There are 168 users in the forums
John Lynch - 49ers GM
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:30 PM
- Dirtydonedirtcheap69
- Member
- Posts: 755
I really think Pearsall could be an absolute badass. I'm not sure he'll stay healthy or have the longest career but I would be surprised if he has less than 600-700 yards next season. I could see 4-6 years with more than 700 yards of production. To me that's my floor expectation, he's f'ing good.
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:32 PM
- lamontb
- Veteran
- Posts: 30,970
- NFL Pick 'em
Yea. I am surprised that they didn't get a big fatty to stuff the run. Run defense gonna be suspect.
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:39 PM
- GLT49ers
- Member
- Posts: 596
I would give the draft a B+
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:48 PM
- LifelongNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,078
Originally posted by mcwoot:
Originally posted by dj43:
All the OLs that would be first-year starters were gone by #31. At that point, you look for BPA in a position of need. At this very early point, it looks like they did that. We could quibble over 10-15 slots but they picked quality players.
They just picked an OG from a quality program that will add some depth.
We've got plenty of OL depth. The problem is they are starting.
Aren't starting/developing.
In the last 5 drafts we've taken McKivitz, Banks, Moore, Burford, Zakelj, and now have added Puni and Kingston. Drafted between the 2nd - 6th rounds, with most being day 3 guys. The problem is, we aren't getting guys who would be middle of the pack at their positions. Some may argue that we draft too low,but other teams are getting quality starters out of their later picks. We just haven't seen our guys amount to much. I can't fathom McKivitz getting much better. He's a swing tackle to me at this point. Moore and Burford are JAGS. Banks is an okay starter but not a world beater. Who knows what we have in Zakelj. We will see if Puni adds anything, bit to me our current guys have peaked.
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:52 PM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 68,319
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:hopefully Puni and Kingston and make us a playoff team
Originally posted by mcwoot:
Originally posted by dj43:
All the OLs that would be first-year starters were gone by #31. At that point, you look for BPA in a position of need. At this very early point, it looks like they did that. We could quibble over 10-15 slots but they picked quality players.
They just picked an OG from a quality program that will add some depth.
We've got plenty of OL depth. The problem is they are starting.
Aren't starting/developing.
In the last 5 drafts we've taken McKivitz, Banks, Moore, Burford, Zakelj, and now have added Puni and Kingston. Drafted between the 2nd - 6th rounds, with most being day 3 guys. The problem is, we aren't getting guys who would be middle of the pack at their positions. Some may argue that we draft too low,but other teams are getting quality starters out of their later picks. We just haven't seen our guys amount to much. I can't fathom McKivitz getting much better. He's a swing tackle to me at this point. Moore and Burford are JAGS. Banks is an okay starter but not a world beater. Who knows what we have in Zakelj. We will see if Puni adds anything, bit to me our current guys have peaked.
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:52 PM
- LifelongNiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,078
On the draft, it looks really good. Should be more explosive and harder to neutralized on offense. But we likely will face the same PP issues. Maybe the plan is for a strong interior,which may help out McKivitz and Brock can step up to avoid the outsids rushers.
It seems we also didn't go for that true DJ Jones replacement. To their credit, this looks like it will be far better than 2022 and 2023. No longer looking for guys to develop. We have multiple immediate contributors and potentially an upgrade special teams unit.
It seems we also didn't go for that true DJ Jones replacement. To their credit, this looks like it will be far better than 2022 and 2023. No longer looking for guys to develop. We have multiple immediate contributors and potentially an upgrade special teams unit.
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:54 PM
- ninerfan4life
- Veteran
- Posts: 25,205
- NFL Pick 'em
John Lynch confirms that the 49ers were in no-mans-land when it came to finding a starting-caliber tackle in this draft:
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 27, 2024
"When you're drafting 31st, it's oftentimes tough to find tackles you really love."
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:07 PM
- Cisco0623
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,650
Originally posted by ninerfan4life:
John Lynch confirms that the 49ers were in no-mans-land when it came to finding a starting-caliber tackle in this draft:
— David Lombardi (@LombardiHimself) April 27, 2024
"When you're drafting 31st, it's oftentimes tough to find tackles you really love."
So draft more than 1 every 2 years that is in the top 2 rounds lol
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:24 PM
- Cosmo
- Member
- Posts: 1,595
Originally posted by lamontb:
Yea. I am surprised that they didn't get a big fatty to stuff the run. Run defense gonna be suspect.
Seriously. It's tough to love every pick in the draft and even if you do, some will always be whiffs. It was surprising to see the team draft 2 WRs though, I thought that position was one of their greatest strengths. I understand the BPA philosophy, and hope they fill other needs in FA.
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:26 PM
- Big_Daddy
- Veteran
- Posts: 1,781
Originally posted by dj43:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
I like the draft a lot more at this point after seeing it play out more. But I still feel it's top heavy on gadget players that Kyle likes. Not enough meat and potatoes. Offensive line on the right side and Defensive line interior were needs. As is LB with the Greenlaw injury. Especially ignoring Offensive line with all but 1 pick up until now is unconscionable. We needed more than 1 offensive linemen. Multiple positions. Maybe even higher. I like the one we got. But we continue to ignore this. There is no way you could watch this team and think we need 1 Offensive linemen in the draft. It's just unbelievable. Some good players but still missing on needs. At some point they have to FORCE picking Offensive line. Many and high up too. We can't keep doing this. At this point the one we got has to work out, stay healthy and play multiple positions. That's a lot to ask.
All the OLs that would be first-year starters were gone by #31. At that point, you look for BPA in a position of need. At this very early point, it looks like they did that. We could quibble over 10-15 slots but they picked quality players.
They just picked an OG from a quality program that will add some depth.
Maybe the OTs were underwhelming at #31 but we'll see if in a year, tackles we passed on start shining. It's a clear need and it was supposed to be deep.
at #31 tho is a great place to find top shelf centers. Kyle went from paying money for that dude from the giants and Alex Mack to brendel. Would have been nice to try to upgrade there.
overall draft seems ok. If we land a couple of contributors it will be considered a success.
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:26 PM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 68,319
Originally posted by Cisco0623:glad you aren't the GM
So draft more than 1 every 2 years that is in the top 2 rounds lol
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:27 PM
- 9ers4eva
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,179
Originally posted by Cosmo:
Seriously. It's tough to love every pick in the draft and even if you do, some will always be whiffs. It was surprising to see the team draft 2 WRs though, I thought that position was one of their greatest strengths. I understand the BPA philosophy, and hope they fill other needs in FA.
Got the NT as an udfa.
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:29 PM
- 9ers4eva
- Veteran
- Posts: 19,179
Originally posted by Big_Daddy:
Maybe the OTs were underwhelming at #31 but we'll see if in a year, tackles we passed on start shining. It's a clear need and it was supposed to be deep.
at #31 tho is a great place to find top shelf centers. Kyle went from paying money for that dude from the giants and Alex Mack to brendel. Would have been nice to try to upgrade there.
overall draft seems ok. If we land a couple of contributors it will be considered a success.
Thing is the top shelf centers went 44 and 51. So the league as a whole saw them as mid 2 level.
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:42 PM
- bud49
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,241
I am not impressed with the draft picks at all. But I guess they know what they are doing thats why I'm on the couch and the are in the war room. But please other than Brock we don't need a repeat of the 2022 draft.
Looks like everyone is googly over the Rams and Cardinals and Seahags draft picks.
Looks like everyone is googly over the Rams and Cardinals and Seahags draft picks.
Apr 27, 2024 at 5:45 PM
- tankle104
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,812
Originally posted by lamontb:
Yea. I am surprised that they didn't get a big fatty to stuff the run. Run defense gonna be suspect.
I'm hoping that having Huf back will help with that. The new DT we got should be good and Floyd is a much better edge setter than young. So we should be improved but who knows.
we have a lot of vets and even older rookies this year. Locker room will be interesting. Very interesting team for a third year qb to lead.