Originally posted by JoseCortez:
I expect the exponentially more talented team to have dominated this game. Yet coaching keeps these games close when they dont need to be. The only reason we won this game
1. Turnovers
2. Kyle making the right call to for it before the half (yes I give him credit)
3. Niners are more talented.
I'm sticking with this. Mcvay had his team way more ready to play than shanahan.
Purdy missed a couple big shots. I don't recall the game situation on those throws, but IIRC, they were on drives where we had to punt or kick field goals. They were the right calls and Purdy just missed them. Perhaps if he hit them, the offense puts up 33-40 points, rather than the 30 we did. All in all, I don't really have any complaints with the offense, besides the sloppy 4 minute offense at the end of the game. Mind you, 30 points is already a very high number. As a point of reference, the league leader in points scored last year was the Chiefs at 29 ppg.
I will say that it was disappointing how easy the Rams were able to march down the field in the first half, but that's how they've chosen to attack us since the NFCCG two seasons ago. A short passing game is the only thing that will work for them because we're so good at taking away the deep ball, and negates our pass rush. And Matthew Stafford is a very good QB in the NFL. But long 10+ drives are also very hard to sustain over the course of the game. They weren't able to keep it up in the second half. Penalties, drops, and some second half adjustments essentially took the wind out of their sails.
I do have a question on why we played so much off-coverage, but that's something for our film guys to answer.
All in all, being up by 10 with less than 3 minutes to play isn't so bad against a potential playoff team. Once we got to that point in the game, the dink and dunk offense loses its efficacy because it takes too much time off the clock. The 3 points in the end were pretty meaningless.