Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Thats what I've been arguing for years. They simply don't value o line.
Do I think Pearsall is the difference maker? probably not, but seeing how they handle contracts I get why they took him. My biggest hope is Purdy's growth tbh. He's that good imo and can mask a lot of faults. My fear tho is it won't matter and the o-line will always break our backs.
I mean, you can still invest in the OL and not have to think they overvalue at a different position. I got no problem with Pearsall. He was a top 40ish player and plays a premium position (look at these contacts coming out). Guys that can beat man coverage and get open quickly can help Brock and pass-pro.
They tried to get a legit center in Richburg. He'd probably still be our starter if not for that injury. Also I believe he was brought in before Foerster was the OL coach. IMO he's kinda the guy that's saying we don't need to invest a ton there, which is weird as s**t. He comes off a bit arrogant, acting like he can coach up whomever.
Overall he has coached up guys to be "starters" BUT when you have stars all over the place, why not invest a little in center or OT? Instead of treading water…you got actual studs if he's developing them as well. Doesn't make sense to me and I doubt it changes as long as he's here.