Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by Kolohe:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by bmvanthiel:
Very much so. During the game I was thinking Shanahan was calling a good game with a number of nice plays. I thought the offense looked good yesterday considering all the pieces we were missing as well.
What plays were different? I thought the play calling vs DET was very good all the same.
With a make shift O-line, it showed Shanahan's play calling was elite last week. The Vikings with a healthy offense couldn't do s**t vs Detroit last night.
I think the issue is consistency and 4th quarter, second half, clutch moments etc. Kyle will tear ass for like 4 games then they all seem to lay an egg.
Yah but you can't really blame the 4th quarter blunder on Shanahan last week when his kicker missed what three FG's. He's shown that he and Brock and the offense can be consistent when they're mostly healthy.
I know. I critique him but try to always remain open minded. I think he is good, but has his faults.
No doubt, like only utilizing one RB in the game for majority of the snaps. Abandoning the run too early in the game. Not benching bad players when it's needed, for instance Jake Brendel, but I think it has more to do with Foerster than Shanahan. Just a few things, I had problems with, but I'm gonna have another problem with him if he doesn't get rid of Sorensen.