Originally posted by MucketyMuck:
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by Bringbackedjr:
Originally posted by eastie:
Originally posted by bassmanr:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
He needs to revamp his drop back passing scheme. All the talk of him taking Jimmy to a SB, but the truth is he was never able to make Jimmy look good in the playoffs. Our roster was just good enough to win in spite of him. I really think he needs to get better in the drop back passing game if we're going to win a ring. His passing offense gets called out by guys like Kurt Warner
Hence Kyle picked up Pearsol and Cowing and drafted Puni and Kinston. Kyle's not so stupid that he can't see his faults. He's a bit stubborn but his super bowl losses has always made him change his fundamental philosophies for the better.
1987 the 49ers were one and done and looked like they were a fading team, but then whalla, the next two years - they get it done and were on the verge of a three-pete. You just don't know. Specially with a franchise level QB like Brock, I don't think there's any real good reason to be pessimistic about the 49ers future or Kyle's coaching. But there's nothing wrong with being pessimistic. Whatever floats a 49er fans boat, so long as they are 49er fans. 
Yeah the good ol fizzle in the drizzle against the Vikings when the niners had the number 1 defense and number 1 offense.
Kyle needs to make adjustments to finally win one and then we can have Kyle as a great niners coach. He is better than most coaches and if he learns that coaches like spags catch on to what the offense is doing. He needs to counter with adjusting the offense to the new holes in zone D.
When are these 'anti-kyle' guys going to start focusing on the defense? It was the defense that couldn't hold the lead the offense gave them, but these guys skip right over that fact so that they could continue to blame KS for not winning the SB. It's laughable, with their "It's a fact dude" comments. "He's 0 for 3 bro!" LOL.
You have to be kidding. As the head coach he is responsible for both sides. We have expended more resources on the the defensive side— the d line to be exact than any other group. They played great in the sb then ran out of gas at the end or kc coached around the. Result is the same. 0-3. If it makes you feel better we can say Kyle is 0-2.5.
I like how you avoid calling the DC out for giving up the lead, but blame the OC in ATL and SF losses. I wonder why that is? I bet if Kyle was the DC then you would be hounding him for not holding onto the lead the OC gave him.
The DC held Mahomes to 2 FG's for a majority of the game. The DC gift wrapped the offense the ball in enemy territory to start the half. Now he didn't perform when he hould have and I'm glad that he's gone but the DC failed, the offense failed, special teams failed. That is a direct reflection of the HC. Right?!
49ers offense was playing the #2 defense in the NFL and that defense was arguably playing it's best football in the playoffs.
49ers defense was playing the #15 offense in the NFL.
Both the offense and the defense lost key players during the game but when it came down to it the coaching was better on offense by a long shot. When called upon despite all the BS Kyle drew up a play that should've had BA catch an easy 1st down to milk the clock after the 2 minute warning and kick the game winning FG. When it came down to it Kyle drew up a play that had 2 guys wide open for should be TDs.
Kyle doesn't control Burford going against what he's coached to do and going with his gut and not blocking Chris Jones who forced Purdy to throw the ball away. Kyle doesn't control Brock not being able to identify the blitzing defender in time to hit Aiyuk.
Wilks dropping the back end of the defense giving Mahomes an easy pickup on 2nd and long to give them a much easier 3rd and mid situation vs attacking and pushing them back doesn't help a defense made to attack.
Wilks dropping both safeties 15 yards away the LOS on a 4th and 1 play certainly didn't help the odds of stopping that play.
There are coaching decisions that make players jobs harder and there are coaching decisions which make players jobs easier. Kyle made things easier. Wilks made it harder.
But sure blame it all on the HC. I understand the logic but it's incredibly stupid. You can look at every coach in the league and pick holes in them when they lose. Any mistakes are ignored if they win.
