49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by captveg:

Originally posted by dmax:
When the wr got up and started that fist signal,any good head coach worth his salt would have said " hmmm that's odd.. LET ME CHALLENGE THAT

You assume Kyle can see the WR do that from where he was on the sideline. He more than likely couldn't considering where he was on the sideline and where the catch was made. So, again, he has to rely on other people. Can't rely on the defensive players because they ALWAYS say the WR didn't make the catch. Then Kyle sees one replay from an angle that seems like he made the catch. Then his time was up. It sucks, but this is the very reason the league is trying to implement self-reviews in these circumstances, because it's incredibly difficult on the HC to make a viable determination in such a limited time without a lot of information. The league failed at that here, too.

Hufunga had a clear view of the ball hitting the ground and didn't say s**t to the coaches or bring anything up is a big red flag to me.

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

Oh more than a few...which is a loser mentality

Originally posted by dmax:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

Oh more than a few...which is a loser mentality

Yep. The excuse is "we don't want to go back to the Chip Kelly / Jim Tomsula era". As if getting rid of Kyle automatically signals the dawn of the Dennis Erickson era once again.

I've said it over many times on this forum. This fan base has become accustomed to the "almost Super" 49ers team. They think that as long as Shanny keeps getting us in the playoffs, it's A-OK because there's always a 'chance' we can win the big one.

Lame

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by dj43:
When I saw Smith get up and start punching his fists together, I told my wife, "he didn't catch it. Shanahan should challenge the catch." It just seemed such an obvious signal that he should have challenged on that basis alone, without needing to see the replays. (hindsight)

I'd agree he should have challenged, even without seeing a good replay given the impact of the play. That said it wasn't just Kyle's mistake. In the end it's still a bad call that the league's expedited review system failed to catch. To me, that's the greater failure.

How many times does Kyle get away these things ?

Doesn't know how to or when to challenge.
Doesn't know how to manage the clock in game time situations.
Doesn't know when to go for it on 4th down.

this is basic coaching 101

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:
We're the 49ers, we should be complaining when our HC raises up the 2nd place trophy.. This ain't no Bring it On.

We aren't anyone…this isn't the 80s where you can just give everyone all the cash.

that's the great thing about today's NFL it's a year to year league where you can go from trash to the playoffs.

More power to you if you enjoy coming up short year in and year out. . .

Why are you still a fan then? Go be a KC fan if you think it's just cake to be a consistent Super Bowl champ.

We can name a handful of teams that have won MULTIPLE Superbowls since the last time we did. So it may be hard win one, but not as hard as some of you make it seem. Why don't you just go down the list starting with Denver in 98-99 then see how many teams won multiple times in that time span. You'll be surprised that it's quite a few. Just off the top of my head….Ravens, Patriots, Giants, Bucs, Broncos, Rams, Steelers, Chiefs, Packers. There might be some more but that's close to a third of the league.

too many excuses for this fan base…

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:
We're the 49ers, we should be complaining when our HC raises up the 2nd place trophy.. This ain't no Bring it On.

We aren't anyone…this isn't the 80s where you can just give everyone all the cash.

that's the great thing about today's NFL it's a year to year league where you can go from trash to the playoffs.

More power to you if you enjoy coming up short year in and year out. . .

Why are you still a fan then? Go be a KC fan if you think it's just cake to be a consistent Super Bowl champ.

We can name a handful of teams that have won MULTIPLE Superbowls since the last time we did. So it may be hard win one, but not as hard as some of you make it seem. Why don't you just go down the list starting with Denver in 98-99 then see how many teams won multiple times in that time span. You'll be surprised that it's quite a few. Just off the top of my head….Ravens, Patriots, Giants, Bucs, Broncos, Rams, Steelers, Chiefs, Packers. There might be some more but that's close to a third of the league.

too many excuses for this fan base…

Excuses ?

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by dmax:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

Oh more than a few...which is a loser mentality

Yep. The excuse is "we don't want to go back to the Chip Kelly / Jim Tomsula era". As if getting rid of Kyle automatically signals the dawn of the Dennis Erickson era once again.

I've said it over many times on this forum. This fan base has become accustomed to the "almost Super" 49ers team. They think that as long as Shanny keeps getting us in the playoffs, it's A-OK because there's always a 'chance' we can win the big one.

Lame

What's lame is your sorry ass posts. Lol

even the most casual fan knows SB aren't easy. If it was then every team would have multiple SBs

what a joke post from a so called fan..

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

I think you'll have to travel very far to find a 9ers fan who is actually happy we got knocked out of the playoffs. Just because some fans don't throw the toys out of the cot or post emotional outbursts doesn't mean they're happy about getting knocked out.

You make the playoffs = you have a chance to win the SB
You don't make the playoffs = you have no chance to win the SB

So yeah, I think a lot of 49er fans would be happy to finish the regular season at a minimum of 12-5 or 13-4 every year, it means we have a chance to win it every year.

After that there's zero guarantees, and we could go back through the playoff wins and losses of nearly every season for every SB team and say "if only that had gone the other way" or "damn that injury happened at the worst time". Very few teams would have won the SB without getting their fair share of lucky breaks at one time or another.

It's one thing to change because you genuinely need a change, but what so many posters are suggesting is a change for the sake of change and little thought beyond that.

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

So your expectation is to beat teams with better talent and better coaching?

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

So your expectation is to beat teams with better talent and better coaching?

do they even think things out before posting ?

Originally posted by dmax:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

Oh more than a few...which is a loser mentality

Same guys would have stuck with Marvin lewis. " he gets us to the playoffs every year!!!"

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Originally posted by dmax:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

Oh more than a few...which is a loser mentality

Same guys would have stuck with Marvin lewis. " he gets us to the playoffs every year!!!"

Getting to the playoffs and never winning a single playoff game is different than getting to the conference finals. Neither is a SB ring, but getting close is better than not. At least Kyle has won playoff games. Marvin Lewis is a different degree of fail.

Originally posted by DrEll:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 9moon:
We're the 49ers, we should be complaining when our HC raises up the 2nd place trophy.. This ain't no Bring it On.

We aren't anyone…this isn't the 80s where you can just give everyone all the cash.

that's the great thing about today's NFL it's a year to year league where you can go from trash to the playoffs.

More power to you if you enjoy coming up short year in and year out. . .

Why are you still a fan then? Go be a KC fan if you think it's just cake to be a consistent Super Bowl champ.

We can name a handful of teams that have won MULTIPLE Superbowls since the last time we did. So it may be hard win one, but not as hard as some of you make it seem. Why don't you just go down the list starting with Denver in 98-99 then see how many teams won multiple times in that time span. You'll be surprised that it's quite a few. Just off the top of my head….Ravens, Patriots, Giants, Bucs, Broncos, Rams, Steelers, Chiefs, Packers. There might be some more but that's close to a third of the league.

too many excuses for this fan base…

Can also look at how many of those champions had HoF QBs.

Originally posted by JaggedJ:

Originally posted by BoldRedandGold:
I think a lot of posters would be happy if we go 12-5, 13-4 every year but never win a Superbowl.

That's where I feel we are. We don't make enough splash one year signings to have overwhelming talent to overcome the coaching deficiencies needed to win.

Unless purdy is Joe/Tom 2 I don't believe shanahan can win 4 games in a row and call them all correctly against 4 teams with equal or more talent and as good or better coaching.

I think you'll have to travel very far to find a 9ers fan who is actually happy we got knocked out of the playoffs. Just because some fans don't throw the toys out of the cot or post emotional outbursts doesn't mean they're happy about getting knocked out.

You make the playoffs = you have a chance to win the SB
You don't make the playoffs = you have no chance to win the SB

So yeah, I think a lot of 49er fans would be happy to finish the regular season at a minimum of 12-5 or 13-4 every year, it means we have a chance to win it every year.

After that there's zero guarantees, and we could go back through the playoff wins and losses of nearly every season for every SB team and say "if only that had gone the other way" or "damn that injury happened at the worst time". Very few teams would have won the SB without getting their fair share of lucky breaks at one time or another.

It's one thing to change because you genuinely need a change, but what so many posters are suggesting is a change for the sake of change and little thought beyond that.

imma keep it 💯. anyone who thinks that if you dont win the SB every year, you should fire the coach is absolutely stupid. absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

Originally posted by DrEll:
We can name a handful of teams that have won MULTIPLE Superbowls since the last time we did. So it may be hard win one, but not as hard as some of you make it seem. Why don't you just go down the list starting with Denver in 98-99 then see how many teams won multiple times in that time span. You'll be surprised that it's quite a few. Just off the top of my head….Ravens, Patriots, Giants, Bucs, Broncos, Rams, Steelers, Chiefs, Packers. There might be some more but that's close to a third of the league.

too many excuses for this fan base…

Who should the fan base hire after firing Kyle?