five by SME's this late in the season. That's incredible. We should be celebrating that. Instead, it's just another no-argument, no POV.

History shows you need both. You can't be an elite QB if your OL is s**tting the bed. That combination is critical if you want to win a SuperBowl. That's football. But yes, Brock is the most critical piece. But make no mistake about it, the OL can undo him too, no matter how great he is. Let's hope that's not the case this year.
If no SME considered how well they would be, maybe they aren't SMEs

history shows you need a good QB and good enough OL, not the best OL

Huh? This ain't Madden. Injuries happen. Players grow and develop. There are personnel and scheme changes.

I'm surprised you haven't found a way to b***h about how we're the consensus top team to win the Superbowl, our tier 1 DL when healthy, how Brock and CMC are top MVP candidates, how this is the healthiest this team has been since the early Harbaugh years, etc.

But OL being top 5...

As to your second point, you need to restudy history. You clearly haven't gotten the memo posted for you for the past 7 years
[ Edited by NCommand on Dec 25, 2023 at 9:13 AM ]
Originally posted by YACBros85:
If they change their ranking every week including after the SB than they can never be wrong. 🤣

That's why he gravitates towards them specifically 🤣🤣
Originally posted by NCommand:
Huh? This ain't Madden. Injuries happen. Players grow and develop. There are personnel and scheme changes.

I'm surprised you haven't found a way to b***h about how we're the consensus top team to win the Superbowl, our tier 1 DL when healthy, how Brock and CMC are top MVP candidates, how this is the healthiest this team has been since the early Harbaugh years, etc.

But OL being top 5...

As to your second point, you need to restudy history. You clearly haven't gotten the memo posted for you for the past 7 years
you bit off the eggnogg already lol

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
If they change their ranking every week including after the SB than they can never be wrong. 🤣

That's why he gravitates towards them specifically 🤣🤣
lol
You need both guys!!!…,which is why I come in here yearly right after the niners season ends and puff my chest out saying I was right and the OL was the reason they lost. Lol such a joke
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
You need both guys!!!…,which is why I come in here yearly right after the niners season ends and puff my chest out saying I was right and the OL was the reason they lost. Lol such a joke
I've been saying it for 7 yearsss! i also bet smokey that you need the best OL to win !
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Huh? This ain't Madden. Injuries happen. Players grow and develop. There are personnel and scheme changes.

I'm surprised you haven't found a way to b***h about how we're the consensus top team to win the Superbowl, our tier 1 DL when healthy, how Brock and CMC are top MVP candidates, how this is the healthiest this team has been since the early Harbaugh years, etc.

But OL being top 5...

As to your second point, you need to restudy history. You clearly haven't gotten the memo posted for you for the past 7 years
you bit off the eggnogg already lol


That's better. Stick to your humor!
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
You need both guys!!!…,which is why I come in here yearly right after the niners season ends and puff my chest out saying I was right and the OL was the reason they lost. Lol such a joke
I've been saying it for 7 yearsss! i also bet smokey that you need the best OL to win !

Damn, the #1 OL. I'll need to let Smokey know we revised our bet.
Originally posted by NCommand:
That's better. Stick to your humor!
i mean, you aren't saying anything.. just repeating how wrong your are.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
That's better. Stick to your humor!
i mean, you aren't saying anything.. just repeating how wrong your are.

Wrong is something I haven't been on on this topic...for years! You? You've died on that hill for years. But that's OK. It's like a Christmas gift that just keeps on giving!
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
That's better. Stick to your humor!
i mean, you aren't saying anything.. just repeating how wrong your are.

Wrong is something I haven't been on on this topic...for years! You? You've died on that hill for years. But that's OK. It's like a Christmas gift that just keeps on giving!
if you weren't wrong you would have more people backing you than ridicule you.. what, you got 4f6 and 9moon backing you on this.. that's quite the brain trust there lol
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I haven't said a thing about the rankings other than I could see why they have it ranked that way this week. You and 2 others have an issue with it yet never have a thing to add about why you object to it. Odd stance esp. for units in tier 1 or 2.

If only team football were that simple in the real world. Per usual, you see no other factor in an outcome. Sad. There's so much more to football esp. here where the QB has the least passing attempts in the league.

As opposed to using one dudes ranking as the determination on whether a SB can be won or lost?

If it was all about team football you wouldn't have made your bet. You did it because you believe the O line and the O line alone will be what costs this team.

Brocks play will be the main factor. Not the only factor but the main one. Elite QB play is needed THE MOST. Elite o line play is a nice to have but not essential.

You mean subject matter experts? And proven end results after 7 straight years? Yeah, sorry if in don't pivot to you and All for best combination odds.

Nope, QB + OL in combination. That's the difference. At the time of the bet, the OL was the biggest question mark on the team and we were still learning about Brock. Nobody expected him to turn into an MVP candidate nor the OL being considered in the top five by SME's this late in the season. That's incredible. We should be celebrating that. Instead, it's just another no-argument, no POV.

History shows you need both. You can't be an elite QB if your OL is s**tting the bed. That combination is critical if you want to win a SuperBowl. That's football. But yes, Brock is the most critical piece. But make no mistake about it, the OL can undo him too, no matter how great he is. Let's hope that's not the case this year.
If no SME considered how well they would be, maybe they aren't SMEs

history shows you need a good QB and good enough OL, not the best OL

I'll just add the receivers are important. If you have a good QB, good OLine but only one or two receivers, the OLine has to pass protect longer to give the fewer recivers more time to get open (example:double moves).

Because the 49ers have so many weapons, multiple recivers are open on any given play. That helps the offensive line and the OLine stats. So as long as the 49ers OLine can give Brock a good solid 2.5 seconds, with his multiple offensive weapons - he's good. On another team, same OLine, and only one or two recivers, I'm betting not so good.

So the OLine (I still think) is still a couple of steps below the top, but still its an impressive run blocking OLine. McCaffrey isn't a possible MVP without getting those run blocks from the left side. That makes the OLine rise higher in terms of tiers.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I haven't said a thing about the rankings other than I could see why they have it ranked that way this week. You and 2 others have an issue with it yet never have a thing to add about why you object to it. Odd stance esp. for units in tier 1 or 2.

If only team football were that simple in the real world. Per usual, you see no other factor in an outcome. Sad. There's so much more to football esp. here where the QB has the least passing attempts in the league.

As opposed to using one dudes ranking as the determination on whether a SB can be won or lost?

If it was all about team football you wouldn't have made your bet. You did it because you believe the O line and the O line alone will be what costs this team.

Brocks play will be the main factor. Not the only factor but the main one. Elite QB play is needed THE MOST. Elite o line play is a nice to have but not essential.

You mean subject matter experts? And proven end results after 7 straight years? Yeah, sorry if in don't pivot to you and All for best combination odds.

Nope, QB + OL in combination. That's the difference. At the time of the bet, the OL was the biggest question mark on the team and we were still learning about Brock. Nobody expected him to turn into an MVP candidate nor the OL being considered in the top five by SME's this late in the season. That's incredible. We should be celebrating that. Instead, it's just another no-argument, no POV.

History shows you need both. You can't be an elite QB if your OL is s**tting the bed. That combination is critical if you want to win a SuperBowl. That's football. But yes, Brock is the most critical piece. But make no mistake about it, the OL can undo him too, no matter how great he is. Let's hope that's not the case this year.
If no SME considered how well they would be, maybe they aren't SMEs

history shows you need a good QB and good enough OL, not the best OL

I'll just add the receivers are important. If you have a good QB, good OLine but only one or two receivers, the OLine has to pass protect longer to give the fewer recivers more time to get open (example:double moves).

Because the 49ers have so many weapons, multiple recivers are open on any given play. That helps the offensive line and the OLine stats. So as long as the 49ers OLine can give Brock a good solid 2.5 seconds, with his multiple offensive weapons - he's good. On another team, same OLine, and only one or two recivers, I'm betting not so good.

So the OLine (I still think) is still a couple of steps below the top, but still its an impressive run blocking OLine. McCaffrey isn't a possible MVP without getting those run blocks from the left side. That makes the OLine rise higher in terms of tiers.
Yes, the Skill players are more of a priority. if we replaced all our skill players with #1 OL.. the offense wouldn't be they way it is today
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by NCommand:
I haven't said a thing about the rankings other than I could see why they have it ranked that way this week. You and 2 others have an issue with it yet never have a thing to add about why you object to it. Odd stance esp. for units in tier 1 or 2.

If only team football were that simple in the real world. Per usual, you see no other factor in an outcome. Sad. There's so much more to football esp. here where the QB has the least passing attempts in the league.

As opposed to using one dudes ranking as the determination on whether a SB can be won or lost?

If it was all about team football you wouldn't have made your bet. You did it because you believe the O line and the O line alone will be what costs this team.

Brocks play will be the main factor. Not the only factor but the main one. Elite QB play is needed THE MOST. Elite o line play is a nice to have but not essential.

You mean subject matter experts? And proven end results after 7 straight years? Yeah, sorry if in don't pivot to you and All for best combination odds.

Nope, QB + OL in combination. That's the difference. At the time of the bet, the OL was the biggest question mark on the team and we were still learning about Brock. Nobody expected him to turn into an MVP candidate nor the OL being considered in the top five by SME's this late in the season. That's incredible. We should be celebrating that. Instead, it's just another no-argument, no POV.

History shows you need both. You can't be an elite QB if your OL is s**tting the bed. That combination is critical if you want to win a SuperBowl. That's football. But yes, Brock is the most critical piece. But make no mistake about it, the OL can undo him too, no matter how great he is. Let's hope that's not the case this year.
If no SME considered how well they would be, maybe they aren't SMEs

history shows you need a good QB and good enough OL, not the best OL

I'll just add the receivers are important. If you have a good QB, good OLine but only one or two receivers, the OLine has to pass protect longer to give the fewer recivers more time to get open (example:double moves).

Because the 49ers have so many weapons, multiple recivers are open on any given play. That helps the offensive line and the OLine stats. So as long as the 49ers OLine can give Brock a good solid 2.5 seconds, with his multiple offensive weapons - he's good. On another team, same OLine, and only one or two recivers, I'm betting not so good.

So the OLine (I still think) is still a couple of steps below the top, but still its an impressive run blocking OLine. McCaffrey isn't a possible MVP without getting those run blocks from the left side. That makes the OLine rise higher in terms of tiers.
Yes, the Skill players are more of a priority. if we replaced all our skill players with #1 OL.. the offense wouldn't be they way it is today

Well - yes - what you get in terms of having more skill players is needing less O-line talent. *However* that is going to take up a lot of cap space. Kittle, Deebo, and CMC are probably being paid 15+ million a year each (I Defer to AB81 on this), a top tier O-line might be more cap friendly.

An OLine with two McKivitz on the outside OTs and three Banks on the inside, and Ronnie Bell, Dwelly, Mason, Ray Ray, Jauan Jennings (at the skill positions) - might be more sustainable from a cap perspective than Kittle, Deebo, Aiyuk, Juszczyk and CMC all together (for example).
Share 49ersWebzone