Originally posted by STICKSandSTONES:Originally posted by Hard-Knock-Niner:Originally posted by Young2Rice:It does matter that it was pre-season.
See Glen Coffee, Korey Sheets and Clayton Thomas.
I'm confused. Over in the Purcell thread, guys are saying he tore it up in preseason so he should get a shot. It seems that the same argument used for one player is used against another, depending on who that player is. So which one is it?
I'm not trying to s**t stir or start a fire, it's just hard to follow the reasoning when there seems to be inconsistency in the application.
Everyone has there own opinions and there are examples for both sides. Best everyone just agree to disagree and look at potential and see what their opinion is.... my opinion anyway
I get the opinion bit, don't worry. I'm just seeing if we can work out what the real go is with the different arguments. There must be a pattern of preseason stars being busts in the real deal for people to say preseason means s**t. But, if that opinion is based on fewer examples and there's actually a greater proportion who do well in preseason and then go on to star or at least be decent, reliable performers in the NFL, then I'd say the logic is flawed. If more are busts than work out well, then I'd say the logic is sound.
There may be no immediate answer to that question, I just get inquisitive when I see the same argument used to substantiate different things.
[ Edited by Hard-Knock-Niner on Oct 23, 2015 at 9:11 PM ]