Originally posted by NinerGM:
Thanks for the education here .... so if we continue to play Tampa 2, Mangini is going to need to generate more pressure. IMHO, I don't think we have the horses to have consistent pressure with 4 down linemen, I just don't - especially against max protect. We will see this counter formation from AZ. There's no way Arians is going to ignore the Steeler tape and use the exact formations with technically a better/bigger receiver like Fitzgerald.
Is it possible to switch back to pattern matching in one week?
The 49ers would have to be practicing it to switch back to it. I don't think Mangini can just say, "remember what you guys did in 2014? We have 4 days to refresh our memory and go back to it". Who knows whether they've been drilling it in practice. Of the new key contributors to the defense, it's Acker and Tartt that I have yet to see in a pattern match scheme. ARI will use stacked/bunched WRs. If the 49ers don't pattern match, they will be subjected to pick plays if they are in man coverage. If ARI max protects, it's just more reason to PM. If ARI just sends out 3 routes, a PM scheme could get each WR double teamed, instead of having some defenders cover grass. Also, if they don't PM, then flood concepts start to become very effective for the offense.
This play is posted in the C&C thread, but I just wanted to highlight how pattern matching defeated a flood concept, out of a bunched formation. The WRs criss cross to their heart's content, then as the routes are distributed at different depths up the field, the defender in the best position matches up with that route. If the 49ers were in Tampa2 here, the CB along the sideline would get vertically stretched, much like Brock did on the deep pass to Wheaton.
Playing Tampa2 will limit what Mangini can do to generate pressure. He can't blitz and play Tampa2 - must rush 4. He can disguise who the 4th rusher is, and loop/stunt the rushers, but that's the bulk of what he can do to manufacture/scheme pressure.