Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by theninermaniac:There were definitely plays designed to go to Kerley. The 4th down catch he made, he was the primary option on that side of the field. They ran 2 middle screens for Kerley that were not well blocked. Gabbert seems to look to him. I think this could be a testament to the role that Ellington was supposed to have in this offense. Imagine practicing in OTAs/TC with Ellington being featured, then he gets IR'ed right before the season starts and Kerley steps in. All throughout summer Gabbert was throwing to Ellington on these plays. So now the plays didn't change, but the player did. Hard to say who was at fault for the communication breakdowns.
Would love to get a breakdown on Kerley's game Monday night. He seems to be a great fit for Kelly's spread attack, and he made a bunch of great plays throughout the game. He also seemed to have a couple of communication breakdowns with Gabbert that could have resulted in INTs. I guess it is to be expected with the limited amount of reps he's had with Gabbert. How in the world does he end up with 11 targets? Were we drawing up plays for him specifically, or was he the only one getting open? And where in the world did the $10M man Torrey Smith disappear to? All I remember from him is the two dirt ball screen passes going his way.
Is Kerley the best receiving threat on the Niners moving forward? It seems after game 1 that he will be the most potent WR threat on the team.
No idea what's up with Torrey. He had what, two downfield targets (caught one, no chance on the other) and two WR screens behind the LoS? The staff needs to find a way for Gabbert to find Torrey. He needs to be a threat or else defenses will start to creep forward.
Torrey did also have the drop on a crossing pattern in the red zone too, so 5 total targets. To me, in 35 passes he should have at least 8-9. But, coverage also dictates where the ball goes, like TO catching 20 balls on Jerry Rice day...
If there is one thing Gabbert doesn't do, is force feed the ball. I definitely noticed that Gabbert uses his eyes well to look off defenders and go through his progression. I think his misfires are because he lacks confidence in his arm (or sometimes receivers). I also think that will change as he gets to work in a clean pocket for the first time in his career. His confidence will build behind a good Oline, and his trust in his receivers will grow. I see a lot of similarities between Gabbert and our old pal Alex Smith. The both are intelligent and mobile QBs with decent enough arm talent. And they both got the crap kicked out of them early in their career with horrible supporting casts. And just like Alex, if we can give Gabbert good protection with a sound game plan, he can execute and win some games for us.