Originally posted by krizay:
I have no clue why there is anything to debate.
IMO Kyle played it perfectly Why do I say that?
Because up 3 with 5 plus minutes left. 4th and goal from the 5. We forced a FG. If Reid and Mahomes was so ballsy, why did they kick a FG to tie it up. Why not go for TD to force us to scored a TD? because FG was the smart play.
Down 3 with 6 seconds left on 2nd and 10. If Reid and Mahomes was so ballsy why did they kick a FG to tie it up and force OT? because FG was the smart play.
So taking the ball 1st knowing you just held them to tie it up twice is the smart play. Especially knowing it's sudden death starting the 3rd possession.
For those arguing the Chiefs would have went for 2 for the win. Why didn't they gamble like that on their last 2 possessions?
KC confirmed their OT plan
from online: According to Mahomes, if San Francisco opened overtime with a touchdown and then Kansas City scored one of its own, the Chiefs planned to go for two to try to win the game right then and there. "I don't know if Coach Reid wants me telling everybody, but we would've went for two for sure," he said on SportsCenter.Feb 12, 2024
It's pretty stunning how well KC had this pre planned and also all their players coached up on the planning, (which we clearly did not bother to do, per our own guys). Even if you feel receive is the right call, (I don't but I can say ok fair enough if you feel that way) I think anyone has to agree KC did way better getting their guys planned and bought in on the plan many times in advance. As I understand, the new OT rules have been going on for years of playoffs. We weren't prepped for any of them. Could have bit us in the rear at any time, and happened to do so in the SB.