Originally posted by 5thSFG:
-
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Bringbackedjr:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Bringbackedjr:
Sorry NY, another non answer. The NFL has clear success metrics. Winning more games than you lose is one of them. Making the post season is another. Then we have winning your division and your conference. The ultimate goal is the superbowl. If you lose more than you win the layers you refer to become pointless. This is a business. So once again, what would it take for you to support change? 2 years of a losing record? 3? 4?
I mean he's won more games than he's lost. He's gone to the playoffs a bunch. Won his division. Gone to NFCC. Gone to SBs. Those are favorable metrics in the grand scheme of the NFL and what other coaches have been doing.
matt lafleur hasn't even been to a SB and that's with Aaron Rogers. Should they be talking about firing him in GB? Sean McDermott should be fired by now according to you. Tomlin hasn't done anything meaningful in 14 yrs (lost a SB). How long does he get? What because he won a SB with someone's else team two yrs into his tenure, he's good to go forever? If Kyle won a SB for SF in 2008 and nothing since then ya'll would be screaming for him to be fired 17 yrs later….And don't b******t me as say no you wouldn't.
If you actually read what I wrote you would understand where I'm coming from. It's not a black and white SB of your fired thing. That's my stance. There's layers and context to what would have to happen.
again no one can name me one legit person to replace him with that does better than what we've done overall.
Yet another non answer.
That's RIGHT @ NY.. we wont find anyone out there doing a better job CHOCKING an NFCCG and two Super Bowls while we're up at least by 10 points on all 3 games late in the 4th QTR..
NO ONE !!!
Probably won't find one that can rebuild the roster in 2 years and get to the title game 4 out of 5 years. Kyle has been the 2nd most successful coach in the league since he completed the rebuild and got a QB. I'm even counting JG who wasn't great but at least was capable when healthy.
Everyone wants another SB win but complaining about the coach that nearly everyone in the NFL considers a top 3 guy is silly. Sure he makes wrong decisions at times but so do the players. Kyle can call the best play every time but if the players don't perform it doesn't work.
HOW we going to find out if we won't find anyone IF we don't replace KYLE?
Brady won w/o Bill so he at least proved that he can win w/o him.. Bill has yet to prove that he can win w/o Brady... so, we have the team now, we have a pretty good QB, a defense that needs some coaching..
WHY NOT BILL ??
Hilarious post… didn't see the plot twist coming.
Nodding my head in agreement as you make the case for Tom being the goat and bill riding his coat tails.
then recommend…. Bill?? Who saw that coming???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣.
TOM will forever be the 2nd best QB in the history of the NFL only behind 16.. lets just get that straight...
.. and since NY wont give anyone in the whole wide word the chance to prove that there are other coaches better than KYLE, I had to use BILL's name, someone he's familiar with and someone with a resume that's worth looking at.
again, if it was up to me, the two candidates I want is...
Dan Lanning and PJ Fleck
but again, all the Shananigans here only believe that KYLE is the only one who can COACH here..
the way I see it, he 0-2 !! he 0-2 !!!