Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Kyle did it by getting lucky on late rounders. Things like missing out on Everett and having to settle for Kittle. Harbaugh does it with coaching and he's done it at multiple stops. He's proven more, just what it is
I do prefer Harbaugh to Kyle, but that doesn't mean Kyle bad. I point out Kyles flaws because they are our current problem, but Harbaugh has his too. I just think Harbaughs a better leader. I prefer the way he pumps up players to the media, instead of downplaying them to make himself look better. I prefer his berating of the refs over Kyles Aaron Rodgers douchebag type reactions to players messing up. Kyle is a great offensive mind (him and Reid are 1a 1b) and I've never taken that from him, but he's lacking in every other department as a hc
And being given 2 top 5 recruiting classes before you even show up doesn't matter? Michigan isn't some s**tty football program. They will always have elite talent rolling in there. College football and the NFL are completely different animals with that.
Jim has had more coaching gigs. That's doesn't really prove anything imo. He lost 6 straight bowl games lost a SB and a NFCC.
Jim walked into the 49er gig with a f**k ton of seasoned vets. Go look at his draft classes if we're gonna complain out Kyle's. Kyle rebuilt the whole damn team. Who cares what round players were drafted? As long as they turned out good, that's all that matters. THAT is coaching and developing imo.
Andy Reid "missed" on Paxton Lynch who he really wanted, which lead to Mahomes. Who cares
Harbs is a motivator and hires good coaches. Jim calls out the media all the time, he's got a jackass persona and has since his playing days. He's as arrogant as anyone you will know in football. Acting like he's just some happy go lucky guy is ridiculous lol.
Go listen to Joe Staley tell you who his favorite HC was. Kyle over Jim.
Look my whole point with Jim vs Kyle is the fact that people label Kyle a choker and talk making lost NFCC and SBs…
Jim did the same exact thing here and they defended him and still are…It's hypocritical and shows a blatant bias.
So either agree that Jim was a choker or say Kyle isn't. There is no in-between because I was told we can't have context about W/Ls with HCs "those are excuses" it's ALL falls on the HC…unless Kyle wins than it's not because of him
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Oct 18, 2024 at 7:30 AM ]