Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
Originally posted by tjd808185:
I still give Joe the edge because Brady has had a longer career due to hit the easier rules. But if Joe is Jordan, Brady is Lebron. They're both great.
But Lebron hasn't won more championships than Jordan.
The salary cap and F/A also makes 5 that much more difficult.
wait ...wait...wait.....
Brady was not locked out in the middle of his prime.....
and the Salary cap evens all the teams out, it makes the QB position so much more important, Im not sure it HURTS QBs, it likely helps them. There is less super teams beating the hell out of each other.
This is a such an easy comparison.... Montana is not iron man, Brady is. Montana was not going to win by attrition and have a coach spend 15+ years to build 5 or 6 different teams him. How many more SBs could have been had Joe been healthy?
The NFC was not nearly as weak as the AFC has been either, the Pats ended up in some super bowls they would not have been in if the NFL was going to just pick the best 2 out of the league. They over achieved by getting hot. The 49er teams by comparison where hands down one of the two strongest teams in all of their Super Bowl runs.
This Pats Super Bowl team does not beat any of Montana's teams. Montana had more talent to work with...
I think you put Brady on those 49er teams, they likely win their games. Put Montana on the pats and they get the first 3...maybe they pick up an extra...but he is likely retired by the time they loose to the Giants.
IF i need a QB for one playoff run, Ill take Joe....if i am going to build a Franchise...duh.... i am grabbing Brady.