49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He hasn't proven he can win the big game so far.

He proved it in the 2019 NFCCG.

You have a choice - you can either admit he can win the big game by acknowledging the 2019 NFCCG, or you can *only* talk about SB54 and have to stop including the 2021 NFCCG as part of your claim.

You don't get to hypocritically use a double standard about which NFCCG counts as a big game.

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He hasn't proven he can win the big game so far.

He proved it in the 2019 NFCCG.

You have a choice - you can either admit he can win the big game by acknowledging the 2019 NFCCG, or you can *only* talk about SB54 and have to stop including the 2021 NFCCG as part of your claim.

You don't get to hypocritically use a double standard about which NFCCG counts as a big game.

Mcvay can win the big game.

Originally posted by tjd808185:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
FWIW we didn't pass up on Stafford, he's wanted to play in LA for the past two yrs. Det and LA had a relationship in their FOs and moving Goff was part of the equation as well.

I mean DC reportedly offer their 1st and "more immediate help than what the Lions landed"

League source gives opinion on #Lions decision to take the #Rams deal for Matthew Stafford: "The Rams were screwed with a bad contract on (Jared) Goff and the #Lions helped them and don't even get a good pick this year. The Washington offer was better."

— IG: JosinaAnderson (@JosinaAnderson) January 31, 2021

Panther's gave up their 8th overall pick and then some according to Breer.

End of the day he was going to LA and the DET GM (former LA FO) did LA a solid.

Did we pass on Manning or did he just want to play in Denver end of the day? I can't remember how that went down...Brady was a miss for sure.

And why do you think Stafford was high on McVay? He wa.nted him, they were in sell it all to win now. When you come at someone luke warm that's the response you get back

Out org has the tendency to out a value tag on someone. We even did it with Shanny's love child and ended up the younger, cheaper available now option over him

He was high on him because he's a damn good QB. There was nothing lukewarm from SF, they were told nothing was in the works and to check back after the weekend. Kyle said it, reports said it. In the end Stafford wanted to play in LA, his wife talked about it a year before it happened. Det and LA had a relationship in the FO. They turned down better deals.

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
In the BIG GAMES he's a big time CHOKER.

Your definition of big games is absurd.

You CANNOT call the 2021 NFCGG a "big game" and simultaneously dismiss the 2019 NFCCG as not being a big game. You just reveal your pathetic hypocritical agenda by doing that.

OK he won 1 NFCCG and then CHOKED in the Super Bowl after that. With a lead.

Against a KC team that had repeatedly shown they could score 21 points in 3 minutes against anyone no matter the score.

Sometimes the other teams just make more plays. If Dan Bunz doesn't make the play of his career Bill Walsh loses SB16. If Jennings picks Montana instead of dropping the pass Walsh loses SB23. Would Walsh's coaching mind be any less brilliant if he was 1-2 in his 3 Super Bowls? Nope.

Walsh blows a 20 point lead in SB16 if Bunz doesn't make that tackle, BTW. What a choke artist!

Wait did walsh lose a super bowl?

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
* Choked in Super Bowl as OC with a big lead.

* Choked in Super Bowl with a lead.

* Choked in the NFCCG with a lead.

Not a big game coach. If you are up in big games he routinely finds ways to lose.

Facts are facts guys.

quit being a troll and looking for a response.

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
He hasn't proven he can win the big game so far.

He proved it in the 2019 NFCCG.

You have a choice - you can either admit he can win the big game by acknowledging the 2019 NFCCG, or you can *only* talk about SB54 and have to stop including the 2021 NFCCG as part of your claim.

You don't get to hypocritically use a double standard about which NFCCG counts as a big game.

Mcvay can win the big game.

Thanks for admitting you are a cowardly hypocrite who cannot own up to your fallacy of logic. I'll be blocking your annoying ass now. Enjoy your abject misery as a hateful fan.

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
In the BIG GAMES he's a big time CHOKER.

Your definition of big games is absurd.

You CANNOT call the 2021 NFCGG a "big game" and simultaneously dismiss the 2019 NFCCG as not being a big game. You just reveal your pathetic hypocritical agenda by doing that.

OK he won 1 NFCCG and then CHOKED in the Super Bowl after that. With a lead.

Against a KC team that had repeatedly shown they could score 21 points in 3 minutes against anyone no matter the score.

Sometimes the other teams just make more plays. If Dan Bunz doesn't make the play of his career Bill Walsh loses SB16. If Jennings picks Montana instead of dropping the pass Walsh loses SB23. Would Walsh's coaching mind be any less brilliant if he was 1-2 in his 3 Super Bowls? Nope.

Walsh blows a 20 point lead in SB16 if Bunz doesn't make that tackle, BTW. What a choke artist!

Wait did walsh lose a super bowl?

Only because his players.... get this.... executed his plays better.

My point is that he would have been no less of a brilliant coach if the Bengals win SB16 27-26 if Bunz doesn't make that remarkable tackle.

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
In the BIG GAMES he's a big time CHOKER.

Your definition of big games is absurd.

You CANNOT call the 2021 NFCGG a "big game" and simultaneously dismiss the 2019 NFCCG as not being a big game. You just reveal your pathetic hypocritical agenda by doing that.

OK he won 1 NFCCG and then CHOKED in the Super Bowl after that. With a lead.

Against a KC team that had repeatedly shown they could score 21 points in 3 minutes against anyone no matter the score.

Sometimes the other teams just make more plays. If Dan Bunz doesn't make the play of his career Bill Walsh loses SB16. If Jennings picks Montana instead of dropping the pass Walsh loses SB23. Would Walsh's coaching mind be any less brilliant if he was 1-2 in his 3 Super Bowls? Nope.

Walsh blows a 20 point lead in SB16 if Bunz doesn't make that tackle, BTW. What a choke artist!

Wait did walsh lose a super bowl?

10-4 post season record would suggest he lost some "Big" games

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
In the BIG GAMES he's a big time CHOKER.

Your definition of big games is absurd.

You CANNOT call the 2021 NFCGG a "big game" and simultaneously dismiss the 2019 NFCCG as not being a big game. You just reveal your pathetic hypocritical agenda by doing that.

OK he won 1 NFCCG and then CHOKED in the Super Bowl after that. With a lead.

Against a KC team that had repeatedly shown they could score 21 points in 3 minutes against anyone no matter the score.

Sometimes the other teams just make more plays. If Dan Bunz doesn't make the play of his career Bill Walsh loses SB16. If Jennings picks Montana instead of dropping the pass Walsh loses SB23. Would Walsh's coaching mind be any less brilliant if he was 1-2 in his 3 Super Bowls? Nope.

Walsh blows a 20 point lead in SB16 if Bunz doesn't make that tackle, BTW. What a choke artist!

Wait did walsh lose a super bowl?

10-4 post season record would suggest he lost some "Big" games

3-0 in the superbowl says he knows how to finish

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
10-4 post season record would suggest he lost some "Big" games

Walsh lost an NFCCG, and also had two of the most embarrassing blowout losses in 49er history. Still a brilliant coach.

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by jcs:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
In the BIG GAMES he's a big time CHOKER.

Your definition of big games is absurd.

You CANNOT call the 2021 NFCGG a "big game" and simultaneously dismiss the 2019 NFCCG as not being a big game. You just reveal your pathetic hypocritical agenda by doing that.

OK he won 1 NFCCG and then CHOKED in the Super Bowl after that. With a lead.

Against a KC team that had repeatedly shown they could score 21 points in 3 minutes against anyone no matter the score.

Sometimes the other teams just make more plays. If Dan Bunz doesn't make the play of his career Bill Walsh loses SB16. If Jennings picks Montana instead of dropping the pass Walsh loses SB23. Would Walsh's coaching mind be any less brilliant if he was 1-2 in his 3 Super Bowls? Nope.

Walsh blows a 20 point lead in SB16 if Bunz doesn't make that tackle, BTW. What a choke artist!

Wait did walsh lose a super bowl?

10-4 post season record would suggest he lost some "Big" games

3-0 in the superbowl says he knows how to finish

So losing before the super bowl says he doesn't.

Originally posted by jcs:
3-0 in the superbowl says he knows how to finish

He sure knew how to go out there and help Bunz make that tackle. 100% coaching, of course. Had zero to do with Bunz at all.

This is the problem with absolute statements that ignore context and the myriad of variables.

Originally posted by Young2Owens:
SanDiego doesn't know what choking is. You wanna see a choke? Rewatch Pats Seahawks SB

or McVay vs NE lol.

complaining that Kyle CHOKED vs NE who beats f**king everyone for over a two decades is funny as s**t too. Never mind he wasn't the head coach and didn't give up 500 yards of offense & blow a 20+ lead. Last I checked Quinn was the HC and had final say. That's like b***hing that it was just Greg Norman blowing the game and Harbs had NOTHING to do with anything BUT still giving Harbs all the credit for winning all those games lol cherry picking b******t.

Let's not factor in that Kyle dialed up a play where we had Sanders open and there for the late go ahead TD, only to have Jimmy totally butt f**k the throw....SD is trolling and people are feeding into it. There's no context in his comments for a reason.

Originally posted by captveg:
Thanks for admitting you are a cowardly hypocrite who cannot oqn up to your fallacy of logic. I'll be blocking your annoying ass now. Enjoy your abject misery as a hateful fan.

SD loved Harbs....so he must be a CHOKER too, I mean that's how it works right?

people think winning a SB is easy it kinda boggles my mind