There are 169 users in the forums
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
They work together of course like any good franchise does but you sound like an idiot if you actually think Kyle runs everything
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by FredFlintstone:
They work together of course like any good franchise does but you sound like an idiot if you actually think Kyle runs everything
spare me the ad hominems please; so again, let me ask - if these FA decisions are made jointly, why is Lynch getting criticism and Kyle gets none ?
Originally posted by tankle104:
I hope we can sign lake Tomlinson for cheap to replace burford. Dude is trash, which sucks cause I had high hopes for him. We need a swing tackle too. We wasted a roster spot on a tackle last year cause they couldn't play both sides. I have no clue had moore keeps making the roster.
Originally posted by NCommand:Remember the fit you had when they let him walk in FA and he suddenly became indispensable?
Originally posted by tankle104:
I hope we can sign lake Tomlinson for cheap to replace burford. Dude is trash, which sucks cause I had high hopes for him. We need a swing tackle too. We wasted a roster spot on a tackle last year cause they couldn't play both sides. I have no clue had moore keeps making the roster.
Tomlinson sucks though. I wouldn't mind him as a backup to Banks though. Maybe even push him. He needs some real competition to keep him sharp.
Originally posted by 49erFaithfullest:
Trust Lynch and his decisions...seems like their taking Brandon Staley inputs with FA signings as well
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Remember the fit you had when they let him walk in FA and he suddenly became indispensable?
Originally posted by JEP83:
Does any one else feel like there's more one year contracts than normal?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Remember the fit you had when they let him walk in FA and he suddenly became indispensable?
It'll be the same for Banks. If Banks is resigned he's terrible and not worth money. If he's let go he is indispensable and a huge loss.
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Remember the fit you had when they let him walk in FA and he suddenly became indispensable?
It'll be the same for Banks. If Banks is resigned he's terrible and not worth money. If he's let go he is indispensable and a huge loss.
With just two years under his belt I am quite happy with him. Not so committed to Burford but hoping that he can break through. Maybe picking up a vet like Tomlinson might help him.
Originally posted by English:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Remember the fit you had when they let him walk in FA and he suddenly became indispensable?
It'll be the same for Banks. If Banks is resigned he's terrible and not worth money. If he's let go he is indispensable and a huge loss.
With just two years under his belt I am quite happy with him. Not so committed to Burford but hoping that he can break through. Maybe picking up a vet like Tomlinson might help him.
Originally posted by Kolohe:
I wouldn't be mad if they picked up Laken Tomlinson, I think he would be much better in SF. The only problem would be where would he play, because he's been playing LG his whole NFL career?