Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Sounding like the free jimmy crowd now
Difference is Brock consistent play and aptitude lend itself to the idea he could handle it. Jimmy didn't show that level of consistency or mental aptitude ever.
There are 203 users in the forums
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Sounding like the free jimmy crowd now
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:Brock is still 1.5 seasons in his career. thinking he can do what Brady and Manning did on their down side of their careers. Let's calm down on the coach is already holding him back talk lol
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Sounding like the free jimmy crowd now
Difference is Brock consistent play and aptitude lend itself to the idea he could handle it. Jimmy didn't show that level of consistency or mental aptitude ever.
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Sounding like the free jimmy crowd now
Difference is Brock consistent play and aptitude lend itself to the idea he could handle it. Jimmy didn't show that level of consistency or mental aptitude ever.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No adjustment can be called to cover a bad/missed/fluke play.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Brock is still 1.5 seasons in his career. thinking he can do what Brady and Manning did on their down side of their careers. Let's calm down on the coach is already holding him back talk lol
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No adjustment can be called to cover a bad/missed/fluke play.
Sure but the guy calling the protections dictates where they're protecting and who's picking up the blitzes. It wasn't just one f**k up from a backup RG in the SB.
Hey, if don't think the QB should have control of the LOS, that's fine. I think the guy who's gonna be making $200M should have a little more control. It's not blaming so and so…it's allowing the most important player getting things where the need to be. All the great QBs had that.
Originally posted by NYniner85:who said he shouldn't have control? I'm saying it's a little premature to act like Brock is Brady/Brees/Manning right now to demand more control
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No adjustment can be called to cover a bad/missed/fluke play.
Sure but the guy calling the protections dictates where they're protecting and who's picking up the blitzes. It wasn't just one f**k up from a backup RG in the SB.
Hey, if don't think the QB should have control of the LOS, that's fine. I think the guy who's gonna be making $200M should have a little more control. It's not blaming so and so…it's allowing the most important player getting things where the need to be. All the great QBs had that.
Originally posted by NYniner85:Brady and Brees didn't have full control at 1.5 seasons in now c'mon
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Brock is still 1.5 seasons in his career. thinking he can do what Brady and Manning did on their down side of their careers. Let's calm down on the coach is already holding him back talk lol
manning was controlling the LOS forever, not just in his downside of his career. Same with Brees and Brady.
all folks are saying is hey maybe it makes more sense for the QB that can see the whole field vs the center to call the protections. You're acting like it's some slap in the face to Kyle. It's not….s**t needs to evolve though.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NYniner85:Brady and Brees didn't have full control at 1.5 seasons in now c'mon
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Brock is still 1.5 seasons in his career. thinking he can do what Brady and Manning did on their down side of their careers. Let's calm down on the coach is already holding him back talk lol
manning was controlling the LOS forever, not just in his downside of his career. Same with Brees and Brady.
all folks are saying is hey maybe it makes more sense for the QB that can see the whole field vs the center to call the protections. You're acting like it's some slap in the face to Kyle. It's not….s**t needs to evolve though.
It's a slap in the face of any knowledgeable football fan that thinking all QBs can do it. The fact is, is not all QB can, especially at 1.5 seasons in.
Let Brock develop, we don't need to rush it
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NYniner85:Brady and Brees didn't have full control at 1.5 seasons in now c'mon
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Brock is still 1.5 seasons in his career. thinking he can do what Brady and Manning did on their down side of their careers. Let's calm down on the coach is already holding him back talk lol
manning was controlling the LOS forever, not just in his downside of his career. Same with Brees and Brady.
all folks are saying is hey maybe it makes more sense for the QB that can see the whole field vs the center to call the protections. You're acting like it's some slap in the face to Kyle. It's not….s**t needs to evolve though.
It's a slap in the face of any knowledgeable football fan that thinking all QBs can do it. The fact is, is not all QB can, especially at 1.5 seasons in.
Let Brock develop, we don't need to rush it
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No adjustment can be called to cover a bad/missed/fluke play.
Sure but the guy calling the protections dictates where they're protecting and who's picking up the blitzes. It wasn't just one f**k up from a backup RG in the SB.
Hey, if don't think the QB should have control of the LOS, that's fine. I think the guy who's gonna be making $200M should have a little more control. It's not blaming so and so…it's allowing the most important player getting things where the need to be. All the great QBs had that.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
too much ifs and buts, i'm not gonna pretend Reid made moves he didn't and knock him for it.
How is it not a repeat of 19?
that's my 2 prong Kyle had a bad SB thesis, the O struggled and he had years to come up with something vs Spags, he didn't come up with anything other than a good trick play. and 2nd prong, Andy had his guys ready for OT and Kyle didn't. I can much easier say okay SB 54 was a learning experience. SB 51 being in a SB OT should have been a learning experience also. SB 58 having faced KC before, having already been in the only SB OT, he should have been more ready for both.
Originally posted by Sickaa:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
The new KC D was a lot more talented than the previous. Much harder to do well against. Had we had Brock the first time around it's a 30 point game.
I wanna see Kyle with Brock against them consistently vs what he could do with average qb play vs them.
I find the KC D argument flat. Sure they are improved, yet is our O not improved? we didn't have Trent, BA, CMC, Brock in 19. Those are not bad players. It's a wash more or less..
Very much so.
Purdy, Aiyuk and CMC we're BIG upgrades over what we had previously.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NYniner85:who said he shouldn't have control? I'm saying it's a little premature to act like Brock is Brady/Brees/Manning right now to demand more control
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
No adjustment can be called to cover a bad/missed/fluke play.
Sure but the guy calling the protections dictates where they're protecting and who's picking up the blitzes. It wasn't just one f**k up from a backup RG in the SB.
Hey, if don't think the QB should have control of the LOS, that's fine. I think the guy who's gonna be making $200M should have a little more control. It's not blaming so and so…it's allowing the most important player getting things where the need to be. All the great QBs had that.