Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
My one KS critique is as good as he is with the playsheet, he can call games tight with his decision making. Like the Juice up the gut, then punt in plus territory sequence in the NFCCG. We had a bot in real time telling us, that KS was lowering our win odds as it was happening. He should lean more into the analytics imo. Especially with this talent we have now. Rather see CMC, BA, Kittle out there on 4th down than Moody, or Wish. Plus territory punts should be abolished imo. Punts are voluntary turnovers.
Agree he's too conservative at times, especially in 4th and short situations across the 50.
Let's see if that changes with a QB he trusts and potentially a substandard kicking game. I can't necessarily blame him for not taking chances with Jim back there.
With Jimmy, we gone over all the missed plays.
Kyle trusts all his QBs, but do the QBs trust themselves ?
NYAHAHAHAHAH..... Kyle trusts all his QBs?
He gave up the farm for Lance and gave up on Lance after 4 games ??
When i say trust, i meant calling plays to see if the QB can execute (hence, the missed plays comment)
If the QB doesn't execute, thats more on the QB not trusting themselves.
so WHY do you think Aaron often changes McCarthy's play calling?
.. and not sure how long you've been a 49er fan, but if you have been there around the 80s, I'd like to know if you'd blame Joe Montana on the 87 Vikings upset..
What does Aaron, McCarthy, Montana in 87 has to do with Kyle now ?
This is about Trust and the QBs trusting themselves. We don't have time to wait on a QB that needs more than 3 yrs to throw the ball to open players
if that's the case, they why didn't he trade for Brady or Stafford... wasn't it a better decision to give up the same farm on somone named Brady or Stafford?
.. I mean since he wanted to win asap?
But we didn't give up the farm, taking on those guys would have been bad moves also and probably leave us in a worse position today
Uve gots to be joking.. . RIGHT??
Brady would have cost us what?
Stafford's cost would have been as bad as Trey's, but we woulda won the Super Bowl w/him, or with Tom even.
the way I see it, Shanny did not want those QBs because both would have bigger than him and the QBs would have also gotten the credit instead of him..
there is no valid reason as to why he gave up what he gave up for Trey but did not want to give that up for Stafford..
i'm joking, you pretending all these guarantees would have happened. stay in the real world bud. lets take a look
Brady, He was looking real bad coming off that 2019 season. Aren't you blaming Kyle for letting Lance go, but you would be ok letting Jimmy go off a Superbowl run. You don't make sense with that logic. Also how can you fit Jimmy's Guaranteed dead cap 30 mill and sign Brady for 30 mil ? no way would any sane person do that combo
Stafford, Why don't you remember Stafford had his limitations also. While Mcvay got lucky, not one person was thinking Stafford is a Superbowl winning QB. How are the rams and stafford doing now ?
Kyle not wanting the QB to get credit is craziest thing to even think of lol, QB has been the face of every franchise good or bad