Originally posted by RonnieLott:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
And still, we are 30 years in the wilderness when it comes to our last Superbowl win.
It's hard to be irrelevant for 30 years.
Who would have thought when we beat the San Deigo Chargers, that 30 years later, the fans would still be thirsty for No 6.
Thirst like a Vampire at a Blood Bank.
If we were irrelevant for 30 years, the franchise wouldn't be worth 6 Billion today. So I don't think we're irrelevant, actually the opposite. We haven't won a chip in 30 years I agree and sadly hate.
Does that mean the Dallas Cowboys are more relevant than us. Cause they are worth 11 billion, 3 billion more than anyone else.
And more relevant than the New England Patriots and Kansas City..
Noooo Money is irrelevant.
It is a Socialist league with a draft and free trading.
So the $ value of each franchise is not relevant.
The Rings, the Thing!
Yes the Cowboys are relevant, if they weren't people wouldn't still be buying their merchandise. The rings are different issue, 49ers are relevant and your bolded post is wrong.
If you want to go the Rings route what is relevant to Super Bowl rings, teams that want to win it correct? What teams just past 5 years have been close to winning it? Are they 49ers one of those? Doesn't that make them relevant to Rings then? If you want to bring up total rings we have 5 so we're relevant there too.
[ Edited by DRCHOWDER on Jan 15, 2025 at 5:21 PM ]