Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Sorry, but no matter what you try to say to me it's as simple as giving Mahomes the last word in a championship game is as dumb as it gets, but I will explain my opinions along side yours in order.
1 & 2.
The players must play, but it doesn't hurt to understand game situations either. That shows a lack of communication between coaching staff and player. I didn't know this was the military with need to know pay grades etc.... It's the ultimate team sport. Just look at Juice's reaction on field when he found out Mahomes gets the ball no matter what. He was in disbelief.... Why did KC go over it and we did not?
2. KC players were dumbfounded we wanted the ball first. We know Reid would have deferred if they won the toss because he already decided he would knowing they need ether a field goal or a TD to match us and if it was a TD he was going to go for 2 and never give us a 3rd series knowing how tired the defenders were..... I am not saying thats not without its own gambles, but he has Mahomes and imo he had that planned out right. His best players, giving his team their best shot to win it.
3. Millions of what if's in life. Cant play scared. But if that's how Kyle thinks then the fire Kyle crowd may have a point.
4. I disagree here and this ties back into 1 and 2....They did play different because we not only gave Mahomes the ball last. We gave him 4 downs to do it which is massive imo given the situation. If the it was the other way around....Burford's horrific mistake would still have meant we had another down.
His best players were on defense...
As for your other points I saw all that. You still can't explain to me what it changes? Ok Juice was in disbelief...did this cause him to play worse? I personally would've kicked the ball off. I said to my wife at the time it makes sense to know what you have to match or exceed and have 4 downs to it. But in the end it didn't matter, it came down to us having to score a TD - we marched it all the way down there and had a play call that would've been a TD had Burford done what he was COACHED to do. He didn't. We settle for a FG(right decision)
Then the ask is for the defense that's filled with great players even if unfortunately missing Greenlaw to do what they've done pretty much all game long except after a fumbled punt - keep the KC offense out of the endzone.
They did not. The end. It's not a great look for Kyle that the players didn't know about the new rules but it changed nothing. They had a job to do and failed to do it. End of story. Anything that KC wanted to do or said means nothing after. What happens if we scored the TD on the opening drive and then Wilks has Bosa key on Mahomes vs the RB? Would we be arguing about how Kyle almost screwed up the SB by taking the ball first?
And it's not playing scared. It's playing based on what you're seeing on the field. People want to go for it on 4th down - until you don't get it. Once again check Dan Campbell. It's football. You get points and you stop the other team from getting theirs.
And for your last point once again...it changed nothing. We had a 4th down after the Burford mistake and smartly took the points. Assuming in your scenario KC scores a TD on the opening drive(first of all you're making an assumption they wouldn't keep going for it on 4th down regardless) what gives you the belief that we'd get a TD on the next play if we had a TD play called and couldn't get a proper block as designed?
It still came down to execution on both sides of the ball. We didn't execute. Had we done so it makes no difference on who got the ball first.