There are 889 users in the forums

49ers Offensive Line

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by mcwoot:
We have a bottom feeder OL, especially in pass-blocking. Believe PFF had us ranked #24 in pass blocking. Remove Trent and the rest are are bottom of the barrel. McKivitz wasn't the worst guy on the line but we need upgrades at every spot but LT and that will become a huge problem when age catches up to Trent, possibly as soon as this season. The unwillingness to address this is a real head-scratcher.

Cool thing is you can't remove Trent lol.

You like PFF numbers and just looking at PBLK grades, Feliciano was better than a f**k ton of bigger names like…

Peter Skoronsk (Top 10 pick)
Damien Lewis (Just got paid)
Jonah Jackson (One of the highest paid OGs)
Zion Johnson (1st rd pick)
Cesar Ruiz (1st rd pick just got paid)
Graham Glasgow
Cole strange (1st rd pick)

IMO banks was underwhelming this past yr and Brendel is awful as a pass-protector (good run-blocker). They really really need an upgrade at center. That's where I'm hoping Puni (or one of the later guys) can show up and develop at center.

I would love them to sign Conner Williams if his injury is on the right track
[ Edited by NYniner85 on May 14, 2024 at 6:03 PM ]
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree that Kyle likes his current OLine. One *big* factor that most don't mention is that Trent didn't retire and is still relatively healthy for his age. Compare that situation to (for example) Bryan Baluga who had multiple knee and ACL injuries throughout his career. As you, or another poster said, as long as Trent remains relatively healthy (i.e. doesn't miss more than two or three regular season games, and plays every playoff game relatively healthy) this OLine does look deep and solid.

As to your point about who will replace Trent - they have done massive trade ups before (Ex: Trey Lance draft deal) to get their guy. I can see them being desperate enough to do a blockbuster trade if they *know* there is a Trent Williams 2.0 in the 2025 draft that they *desperately* want. It's a long time between now and this time next year, and a lot of good and/or bad things can change on our Left Tackle situation.

Good post and I agree.

I find it frustrating that in the whole league with all the 32 practice squads, there isn't one OT,OG or Center that they can pluck off their rosters that would be better for the team than keeping a guy like Danny Gray or other non-performers.
It doesn't compute to me that they stay pat when there has to be better guys out there who can, at the very least, compete with what we have.

In the whole league - not one guy!
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree that Kyle likes his current OLine. One *big* factor that most don't mention is that Trent didn't retire and is still relatively healthy for his age. Compare that situation to (for example) Bryan Baluga who had multiple knee and ACL injuries throughout his career. As you, or another poster said, as long as Trent remains relatively healthy (i.e. doesn't miss more than two or three regular season games, and plays every playoff game relatively healthy) this OLine does look deep and solid.

As to your point about who will replace Trent - they have done massive trade ups before (Ex: Trey Lance draft deal) to get their guy. I can see them being desperate enough to do a blockbuster trade if they *know* there is a Trent Williams 2.0 in the 2025 draft that they *desperately* want. It's a long time between now and this time next year, and a lot of good and/or bad things can change on our Left Tackle situation.

Good post and I agree.

I find it frustrating that in the whole league with all the 32 practice squads, there isn't one OT,OG or Center that they can pluck off their rosters that would be better for the team than keeping a guy like Danny Gray or other non-performers.
It doesn't compute to me that they stay pat when there has to be better guys out there who can, at the very least, compete with what we have.

In the whole league - not one guy!

The NFL designed it that way, fortunately or unfortunately. The Cap, Draft, and Free agency serve to spread the talent very thin across the entire 32 teams of the NFL, such that every team in the NFL isn't too far behind the NFL leader (in this case KC and in 2nd position the 49ers) from a talent standpoint. The good thing is that 49ers can still keep good coaches like Foerster, but even that is difficult as is the case of losing Demeco, Salah, Clint Kubiak, and Bobby Slowik.

Good thing our Head Coach only has problems in the super bowl. The playoffs are a cakewalk for him.
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
I love Jauan Jennings, but Pearsall will overtake him. I think Mustapha should play. If Gurrendo doesn't play, I hope it's because we have a healthy version of 2021 Eli Mitchell. Then Cowings will have his opportunities. I don't see more than 30 catches a year for Pearsall or 20 for Cowings, but what they offer will be significant based on how defenses may start to defend us.

Feliciano sadly is retiring so Puni could be the guy at RG or LG. I'm hoping Nick Zakelj can play more.

I really do not see Kyle playing Pearson over Jennings. Kyle Like Michell so Gurrendo will probably be the 3rd RB. How many Target did RAY RAY get last year? That is the number of Targets Pearsall and Cowing will be fighting for. Combined they probably will be lucky to have 30 Targets. Unless Kyle changes the offense and goes much more passing offense but why trade up for Gurrendo if your going to pass more and run less? I still think they need someone to tell Kyle NO, you can not draft a Kicker in the third round. No you're going to a passing offense we're not trading up for a RB when you already have Christian McCaffrey. Kyle need someone to tell him NO.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Cool thing is you can't remove Trent lol.

You like at PFF and just the PBLK grades and Feliciano was better than a f**k ton of bigger names like…

Peter Skoronsk (Top 10 pick)
Damien Lewis (Just got paid)
Jonah Jackson (One of the highest paid OGs)
Zion Johnson (1st rd pick)
Cesar Ruiz (1st rd pick just got paid)
Graham Glasgow
Cole strange (1st rd pick)

IMO banks was underwhelming this past yr and Brendel is awful as a pass-protector (good run-blocker). They really really need an upgrade at center. That's where I'm hoping Puni (or one of the later guys) can show up and develop at center.

I would love them to sign Conner Williams if his injury is on the right track

Not making excuses because everyone is always hurting in football but banks was not healthy all year
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Cool thing is you can't remove Trent lol.

You like PFF numbers and just looking at PBLK grades, Feliciano was better than a f**k ton of bigger names like…

Peter Skoronsk (Top 10 pick)
Damien Lewis (Just got paid)
Jonah Jackson (One of the highest paid OGs)
Zion Johnson (1st rd pick)
Cesar Ruiz (1st rd pick just got paid)
Graham Glasgow
Cole strange (1st rd pick)

IMO banks was underwhelming this past yr and Brendel is awful as a pass-protector (good run-blocker). They really really need an upgrade at center. That's where I'm hoping Puni (or one of the later guys) can show up and develop at center.

I would love them to sign Conner Williams if his injury is on the right track

Not making excuses because everyone is always hurting in football but banks was not healthy all year

Hope so
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by LasVegasWally:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Agree that Kyle likes his current OLine. One *big* factor that most don't mention is that Trent didn't retire and is still relatively healthy for his age. Compare that situation to (for example) Bryan Baluga who had multiple knee and ACL injuries throughout his career. As you, or another poster said, as long as Trent remains relatively healthy (i.e. doesn't miss more than two or three regular season games, and plays every playoff game relatively healthy) this OLine does look deep and solid.

As to your point about who will replace Trent - they have done massive trade ups before (Ex: Trey Lance draft deal) to get their guy. I can see them being desperate enough to do a blockbuster trade if they *know* there is a Trent Williams 2.0 in the 2025 draft that they *desperately* want. It's a long time between now and this time next year, and a lot of good and/or bad things can change on our Left Tackle situation.

Good post and I agree.

I find it frustrating that in the whole league with all the 32 practice squads, there isn't one OT,OG or Center that they can pluck off their rosters that would be better for the team than keeping a guy like Danny Gray or other non-performers.
It doesn't compute to me that they stay pat when there has to be better guys out there who can, at the very least, compete with what we have.

In the whole league - not one guy!

The NFL designed it that way, fortunately or unfortunately. The Cap, Draft, and Free agency serve to spread the talent very thin across the entire 32 teams of the NFL, such that every team in the NFL isn't too far behind the NFL leader (in this case KC and in 2nd position the 49ers) from a talent standpoint. The good thing is that 49ers can still keep good coaches like Foerster, but even that is difficult as is the case of losing Demeco, Salah, Clint Kubiak, and Bobby Slowik.

Good thing our Head Coach only has problems in the super bowl. The playoffs are a cakewalk for him.

This is 100% true, the reason there's a draft, free agency, and salary cap, in which teams still need to spend a certain percentage of the cap in cash, the NFL is set to have as much parity as any league.

Look at the NBA for example, there's like 5-8 top teams in the league, that have pretty much all the MAJOR Star players, Super Teams, going 2-3 deep on Max contracts, but they did implement a new thing that will make it harder to have 2+ max contracts, unless the team wants to pay $100's of millions of dollars in tax penalties, like GS, PHX, LAC, etc....

There's literally no parity in MLB, there's no cap, there is a luxury tax that you can't go over, if you do, like with the NBA, you pay $100s of millions of dollars, you basically have the Yankees as one of the top 5 payrolls, then a team like the Athletics, or Orioles as bottom 5, even though Baltimore has a good team, as they drafted well, & developed those players, plus MLB has a minor league system, 6-7 teams per team(AAA, AA, High A, Low A, Rookie Ball, & 1-2 Dominican Summer League teams, Yankees have 2).

In the NHL there is a salary cap, but unlike the other 2 leagues with a cap(NFL & NBA), the players AAV/APY is their cap number each year, it's like with MLB for the most part, Aaron Judge's APY/AAV is $40M, which is what he gets paid each year thru 2031.

But back to the NFL, my point in why they have a draft, free agency, a cap is for parity, this is why we're seeing so many players signing elsewhere in the offseason, trades have become more common than they used to, they seem to be as common as NBA trades, except the whole taking on a large cap number for a 1st rd pick, teams will eat cap room to more picks for a player, like CAR did when we got CMC, while I remember CLE getting a 2nd rd pick for taking on Brock Osweiler's contract, but that type of deal doesn't happen much.

Plus look at all the revenue the NFL is pulling in, new TV deals with FOX, CBS for Sunday Afternoon Games, NBC for SNF, Peacock for FNF/Black Friday games, ESPN/ABC for MNF, Amazon Prime Video for TNF, & of course the huge NFL Sunday Ticket deal with YouTube TV/YouTube Premium Channels which is of course owned by Google, so every year the salary cap will go up, meaning players salaries will do so to, Goff now makes $53M a year, imagine what Brock may get next year? It'll end up being in the $50M+ a yr, but will be structured the way Bosa's is, low cap numbers in yrs 1-3, including the yr the extension was signed, so for Bosa that was 2023-2025, for Brock it'll be 2025-2027, then their cap hits go at or higher than their APY is.

Also each team is different when it comes to who or what position they will pay the most and least for, the 49ers value high paid QB, FB, WRs, TE, LT, EDGE, IDL, Off-Ball LB, & CB, they don't usually value a high end RB, but that changed when they acquired CMC, his actual APY is over $16M, but with us it's like $12M, they also don't value a high end C, LG, RG, & FS or SS, yes they've paid Jimmie Ward & Weston Richburg big money in the past, but they're more into low end deals, not something that will cripple the teams cap like a $20M a yr G, despite what fans want, and don't care if we go into cap hell for just 1 ring, it's not worth it, plus the majority of these big deals given out in FA, the teams end up regretting them, or the player gets cut or traded a yr or 2 into the deal.

When it comes to the OL, people need to realize that teams like to hoard them, as well as other positions, but with OL, there aren't a ton of quality, starting worthy OL on the market every year, and those tend to go for $16M-$20M a yr, something the 49ers will not pay a Guard, nor would I, that's ridiculous money for an IOL, so when you see them sign Brandon Parker & Chris Hubbard to cheap 1yr deals, who have starting experience, the 49ers got lucky they decided to take less to play here, well except for Eric Kendricks, who took less to go to Dallas, still pissed about that, that's why FA/New League Year needs to begin on the same day, no legal tampering period, so players don't back out of deals they agreed to.

As for the draft, obviously this is used to either fill holes, or draft for the future, even if you're the 49ers, a SB contender each year, as they took Pearsall, & Cowing who likely replace Jauan in 2025, & Deebo later on, I still see Deebo around as long as Kyle wants him to be, same with BA. They picks Puni, & Kingston because Banks won't be back if he's looking for $10M+ a yr, even average to below average IOL can get that kind of money now with the way the cap is going up by $20M a season, they drafted Mustapha IMO because they know Hufanga will be gone, they won't pay him top safety money, reason why they didn't sign one this offseason, like Justin Simmons, cause he's likely asking for way too much money, then at LB, they've drafted Graham, Winters, & Bethune in the past 2 drafts, so Dre may be gone, he's the one I think might stay, especially on a cheaper deal, and finally CB wise, Ward & Lenoir are UFAs after 2024, it'd be wise to extend Mooney now, cause they can save $9.148M in cap room, plus he's set to count $12.298M in 2025 as dead money, so they extend him now/before the season they have him locked into a new multi-year deal, & added cap room, Lenoir I'm 50/50 on what happens, if we can get him extended now, I'd do it, cause his price tag likely goes up next year, so that's why they drafted Green this year, and guys like Luter, & Womack in the last 2 drafts(2022 & 2023).

As for anyone interested in knowing where we'll likely be at when the season begins cap wise, I did a X/Twitter thread last night, idk how it'll look with the link, but I'll also explain here.

Basically the 49ers will be around $15M-$17M under the cap when the season begins, before a Aiyuk or Ward extension, they will get back that $18M on June 2nd, but I'm accounting for 71 total players(53-man roster, 16-man PS, & 1 PUP/Dre), so spots 52 & 53 will cost $795K each at minimum, so $1.59M total, then the PS can cost as much as $4,550,400 since the 49ers usually give the veterans they sign to the PS the max PS salary allowed, $21,300 a week this yr, while the 10 non vets with 2 or less accrued years get $16,800 a week.

I also went off of my 1st projection from after the draft, which gave me around $15.9M in cap room, so I'm estimating between $15M-$17M to begin, but remember we can extend Mooney to save $9.148M, and if they extend BA with a $25M signing bonus, they save $7.999M, which means they could have between $32.147M-$34.147M to begin 2024, with $5M set aside for in season roster moves, they'd likely carryover $27M-$29M of it.

As for 2025, I have them with 49 players signed, and $22.5M over a projected $280M cap, but they'll likely only have 30-34 players signed for 2025 when the season begins, & with myu roster I did I had them just $7.3M over, before BA's extension, this includes Mooney, cause he already counts $12.298M, and they can get his 2025 cap number at or a bit below that.

Now, when it comes to Aiyuk, what I would do is a $25M signing bonus, prorates at $5M a yr over 5yr, his 2024 cap hit is just $6.125M, saving the $7.999M I mentioned before, then for 2025, I think they can get his cap number in the $10M-$12M by doing a $10M option bonus in 2025, which they do with every big deal, each player gets a signing bonus & an option bonus the next year which is GTD already, but prorates, Bosa got a 3 tier bonus structure, $50M SB in 2023, $15.23M option bonus in 2024, & $29.015M option bonus in 2025, & Bosa has minimum salaries for each of the first 3yrs, including the yr he signed the extension, so 2023-2025, then it goes up in 2026 to over his APY at I think $40M or $42M, so they can do similar with BA, 3 tier bonus structure, minimum base salaries, all GTD like Bosa's, have his cap hits under his APY, which will be between $28M-$30M IMO.

So for 2025, the 49ers would be just $8.68M under a $280M cap, but with just 36 players signed, so with 51 they'd be around $3.92M over, this is assuming the deals for BA & Ward are what I'd do, & that we carryover between $27M-$29M, then they have options to create cap room in 2025.

The options to create cap room include CMC($8.596m w/extension), Deebo($12,344,423 w/extension), Kittle($10.516m w/extension), Trent($16.996m w/restructure), Hargrave($14.916m w/restructure), & Warner($13.116m w/restructure).

Before a Brock deal, the 49ers would have $94M in cap room in 2026 with 32 players signed, including 8 UDFAs they signed, but with 51 signed they'd have $77M in cap room, but it would likely take away around $35M in cap room for Brock, Mooney, & BA, but the $35M is just a guess, as I haven't done a mock deal for Brock, I'm assuming he gets the 3 tiered bonus structure, minimum base salaries all GTD at signing, with a huge signing bonus, & 2 option bonuses to help with the cap hits being lower than anyone expects, his cap hits wouldn't hit near his APY till 2028 if they do it like they did with Bosa.

So as I said in the thread, the next 3 yrs are just fine cap wise, they'll carryover a good amount of cap room into 2025, depending on how much they save from BAs expected extension, & a potential Mooney extension, while they'd be able to save more in 2025 by extending the likes of CMC, Deebo, & Kittle, I say these 3, because I don't see the 49ers getting rid of any of these 3, especially if they're 1. producing, 2. healthy, and 3. still among the best in the league, if so, they get extended, cause they count $13.625M for Kittle in 2026 in dead money, $8.493M for Deebo in 2026, & $4.288M for CMC in 2026, so they could get those 3 players' cap hits somewhere around the total of those 3, which is $26.406M, or a little more, in the $30M range for those 3 is a more likely outcome if they're all extended.

But, I'm not worried about the 49ers cap going forward post BA & Brock extensions, cause I've explained it all already, shown how we can keep our core together for a while, plus Trent likely will retire in 2026, which saves cap room, plus they can save money by moving on from Brendel if they find a C or someone steps up as the new C from the young guys we've picked.

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
This is 100% true, the reason there's a draft, free agency, and salary cap, in which teams still need to spend a certain percentage of the cap in cash, the NFL is set to have as much parity as any league.

Look at the NBA for example, there's like 5-8 top teams in the league, that have pretty much all the MAJOR Star players, Super Teams, going 2-3 deep on Max contracts, but they did implement a new thing that will make it harder to have 2+ max contracts, unless the team wants to pay $100's of millions of dollars in tax penalties, like GS, PHX, LAC, etc....

There's literally no parity in MLB, there's no cap, there is a luxury tax that you can't go over, if you do, like with the NBA, you pay $100s of millions of dollars, you basically have the Yankees as one of the top 5 payrolls, then a team like the Athletics, or Orioles as bottom 5, even though Baltimore has a good team, as they drafted well, & developed those players, plus MLB has a minor league system, 6-7 teams per team(AAA, AA, High A, Low A, Rookie Ball, & 1-2 Dominican Summer League teams, Yankees have 2).

In the NHL there is a salary cap, but unlike the other 2 leagues with a cap(NFL & NBA), the players AAV/APY is their cap number each year, it's like with MLB for the most part, Aaron Judge's APY/AAV is $40M, which is what he gets paid each year thru 2031.

But back to the NFL, my point in why they have a draft, free agency, a cap is for parity, this is why we're seeing so many players signing elsewhere in the offseason, trades have become more common than they used to, they seem to be as common as NBA trades, except the whole taking on a large cap number for a 1st rd pick, teams will eat cap room to more picks for a player, like CAR did when we got CMC, while I remember CLE getting a 2nd rd pick for taking on Brock Osweiler's contract, but that type of deal doesn't happen much.

Plus look at all the revenue the NFL is pulling in, new TV deals with FOX, CBS for Sunday Afternoon Games, NBC for SNF, Peacock for FNF/Black Friday games, ESPN/ABC for MNF, Amazon Prime Video for TNF, & of course the huge NFL Sunday Ticket deal with YouTube TV/YouTube Premium Channels which is of course owned by Google, so every year the salary cap will go up, meaning players salaries will do so to, Goff now makes $53M a year, imagine what Brock may get next year? It'll end up being in the $50M+ a yr, but will be structured the way Bosa's is, low cap numbers in yrs 1-3, including the yr the extension was signed, so for Bosa that was 2023-2025, for Brock it'll be 2025-2027, then their cap hits go at or higher than their APY is.

Also each team is different when it comes to who or what position they will pay the most and least for, the 49ers value high paid QB, FB, WRs, TE, LT, EDGE, IDL, Off-Ball LB, & CB, they don't usually value a high end RB, but that changed when they acquired CMC, his actual APY is over $16M, but with us it's like $12M, they also don't value a high end C, LG, RG, & FS or SS, yes they've paid Jimmie Ward & Weston Richburg big money in the past, but they're more into low end deals, not something that will cripple the teams cap like a $20M a yr G, despite what fans want, and don't care if we go into cap hell for just 1 ring, it's not worth it, plus the majority of these big deals given out in FA, the teams end up regretting them, or the player gets cut or traded a yr or 2 into the deal.

When it comes to the OL, people need to realize that teams like to hoard them, as well as other positions, but with OL, there aren't a ton of quality, starting worthy OL on the market every year, and those tend to go for $16M-$20M a yr, something the 49ers will not pay a Guard, nor would I, that's ridiculous money for an IOL, so when you see them sign Brandon Parker & Chris Hubbard to cheap 1yr deals, who have starting experience, the 49ers got lucky they decided to take less to play here, well except for Eric Kendricks, who took less to go to Dallas, still pissed about that, that's why FA/New League Year needs to begin on the same day, no legal tampering period, so players don't back out of deals they agreed to.

As for the draft, obviously this is used to either fill holes, or draft for the future, even if you're the 49ers, a SB contender each year, as they took Pearsall, & Cowing who likely replace Jauan in 2025, & Deebo later on, I still see Deebo around as long as Kyle wants him to be, same with BA. They picks Puni, & Kingston because Banks won't be back if he's looking for $10M+ a yr, even average to below average IOL can get that kind of money now with the way the cap is going up by $20M a season, they drafted Mustapha IMO because they know Hufanga will be gone, they won't pay him top safety money, reason why they didn't sign one this offseason, like Justin Simmons, cause he's likely asking for way too much money, then at LB, they've drafted Graham, Winters, & Bethune in the past 2 drafts, so Dre may be gone, he's the one I think might stay, especially on a cheaper deal, and finally CB wise, Ward & Lenoir are UFAs after 2024, it'd be wise to extend Mooney now, cause they can save $9.148M in cap room, plus he's set to count $12.298M in 2025 as dead money, so they extend him now/before the season they have him locked into a new multi-year deal, & added cap room, Lenoir I'm 50/50 on what happens, if we can get him extended now, I'd do it, cause his price tag likely goes up next year, so that's why they drafted Green this year, and guys like Luter, & Womack in the last 2 drafts(2022 & 2023).

As for anyone interested in knowing where we'll likely be at when the season begins cap wise, I did a X/Twitter thread last night, idk how it'll look with the link, but I'll also explain here.

Basically the 49ers will be around $15M-$17M under the cap when the season begins, before a Aiyuk or Ward extension, they will get back that $18M on June 2nd, but I'm accounting for 71 total players(53-man roster, 16-man PS, & 1 PUP/Dre), so spots 52 & 53 will cost $795K each at minimum, so $1.59M total, then the PS can cost as much as $4,550,400 since the 49ers usually give the veterans they sign to the PS the max PS salary allowed, $21,300 a week this yr, while the 10 non vets with 2 or less accrued years get $16,800 a week.

I also went off of my 1st projection from after the draft, which gave me around $15.9M in cap room, so I'm estimating between $15M-$17M to begin, but remember we can extend Mooney to save $9.148M, and if they extend BA with a $25M signing bonus, they save $7.999M, which means they could have between $32.147M-$34.147M to begin 2024, with $5M set aside for in season roster moves, they'd likely carryover $27M-$29M of it.

As for 2025, I have them with 49 players signed, and $22.5M over a projected $280M cap, but they'll likely only have 30-34 players signed for 2025 when the season begins, & with myu roster I did I had them just $7.3M over, before BA's extension, this includes Mooney, cause he already counts $12.298M, and they can get his 2025 cap number at or a bit below that.

Now, when it comes to Aiyuk, what I would do is a $25M signing bonus, prorates at $5M a yr over 5yr, his 2024 cap hit is just $6.125M, saving the $7.999M I mentioned before, then for 2025, I think they can get his cap number in the $10M-$12M by doing a $10M option bonus in 2025, which they do with every big deal, each player gets a signing bonus & an option bonus the next year which is GTD already, but prorates, Bosa got a 3 tier bonus structure, $50M SB in 2023, $15.23M option bonus in 2024, & $29.015M option bonus in 2025, & Bosa has minimum salaries for each of the first 3yrs, including the yr he signed the extension, so 2023-2025, then it goes up in 2026 to over his APY at I think $40M or $42M, so they can do similar with BA, 3 tier bonus structure, minimum base salaries, all GTD like Bosa's, have his cap hits under his APY, which will be between $28M-$30M IMO.

So for 2025, the 49ers would be just $8.68M under a $280M cap, but with just 36 players signed, so with 51 they'd be around $3.92M over, this is assuming the deals for BA & Ward are what I'd do, & that we carryover between $27M-$29M, then they have options to create cap room in 2025.

The options to create cap room include CMC($8.596m w/extension), Deebo($12,344,423 w/extension), Kittle($10.516m w/extension), Trent($16.996m w/restructure), Hargrave($14.916m w/restructure), & Warner($13.116m w/restructure).

Before a Brock deal, the 49ers would have $94M in cap room in 2026 with 32 players signed, including 8 UDFAs they signed, but with 51 signed they'd have $77M in cap room, but it would likely take away around $35M in cap room for Brock, Mooney, & BA, but the $35M is just a guess, as I haven't done a mock deal for Brock, I'm assuming he gets the 3 tiered bonus structure, minimum base salaries all GTD at signing, with a huge signing bonus, & 2 option bonuses to help with the cap hits being lower than anyone expects, his cap hits wouldn't hit near his APY till 2028 if they do it like they did with Bosa.

So as I said in the thread, the next 3 yrs are just fine cap wise, they'll carryover a good amount of cap room into 2025, depending on how much they save from BAs expected extension, & a potential Mooney extension, while they'd be able to save more in 2025 by extending the likes of CMC, Deebo, & Kittle, I say these 3, because I don't see the 49ers getting rid of any of these 3, especially if they're 1. producing, 2. healthy, and 3. still among the best in the league, if so, they get extended, cause they count $13.625M for Kittle in 2026 in dead money, $8.493M for Deebo in 2026, & $4.288M for CMC in 2026, so they could get those 3 players' cap hits somewhere around the total of those 3, which is $26.406M, or a little more, in the $30M range for those 3 is a more likely outcome if they're all extended.

But, I'm not worried about the 49ers cap going forward post BA & Brock extensions, cause I've explained it all already, shown how we can keep our core together for a while, plus Trent likely will retire in 2026, which saves cap room, plus they can save money by moving on from Brendel if they find a C or someone steps up as the new C from the young guys we've picked.


Nice work as always!
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
This is 100% true, the reason there's a draft, free agency, and salary cap, in which teams still need to spend a certain percentage of the cap in cash, the NFL is set to have as much parity as any league.

Look at the NBA for example, there's like 5-8 top teams in the league, that have pretty much all the MAJOR Star players, Super Teams, going 2-3 deep on Max contracts, but they did implement a new thing that will make it harder to have 2+ max contracts, unless the team wants to pay $100's of millions of dollars in tax penalties, like GS, PHX, LAC, etc....

There's literally no parity in MLB, there's no cap, there is a luxury tax that you can't go over, if you do, like with the NBA, you pay $100s of millions of dollars, you basically have the Yankees as one of the top 5 payrolls, then a team like the Athletics, or Orioles as bottom 5, even though Baltimore has a good team, as they drafted well, & developed those players, plus MLB has a minor league system, 6-7 teams per team(AAA, AA, High A, Low A, Rookie Ball, & 1-2 Dominican Summer League teams, Yankees have 2).

In the NHL there is a salary cap, but unlike the other 2 leagues with a cap(NFL & NBA), the players AAV/APY is their cap number each year, it's like with MLB for the most part, Aaron Judge's APY/AAV is $40M, which is what he gets paid each year thru 2031.

But back to the NFL, my point in why they have a draft, free agency, a cap is for parity, this is why we're seeing so many players signing elsewhere in the offseason, trades have become more common than they used to, they seem to be as common as NBA trades, except the whole taking on a large cap number for a 1st rd pick, teams will eat cap room to more picks for a player, like CAR did when we got CMC, while I remember CLE getting a 2nd rd pick for taking on Brock Osweiler's contract, but that type of deal doesn't happen much.

Plus look at all the revenue the NFL is pulling in, new TV deals with FOX, CBS for Sunday Afternoon Games, NBC for SNF, Peacock for FNF/Black Friday games, ESPN/ABC for MNF, Amazon Prime Video for TNF, & of course the huge NFL Sunday Ticket deal with YouTube TV/YouTube Premium Channels which is of course owned by Google, so every year the salary cap will go up, meaning players salaries will do so to, Goff now makes $53M a year, imagine what Brock may get next year? It'll end up being in the $50M+ a yr, but will be structured the way Bosa's is, low cap numbers in yrs 1-3, including the yr the extension was signed, so for Bosa that was 2023-2025, for Brock it'll be 2025-2027, then their cap hits go at or higher than their APY is.

Also each team is different when it comes to who or what position they will pay the most and least for, the 49ers value high paid QB, FB, WRs, TE, LT, EDGE, IDL, Off-Ball LB, & CB, they don't usually value a high end RB, but that changed when they acquired CMC, his actual APY is over $16M, but with us it's like $12M, they also don't value a high end C, LG, RG, & FS or SS, yes they've paid Jimmie Ward & Weston Richburg big money in the past, but they're more into low end deals, not something that will cripple the teams cap like a $20M a yr G, despite what fans want, and don't care if we go into cap hell for just 1 ring, it's not worth it, plus the majority of these big deals given out in FA, the teams end up regretting them, or the player gets cut or traded a yr or 2 into the deal.

When it comes to the OL, people need to realize that teams like to hoard them, as well as other positions, but with OL, there aren't a ton of quality, starting worthy OL on the market every year, and those tend to go for $16M-$20M a yr, something the 49ers will not pay a Guard, nor would I, that's ridiculous money for an IOL, so when you see them sign Brandon Parker & Chris Hubbard to cheap 1yr deals, who have starting experience, the 49ers got lucky they decided to take less to play here, well except for Eric Kendricks, who took less to go to Dallas, still pissed about that, that's why FA/New League Year needs to begin on the same day, no legal tampering period, so players don't back out of deals they agreed to.

As for the draft, obviously this is used to either fill holes, or draft for the future, even if you're the 49ers, a SB contender each year, as they took Pearsall, & Cowing who likely replace Jauan in 2025, & Deebo later on, I still see Deebo around as long as Kyle wants him to be, same with BA. They picks Puni, & Kingston because Banks won't be back if he's looking for $10M+ a yr, even average to below average IOL can get that kind of money now with the way the cap is going up by $20M a season, they drafted Mustapha IMO because they know Hufanga will be gone, they won't pay him top safety money, reason why they didn't sign one this offseason, like Justin Simmons, cause he's likely asking for way too much money, then at LB, they've drafted Graham, Winters, & Bethune in the past 2 drafts, so Dre may be gone, he's the one I think might stay, especially on a cheaper deal, and finally CB wise, Ward & Lenoir are UFAs after 2024, it'd be wise to extend Mooney now, cause they can save $9.148M in cap room, plus he's set to count $12.298M in 2025 as dead money, so they extend him now/before the season they have him locked into a new multi-year deal, & added cap room, Lenoir I'm 50/50 on what happens, if we can get him extended now, I'd do it, cause his price tag likely goes up next year, so that's why they drafted Green this year, and guys like Luter, & Womack in the last 2 drafts(2022 & 2023).

As for anyone interested in knowing where we'll likely be at when the season begins cap wise, I did a X/Twitter thread last night, idk how it'll look with the link, but I'll also explain here.

Basically the 49ers will be around $15M-$17M under the cap when the season begins, before a Aiyuk or Ward extension, they will get back that $18M on June 2nd, but I'm accounting for 71 total players(53-man roster, 16-man PS, & 1 PUP/Dre), so spots 52 & 53 will cost $795K each at minimum, so $1.59M total, then the PS can cost as much as $4,550,400 since the 49ers usually give the veterans they sign to the PS the max PS salary allowed, $21,300 a week this yr, while the 10 non vets with 2 or less accrued years get $16,800 a week.

I also went off of my 1st projection from after the draft, which gave me around $15.9M in cap room, so I'm estimating between $15M-$17M to begin, but remember we can extend Mooney to save $9.148M, and if they extend BA with a $25M signing bonus, they save $7.999M, which means they could have between $32.147M-$34.147M to begin 2024, with $5M set aside for in season roster moves, they'd likely carryover $27M-$29M of it.

As for 2025, I have them with 49 players signed, and $22.5M over a projected $280M cap, but they'll likely only have 30-34 players signed for 2025 when the season begins, & with myu roster I did I had them just $7.3M over, before BA's extension, this includes Mooney, cause he already counts $12.298M, and they can get his 2025 cap number at or a bit below that.

Now, when it comes to Aiyuk, what I would do is a $25M signing bonus, prorates at $5M a yr over 5yr, his 2024 cap hit is just $6.125M, saving the $7.999M I mentioned before, then for 2025, I think they can get his cap number in the $10M-$12M by doing a $10M option bonus in 2025, which they do with every big deal, each player gets a signing bonus & an option bonus the next year which is GTD already, but prorates, Bosa got a 3 tier bonus structure, $50M SB in 2023, $15.23M option bonus in 2024, & $29.015M option bonus in 2025, & Bosa has minimum salaries for each of the first 3yrs, including the yr he signed the extension, so 2023-2025, then it goes up in 2026 to over his APY at I think $40M or $42M, so they can do similar with BA, 3 tier bonus structure, minimum base salaries, all GTD like Bosa's, have his cap hits under his APY, which will be between $28M-$30M IMO.

So for 2025, the 49ers would be just $8.68M under a $280M cap, but with just 36 players signed, so with 51 they'd be around $3.92M over, this is assuming the deals for BA & Ward are what I'd do, & that we carryover between $27M-$29M, then they have options to create cap room in 2025.

The options to create cap room include CMC($8.596m w/extension), Deebo($12,344,423 w/extension), Kittle($10.516m w/extension), Trent($16.996m w/restructure), Hargrave($14.916m w/restructure), & Warner($13.116m w/restructure).

Before a Brock deal, the 49ers would have $94M in cap room in 2026 with 32 players signed, including 8 UDFAs they signed, but with 51 signed they'd have $77M in cap room, but it would likely take away around $35M in cap room for Brock, Mooney, & BA, but the $35M is just a guess, as I haven't done a mock deal for Brock, I'm assuming he gets the 3 tiered bonus structure, minimum base salaries all GTD at signing, with a huge signing bonus, & 2 option bonuses to help with the cap hits being lower than anyone expects, his cap hits wouldn't hit near his APY till 2028 if they do it like they did with Bosa.

So as I said in the thread, the next 3 yrs are just fine cap wise, they'll carryover a good amount of cap room into 2025, depending on how much they save from BAs expected extension, & a potential Mooney extension, while they'd be able to save more in 2025 by extending the likes of CMC, Deebo, & Kittle, I say these 3, because I don't see the 49ers getting rid of any of these 3, especially if they're 1. producing, 2. healthy, and 3. still among the best in the league, if so, they get extended, cause they count $13.625M for Kittle in 2026 in dead money, $8.493M for Deebo in 2026, & $4.288M for CMC in 2026, so they could get those 3 players' cap hits somewhere around the total of those 3, which is $26.406M, or a little more, in the $30M range for those 3 is a more likely outcome if they're all extended.

But, I'm not worried about the 49ers cap going forward post BA & Brock extensions, cause I've explained it all already, shown how we can keep our core together for a while, plus Trent likely will retire in 2026, which saves cap room, plus they can save money by moving on from Brendel if they find a C or someone steps up as the new C from the young guys we've picked.


Nice work as always!

Thanks my friend, I forgot 1 thing, if a team can use a PS QB as the emergency 3rd QB & it doesn't count against the players max games played in 1 season(3), or count against the max of 2 players that can be elevated, then I'm all for releasing Brandon Allen, who won't go thru waivers, so they can make a hand shake agreement like when vets get cut so teams can put guys(injured) on short term IR, this is what I'd do, keep just Brock & Dobbs on the 53, Allen on the PS, as he's GTD $400k of his 2024 base salary already, so the 49ers would get back $383,400 of the $400k if they give him the max salary of $21,300 a week, plus if they cut him they save $840k, since he got a $300k signing bonus, so that would come back in 2025 as part of their adjustments/credits.

They also need to payback players' per game roster bonuses, like Hargrave($44,118), Deebo & Trent($88,235 each), Collins & Greenlaw($29,412 each), Campbell($120k), Odum($60k), Gross-Matos($150k), & Brandon Allen($480k), so the 49ers need a decent amount to pay these 9 players back, not sure the exact amount, on my iPad right now in bed, late here in NY.
If I told you not to sleep on a kid they snagged named Briason Mays......
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by frenchmov:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
This is 100% true, the reason there's a draft, free agency, and salary cap, in which teams still need to spend a certain percentage of the cap in cash, the NFL is set to have as much parity as any league.

Look at the NBA for example, there's like 5-8 top teams in the league, that have pretty much all the MAJOR Star players, Super Teams, going 2-3 deep on Max contracts, but they did implement a new thing that will make it harder to have 2+ max contracts, unless the team wants to pay $100's of millions of dollars in tax penalties, like GS, PHX, LAC, etc....

There's literally no parity in MLB, there's no cap, there is a luxury tax that you can't go over, if you do, like with the NBA, you pay $100s of millions of dollars, you basically have the Yankees as one of the top 5 payrolls, then a team like the Athletics, or Orioles as bottom 5, even though Baltimore has a good team, as they drafted well, & developed those players, plus MLB has a minor league system, 6-7 teams per team(AAA, AA, High A, Low A, Rookie Ball, & 1-2 Dominican Summer League teams, Yankees have 2).

In the NHL there is a salary cap, but unlike the other 2 leagues with a cap(NFL & NBA), the players AAV/APY is their cap number each year, it's like with MLB for the most part, Aaron Judge's APY/AAV is $40M, which is what he gets paid each year thru 2031.

But back to the NFL, my point in why they have a draft, free agency, a cap is for parity, this is why we're seeing so many players signing elsewhere in the offseason, trades have become more common than they used to, they seem to be as common as NBA trades, except the whole taking on a large cap number for a 1st rd pick, teams will eat cap room to more picks for a player, like CAR did when we got CMC, while I remember CLE getting a 2nd rd pick for taking on Brock Osweiler's contract, but that type of deal doesn't happen much.

Plus look at all the revenue the NFL is pulling in, new TV deals with FOX, CBS for Sunday Afternoon Games, NBC for SNF, Peacock for FNF/Black Friday games, ESPN/ABC for MNF, Amazon Prime Video for TNF, & of course the huge NFL Sunday Ticket deal with YouTube TV/YouTube Premium Channels which is of course owned by Google, so every year the salary cap will go up, meaning players salaries will do so to, Goff now makes $53M a year, imagine what Brock may get next year? It'll end up being in the $50M+ a yr, but will be structured the way Bosa's is, low cap numbers in yrs 1-3, including the yr the extension was signed, so for Bosa that was 2023-2025, for Brock it'll be 2025-2027, then their cap hits go at or higher than their APY is.

Also each team is different when it comes to who or what position they will pay the most and least for, the 49ers value high paid QB, FB, WRs, TE, LT, EDGE, IDL, Off-Ball LB, & CB, they don't usually value a high end RB, but that changed when they acquired CMC, his actual APY is over $16M, but with us it's like $12M, they also don't value a high end C, LG, RG, & FS or SS, yes they've paid Jimmie Ward & Weston Richburg big money in the past, but they're more into low end deals, not something that will cripple the teams cap like a $20M a yr G, despite what fans want, and don't care if we go into cap hell for just 1 ring, it's not worth it, plus the majority of these big deals given out in FA, the teams end up regretting them, or the player gets cut or traded a yr or 2 into the deal.

When it comes to the OL, people need to realize that teams like to hoard them, as well as other positions, but with OL, there aren't a ton of quality, starting worthy OL on the market every year, and those tend to go for $16M-$20M a yr, something the 49ers will not pay a Guard, nor would I, that's ridiculous money for an IOL, so when you see them sign Brandon Parker & Chris Hubbard to cheap 1yr deals, who have starting experience, the 49ers got lucky they decided to take less to play here, well except for Eric Kendricks, who took less to go to Dallas, still pissed about that, that's why FA/New League Year needs to begin on the same day, no legal tampering period, so players don't back out of deals they agreed to.

As for the draft, obviously this is used to either fill holes, or draft for the future, even if you're the 49ers, a SB contender each year, as they took Pearsall, & Cowing who likely replace Jauan in 2025, & Deebo later on, I still see Deebo around as long as Kyle wants him to be, same with BA. They picks Puni, & Kingston because Banks won't be back if he's looking for $10M+ a yr, even average to below average IOL can get that kind of money now with the way the cap is going up by $20M a season, they drafted Mustapha IMO because they know Hufanga will be gone, they won't pay him top safety money, reason why they didn't sign one this offseason, like Justin Simmons, cause he's likely asking for way too much money, then at LB, they've drafted Graham, Winters, & Bethune in the past 2 drafts, so Dre may be gone, he's the one I think might stay, especially on a cheaper deal, and finally CB wise, Ward & Lenoir are UFAs after 2024, it'd be wise to extend Mooney now, cause they can save $9.148M in cap room, plus he's set to count $12.298M in 2025 as dead money, so they extend him now/before the season they have him locked into a new multi-year deal, & added cap room, Lenoir I'm 50/50 on what happens, if we can get him extended now, I'd do it, cause his price tag likely goes up next year, so that's why they drafted Green this year, and guys like Luter, & Womack in the last 2 drafts(2022 & 2023).

As for anyone interested in knowing where we'll likely be at when the season begins cap wise, I did a X/Twitter thread last night, idk how it'll look with the link, but I'll also explain here.

Basically the 49ers will be around $15M-$17M under the cap when the season begins, before a Aiyuk or Ward extension, they will get back that $18M on June 2nd, but I'm accounting for 71 total players(53-man roster, 16-man PS, & 1 PUP/Dre), so spots 52 & 53 will cost $795K each at minimum, so $1.59M total, then the PS can cost as much as $4,550,400 since the 49ers usually give the veterans they sign to the PS the max PS salary allowed, $21,300 a week this yr, while the 10 non vets with 2 or less accrued years get $16,800 a week.

I also went off of my 1st projection from after the draft, which gave me around $15.9M in cap room, so I'm estimating between $15M-$17M to begin, but remember we can extend Mooney to save $9.148M, and if they extend BA with a $25M signing bonus, they save $7.999M, which means they could have between $32.147M-$34.147M to begin 2024, with $5M set aside for in season roster moves, they'd likely carryover $27M-$29M of it.

As for 2025, I have them with 49 players signed, and $22.5M over a projected $280M cap, but they'll likely only have 30-34 players signed for 2025 when the season begins, & with myu roster I did I had them just $7.3M over, before BA's extension, this includes Mooney, cause he already counts $12.298M, and they can get his 2025 cap number at or a bit below that.

Now, when it comes to Aiyuk, what I would do is a $25M signing bonus, prorates at $5M a yr over 5yr, his 2024 cap hit is just $6.125M, saving the $7.999M I mentioned before, then for 2025, I think they can get his cap number in the $10M-$12M by doing a $10M option bonus in 2025, which they do with every big deal, each player gets a signing bonus & an option bonus the next year which is GTD already, but prorates, Bosa got a 3 tier bonus structure, $50M SB in 2023, $15.23M option bonus in 2024, & $29.015M option bonus in 2025, & Bosa has minimum salaries for each of the first 3yrs, including the yr he signed the extension, so 2023-2025, then it goes up in 2026 to over his APY at I think $40M or $42M, so they can do similar with BA, 3 tier bonus structure, minimum base salaries, all GTD like Bosa's, have his cap hits under his APY, which will be between $28M-$30M IMO.

So for 2025, the 49ers would be just $8.68M under a $280M cap, but with just 36 players signed, so with 51 they'd be around $3.92M over, this is assuming the deals for BA & Ward are what I'd do, & that we carryover between $27M-$29M, then they have options to create cap room in 2025.

The options to create cap room include CMC($8.596m w/extension), Deebo($12,344,423 w/extension), Kittle($10.516m w/extension), Trent($16.996m w/restructure), Hargrave($14.916m w/restructure), & Warner($13.116m w/restructure).

Before a Brock deal, the 49ers would have $94M in cap room in 2026 with 32 players signed, including 8 UDFAs they signed, but with 51 signed they'd have $77M in cap room, but it would likely take away around $35M in cap room for Brock, Mooney, & BA, but the $35M is just a guess, as I haven't done a mock deal for Brock, I'm assuming he gets the 3 tiered bonus structure, minimum base salaries all GTD at signing, with a huge signing bonus, & 2 option bonuses to help with the cap hits being lower than anyone expects, his cap hits wouldn't hit near his APY till 2028 if they do it like they did with Bosa.

So as I said in the thread, the next 3 yrs are just fine cap wise, they'll carryover a good amount of cap room into 2025, depending on how much they save from BAs expected extension, & a potential Mooney extension, while they'd be able to save more in 2025 by extending the likes of CMC, Deebo, & Kittle, I say these 3, because I don't see the 49ers getting rid of any of these 3, especially if they're 1. producing, 2. healthy, and 3. still among the best in the league, if so, they get extended, cause they count $13.625M for Kittle in 2026 in dead money, $8.493M for Deebo in 2026, & $4.288M for CMC in 2026, so they could get those 3 players' cap hits somewhere around the total of those 3, which is $26.406M, or a little more, in the $30M range for those 3 is a more likely outcome if they're all extended.

But, I'm not worried about the 49ers cap going forward post BA & Brock extensions, cause I've explained it all already, shown how we can keep our core together for a while, plus Trent likely will retire in 2026, which saves cap room, plus they can save money by moving on from Brendel if they find a C or someone steps up as the new C from the young guys we've picked.


Nice work as always!

Thanks my friend, I forgot 1 thing, if a team can use a PS QB as the emergency 3rd QB & it doesn't count against the players max games played in 1 season(3), or count against the max of 2 players that can be elevated, then I'm all for releasing Brandon Allen, who won't go thru waivers, so they can make a hand shake agreement like when vets get cut so teams can put guys(injured) on short term IR, this is what I'd do, keep just Brock & Dobbs on the 53, Allen on the PS, as he's GTD $400k of his 2024 base salary already, so the 49ers would get back $383,400 of the $400k if they give him the max salary of $21,300 a week, plus if they cut him they save $840k, since he got a $300k signing bonus, so that would come back in 2025 as part of their adjustments/credits.

They also need to payback players' per game roster bonuses, like Hargrave($44,118), Deebo & Trent($88,235 each), Collins & Greenlaw($29,412 each), Campbell($120k), Odum($60k), Gross-Matos($150k), & Brandon Allen($480k), so the 49ers need a decent amount to pay these 9 players back, not sure the exact amount, on my iPad right now in bed, late here in NY.

Thanks and your so complete, gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling about the cap. You explained the Timeline so well and made me think about the O line differently to keep the cap straight.

I do think they will spend on TWs replacement but we just need to get lucky on drafting other Olineman.

If we spend capital on the line we would have to look to reliable skill players to take over for the expensive stars. Wth Brock being shorter we are going to have to give him more time to find his reads and time for plays to develope.

Thanks for all you do..At first I thought wow what a long post then I saw it was you, best read I've had in a while. Nice job!!
Originally posted by bassmanr:
Thanks and your so complete, gives me the warm and fuzzy feeling about the cap. You explained the Timeline so well and made me think about the O line differently to keep the cap straight.

I do think they will spend on TWs replacement but we just need to get lucky on drafting other Olineman.

If we spend capital on the line we would have to look to reliable skill players to take over for the expensive stars. Wth Brock being shorter we are going to have to give him more time to find his reads and time for plays to develope.

Thanks for all you do..At first I thought wow what a long post then I saw it was you, best read I've had in a while. Nice job!!

Thanks,I appreciate it, I'm here to try & calm ppl down when it comes to someone, whether here, or a media member claims we're not good cap wise, so while I hate seeing so many inaccurate reports I do have fun correcting them.
Originally posted by AB81Rules:

This is 100% true, the reason there's a draft, free agency, and salary cap, in which teams still need to spend a certain percentage of the cap in cash, the NFL is set to have as much parity as any league.

Look at the NBA for example, there's like 5-8 top teams in the league, that have pretty much all the MAJOR Star players, Super Teams, going 2-3 deep on Max contracts, but they did implement a new thing that will make it harder to have 2+ max contracts, unless the team wants to pay $100's of millions of dollars in tax penalties, like GS, PHX, LAC, etc....

There's literally no parity in MLB, there's no cap, there is a luxury tax that you can't go over, if you do, like with the NBA, you pay $100s of millions of dollars, you basically have the Yankees as one of the top 5 payrolls, then a team like the Athletics, or Orioles as bottom 5, even though Baltimore has a good team, as they drafted well, & developed those players, plus MLB has a minor league system, 6-7 teams per team(AAA, AA, High A, Low A, Rookie Ball, & 1-2 Dominican Summer League teams, Yankees have 2).

In the NHL there is a salary cap, but unlike the other 2 leagues with a cap(NFL & NBA), the players AAV/APY is their cap number each year, it's like with MLB for the most part, Aaron Judge's APY/AAV is $40M, which is what he gets paid each year thru 2031.

But back to the NFL, my point in why they have a draft, free agency, a cap is for parity, this is why we're seeing so many players signing elsewhere in the offseason, trades have become more common than they used to, they seem to be as common as NBA trades, except the whole taking on a large cap number for a 1st rd pick, teams will eat cap room to more picks for a player, like CAR did when we got CMC, while I remember CLE getting a 2nd rd pick for taking on Brock Osweiler's contract, but that type of deal doesn't happen much.

Plus look at all the revenue the NFL is pulling in, new TV deals with FOX, CBS for Sunday Afternoon Games, NBC for SNF, Peacock for FNF/Black Friday games, ESPN/ABC for MNF, Amazon Prime Video for TNF, & of course the huge NFL Sunday Ticket deal with YouTube TV/YouTube Premium Channels which is of course owned by Google, so every year the salary cap will go up, meaning players salaries will do so to, Goff now makes $53M a year, imagine what Brock may get next year? It'll end up being in the $50M+ a yr, but will be structured the way Bosa's is, low cap numbers in yrs 1-3, including the yr the extension was signed, so for Bosa that was 2023-2025, for Brock it'll be 2025-2027, then their cap hits go at or higher than their APY is.

Also each team is different when it comes to who or what position they will pay the most and least for, the 49ers value high paid QB, FB, WRs, TE, LT, EDGE, IDL, Off-Ball LB, & CB, they don't usually value a high end RB, but that changed when they acquired CMC, his actual APY is over $16M, but with us it's like $12M, they also don't value a high end C, LG, RG, & FS or SS, yes they've paid Jimmie Ward & Weston Richburg big money in the past, but they're more into low end deals, not something that will cripple the teams cap like a $20M a yr G, despite what fans want, and don't care if we go into cap hell for just 1 ring, it's not worth it, plus the majority of these big deals given out in FA, the teams end up regretting them, or the player gets cut or traded a yr or 2 into the deal.

When it comes to the OL, people need to realize that teams like to hoard them, as well as other positions, but with OL, there aren't a ton of quality, starting worthy OL on the market every year, and those tend to go for $16M-$20M a yr, something the 49ers will not pay a Guard, nor would I, that's ridiculous money for an IOL, so when you see them sign Brandon Parker & Chris Hubbard to cheap 1yr deals, who have starting experience, the 49ers got lucky they decided to take less to play here, well except for Eric Kendricks, who took less to go to Dallas, still pissed about that, that's why FA/New League Year needs to begin on the same day, no legal tampering period, so players don't back out of deals they agreed to.

As for the draft, obviously this is used to either fill holes, or draft for the future, even if you're the 49ers, a SB contender each year, as they took Pearsall, & Cowing who likely replace Jauan in 2025, & Deebo later on, I still see Deebo around as long as Kyle wants him to be, same with BA. They picks Puni, & Kingston because Banks won't be back if he's looking for $10M+ a yr, even average to below average IOL can get that kind of money now with the way the cap is going up by $20M a season, they drafted Mustapha IMO because they know Hufanga will be gone, they won't pay him top safety money, reason why they didn't sign one this offseason, like Justin Simmons, cause he's likely asking for way too much money, then at LB, they've drafted Graham, Winters, & Bethune in the past 2 drafts, so Dre may be gone, he's the one I think might stay, especially on a cheaper deal, and finally CB wise, Ward & Lenoir are UFAs after 2024, it'd be wise to extend Mooney now, cause they can save $9.148M in cap room, plus he's set to count $12.298M in 2025 as dead money, so they extend him now/before the season they have him locked into a new multi-year deal, & added cap room, Lenoir I'm 50/50 on what happens, if we can get him extended now, I'd do it, cause his price tag likely goes up next year, so that's why they drafted Green this year, and guys like Luter, & Womack in the last 2 drafts(2022 & 2023).

As for anyone interested in knowing where we'll likely be at when the season begins cap wise, I did a X/Twitter thread last night, idk how it'll look with the link, but I'll also explain here.

Basically the 49ers will be around $15M-$17M under the cap when the season begins, before a Aiyuk or Ward extension, they will get back that $18M on June 2nd, but I'm accounting for 71 total players(53-man roster, 16-man PS, & 1 PUP/Dre), so spots 52 & 53 will cost $795K each at minimum, so $1.59M total, then the PS can cost as much as $4,550,400 since the 49ers usually give the veterans they sign to the PS the max PS salary allowed, $21,300 a week this yr, while the 10 non vets with 2 or less accrued years get $16,800 a week.

I also went off of my 1st projection from after the draft, which gave me around $15.9M in cap room, so I'm estimating between $15M-$17M to begin, but remember we can extend Mooney to save $9.148M, and if they extend BA with a $25M signing bonus, they save $7.999M, which means they could have between $32.147M-$34.147M to begin 2024, with $5M set aside for in season roster moves, they'd likely carryover $27M-$29M of it.

As for 2025, I have them with 49 players signed, and $22.5M over a projected $280M cap, but they'll likely only have 30-34 players signed for 2025 when the season begins, & with myu roster I did I had them just $7.3M over, before BA's extension, this includes Mooney, cause he already counts $12.298M, and they can get his 2025 cap number at or a bit below that.

Now, when it comes to Aiyuk, what I would do is a $25M signing bonus, prorates at $5M a yr over 5yr, his 2024 cap hit is just $6.125M, saving the $7.999M I mentioned before, then for 2025, I think they can get his cap number in the $10M-$12M by doing a $10M option bonus in 2025, which they do with every big deal, each player gets a signing bonus & an option bonus the next year which is GTD already, but prorates, Bosa got a 3 tier bonus structure, $50M SB in 2023, $15.23M option bonus in 2024, & $29.015M option bonus in 2025, & Bosa has minimum salaries for each of the first 3yrs, including the yr he signed the extension, so 2023-2025, then it goes up in 2026 to over his APY at I think $40M or $42M, so they can do similar with BA, 3 tier bonus structure, minimum base salaries, all GTD like Bosa's, have his cap hits under his APY, which will be between $28M-$30M IMO.

So for 2025, the 49ers would be just $8.68M under a $280M cap, but with just 36 players signed, so with 51 they'd be around $3.92M over, this is assuming the deals for BA & Ward are what I'd do, & that we carryover between $27M-$29M, then they have options to create cap room in 2025.

The options to create cap room include CMC($8.596m w/extension), Deebo($12,344,423 w/extension), Kittle($10.516m w/extension), Trent($16.996m w/restructure), Hargrave($14.916m w/restructure), & Warner($13.116m w/restructure).

Before a Brock deal, the 49ers would have $94M in cap room in 2026 with 32 players signed, including 8 UDFAs they signed, but with 51 signed they'd have $77M in cap room, but it would likely take away around $35M in cap room for Brock, Mooney, & BA, but the $35M is just a guess, as I haven't done a mock deal for Brock, I'm assuming he gets the 3 tiered bonus structure, minimum base salaries all GTD at signing, with a huge signing bonus, & 2 option bonuses to help with the cap hits being lower than anyone expects, his cap hits wouldn't hit near his APY till 2028 if they do it like they did with Bosa.

So as I said in the thread, the next 3 yrs are just fine cap wise, they'll carryover a good amount of cap room into 2025, depending on how much they save from BAs expected extension, & a potential Mooney extension, while they'd be able to save more in 2025 by extending the likes of CMC, Deebo, & Kittle, I say these 3, because I don't see the 49ers getting rid of any of these 3, especially if they're 1. producing, 2. healthy, and 3. still among the best in the league, if so, they get extended, cause they count $13.625M for Kittle in 2026 in dead money, $8.493M for Deebo in 2026, & $4.288M for CMC in 2026, so they could get those 3 players' cap hits somewhere around the total of those 3, which is $26.406M, or a little more, in the $30M range for those 3 is a more likely outcome if they're all extended.

But, I'm not worried about the 49ers cap going forward post BA & Brock extensions, cause I've explained it all already, shown how we can keep our core together for a while, plus Trent likely will retire in 2026, which saves cap room, plus they can save money by moving on from Brendel if they find a C or someone steps up as the new C from the young guys we've picked.


Oddly enough, I believe MLB has the most diversity in championship winners (and participants) the last 24 years vs other sports, but def more than football. Payroll certainly helps the bigger teams, but I think the nature of baseball with the larger ecosystem of player development, long season, etc leads to more variables for different outcomes. Sadly MLB owners have been cutting back on the minors to you know save aka make more money so that sucks.

As someone who is old enough to remember the league back from the 80's and 90's I actually think the cap hurts the league overall and the players, but the winners are the owners. From a purely financial standpoint the owners are raking it in more than ever, but the players get crumbs in comparison.

Now people will say that if there was no cap you would have 3-4 owners stacking their teams every year etc.... but the last 24 years has been mostly the patriots and chiefs with about 6 other teams sprinkled in so imo not much different. Whoever is lucky enough to find that QB is easily the best contender year in and year out (Brady, Mahomes) and they have a massive advantage.

Why? A few thoughts of the top of my head....The cap limits what teams can really do to build. But if you have a QB you simply throw what you can around him every year. If there was no cap a team with a mediocre QB could try to really load up elsewhere to compensate etc. Kyle and John tried with Jimmy, but wasn't good enough etc.

Another thought is player development really lags behind like in other sports. I think it is very rushed because of how physical the game is so most guys have a 5 year window etc so I get it, but a proper development league that works with post college/between college and nfl would be beneficial, but maybe not realistic. The newer CBA's keep limiting offseason work, but that's how you get better....I find it odd the players are for that. It benefits veterans and the higher end players, but hurts everyone else. The owners did a classic divide and conquer on the NFLPA.

I do wonder how the NFL would be with no cap or a system like MLB. If Jerry wants to spend 500 million on his roster, god bless, but he will be paying another big chunk into the league etc. But who could fault him. AB I must admit some bias. I am a native NY'er and Yankees fan. George Steinbrenner was a gift from the baseball gods. Every owner should be like him. His son is typical owner who only view it as a business. As long as fans keep filling the seats and hes making profits he can enjoy his golf and horse racing.. (he isn't even a huge baseball fan lol)
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Oddly enough, I believe MLB has the most diversity in championship winners (and participants) the last 24 years vs other sports, but def more than football. Payroll certainly helps the bigger teams, but I think the nature of baseball with the larger ecosystem of player development, long season, etc leads to more variables for different outcomes. Sadly MLB owners have been cutting back on the minors to you know save aka make more money so that sucks.

As someone who is old enough to remember the league back from the 80's and 90's I actually think the cap hurts the league overall and the players, but the winners are the owners. From a purely financial standpoint the owners are raking it in more than ever, but the players get crumbs in comparison.

Now people will say that if there was no cap you would have 3-4 owners stacking their teams every year etc.... but the last 24 years has been mostly the patriots and chiefs with about 6 other teams sprinkled in so imo not much different. Whoever is lucky enough to find that QB is easily the best contender year in and year out (Brady, Mahomes) and they have a massive advantage.

Why? A few thoughts of the top of my head....The cap limits what teams can really do to build. But if you have a QB you simply throw what you can around him every year. If there was no cap a team with a mediocre QB could try to really load up elsewhere to compensate etc. Kyle and John tried with Jimmy, but wasn't good enough etc.

Another thought is player development really lags behind like in other sports. I think it is very rushed because of how physical the game is so most guys have a 5 year window etc so I get it, but a proper development league that works with post college/between college and nfl would be beneficial, but maybe not realistic. The newer CBA's keep limiting offseason work, but that's how you get better....I find it odd the players are for that. It benefits veterans and the higher end players, but hurts everyone else. The owners did a classic divide and conquer on the NFLPA.

I do wonder how the NFL would be with no cap or a system like MLB. If Jerry wants to spend 500 million on his roster, god bless, but he will be paying another big chunk into the league etc. But who could fault him. AB I must admit some bias. I am a native NY'er and Yankees fan. George Steinbrenner was a gift from the baseball gods. Every owner should be like him. His son is typical owner who only view it as a business. As long as fans keep filling the seats and hes making profits he can enjoy his golf and horse racing.. (he isn't even a huge baseball fan lol)

The dark secret of why baseball doesn't have a cap isn't because the big spenders don't want it, it's the "low revenue" teams that don't want the salary floor.

As a Yankee fan myself I would disagree thst George was a gift. His dumbass was why the Yanks were terrible in the early 90s. Stick Michael was the key to the late 90s success. The issue today isn't a lack of spending, it's a lack of production from the farm system.

Football could really use a Larry Bird exemption for QBs.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Oddly enough, I believe MLB has the most diversity in championship winners (and participants) the last 24 years vs other sports, but def more than football. Payroll certainly helps the bigger teams, but I think the nature of baseball with the larger ecosystem of player development, long season, etc leads to more variables for different outcomes. Sadly MLB owners have been cutting back on the minors to you know save aka make more money so that sucks.

As someone who is old enough to remember the league back from the 80's and 90's I actually think the cap hurts the league overall and the players, but the winners are the owners. From a purely financial standpoint the owners are raking it in more than ever, but the players get crumbs in comparison.

Now people will say that if there was no cap you would have 3-4 owners stacking their teams every year etc.... but the last 24 years has been mostly the patriots and chiefs with about 6 other teams sprinkled in so imo not much different. Whoever is lucky enough to find that QB is easily the best contender year in and year out (Brady, Mahomes) and they have a massive advantage.

Why? A few thoughts of the top of my head....The cap limits what teams can really do to build. But if you have a QB you simply throw what you can around him every year. If there was no cap a team with a mediocre QB could try to really load up elsewhere to compensate etc. Kyle and John tried with Jimmy, but wasn't good enough etc.

Another thought is player development really lags behind like in other sports. I think it is very rushed because of how physical the game is so most guys have a 5 year window etc so I get it, but a proper development league that works with post college/between college and nfl would be beneficial, but maybe not realistic. The newer CBA's keep limiting offseason work, but that's how you get better....I find it odd the players are for that. It benefits veterans and the higher end players, but hurts everyone else. The owners did a classic divide and conquer on the NFLPA.

I do wonder how the NFL would be with no cap or a system like MLB. If Jerry wants to spend 500 million on his roster, god bless, but he will be paying another big chunk into the league etc. But who could fault him. AB I must admit some bias. I am a native NY'er and Yankees fan. George Steinbrenner was a gift from the baseball gods. Every owner should be like him. His son is typical owner who only view it as a business. As long as fans keep filling the seats and hes making profits he can enjoy his golf and horse racing.. (he isn't even a huge baseball fan lol)

Yeah it does seem there is more parity in baseball when it comes to who wins the World Series, there, to my knowledge, haven't been a real dynasty, except the cheating Astros.

The cap does hurt the players more than the owners, players get paid what would be chump change compared these billionaire owners like Jerry Jones, Robert Kraft, etc... But players have seen a huge raise since the cap started in I think '94, when it was like $30M, now it's $255.4M in 2024, a huge jump, the funny thing is had we not gone through a pandemic, the cap would be closer to $300M by now, or at least in the $280M range this year, $300M next year, but the cap stayed flat for I believe 2020, & didn't go up much the next year, finally after the pandemic slowed down, fans were back in the stadiums, then the cap was going up, it's really when those new TV deals kicked in last year did the cap see a huge jump from 2023's $224.8M all the way to $255.4M, a $30.6M raise/jump, no wonder Jared Goff got $53M a yr, and WRs like St. Brown got $28M, & AJ Brown got $32M, or Robert Hunt a G getting $20M a yr, it's just crazy, also remember that fans love to complain about how much a player makes, yet we hardly hear, at least publicly, the fans complaining about owners making millions-billions off the players, like in College, the HC, the Teachers, the AD, etc... all make millions a year off of student athletes, who the NCAA doesn't want to be paid, but it's perfectly fine for someone to get $10M+ a yr as a HC in college, the one thing that all fans complain about, rightfully so, is the price of game tickets, they seem to raise every year.

It is crazy how it's mostly been the Pats & Chiefs over the past 24yrs to win it all, with some teams mixed in.

Yes, the cap does limit what a team can do big time, you can';t keep everyone, not like in baseball if the Yankees wanted to do so.

The issue with player development IMO is there's no minor league system like in Baseball & Hockey where these kids are getting valuable playing time, even if it's not against the best in the MLB & NHL, but still helps develop these guys.

Something I forgot to mention was if there was no cap or draft, the top players would always go to like 5-10 teams, with a cap & draft, you have parity, but it does take a few yrs to develop a guy, 3yrs at least before you can call a pick a bust IMHO.

As for Jerry Jones, he'd probably sign everyone he wanted to sign, but actually knowing how they are in FA, they may not sign big names every year, and yes Steinbrenner was a gift for us Yanks fans, too bad we can't seem to get past the Astros in the playoffs.
Share 49ersWebzone