Originally posted by FanInFlorida:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
What did you want Kyle to run on that 3rd down play? How much more open do you want your WR1 to be on that?
Why be so stubborn and refuse to breakdown a play that YOU "so easily" determined a bad play-call from Kyle?
your comment back that it's all excuses is exactly what someone who doesn't understand any of it would say. Pretty lame dude.
Because, like other posters have mentioned, it doesn't matter. I can provide what I consider solid reasoning and you won't understand it. We can agree to disagree and move on. I'm not going to change your mind and you won't change mine. I don't buy your reasoning just as you don't buy mine. I don't care.
Film speaks for itself. This isn't an art piece where beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Guys are either NFL open or they're not. The play is either designed to beat the defense on that snap or it isn't. It's pretty cut and dry.
I asked that question for a reason and you're new and responded. There is a reason the other guys keep ignoring it because they don't actually have any examples of what I asked for.
None of the reasoning you could add to that specific play changes the simple fact that by design and based on what KC did on that specific play there was a pretty easy throw to make for a first down and likely SB win. That throw was not made.
It's no different than the 3rd and 4 play in OT where we had 2 guys wide open and had Burford did what he was COACHED to do on the play it's a TD play. Instead the kid "went with his gut" and the Chiefs best pass rush came in unblocked at Brock forcing the throw away.
Sure you can play the hypothetical game and do the "he should've ran it or he should've called a different pass play"...perhaps. But all we can evaluate are the plays on film and in those cases the plays were there to be made by the players. They were not.