There are 398 users in the forums

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

49ers Head Coach Kyle Shanahan Thread

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
He can be outrageous, but has a point and I will admit that I agree in that statistically speaking, Kyle missed his shot here. Of course I want to be wrong, but what are the odds they reload the roster properly, coach them properly, stay healthy, get it all tied together with some luck, and win a super bowl... after coming up short on that two times already. Exactly. very very slim. Most don't even get two chances. Again, if we win it all next year ill be like a pig in mud, but the rational part of my brain knows how hard it is to win it all.

But that would also apply to a new coach. Far more likely we won't even be where we are now with a new guy then being better than Kyle.

Oh I know. (reminder I've never asked for Kyle to be fired!) but the odds aren't in our favor regardless.
i think you missed the point by 94E..

The odd are worse with a new coach
  • Koldo
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 4,842
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
The book could be:-

First half - Fail

Middle - the Eddie D days - 5 Superbowls

End - the York years Fail

That doesn't respect that Eddie D was 5-17 for 1977-1998 when he controlled the team. That record says loser plain as day - 17 seasons out of 22 without a championship!

Not a single person ever associated with the NFL has won more than they lost when you talk about all or nothing this way. Lombardi, Halas, Brown, Belichick, Parcells, Walsh, Kraft, Rooney, Noll - They're losers, every one of them!

Or maybe we also value other qualities/achievements in non-championship seasons too, even if its not *the* top quality/achievement.

lol Divisional and NFCC game appearances are not achievements ! Losing Super Bowls is not an achievement. Stop spinning it as such. Everyone remembers our 5 SB wins. No one cares (outside of you and your ilk) about the "journeys" we embarked on en route to 3 Super Bowl losses. No one (outside of you and your ilk) celebrates Kyle Shanahan's "glorious" failures in the most important games.

do some of us a favor and stop trying to dilute our glory years with the failures of the last half decade. Eddie D's 5 Super Bowl wins, becoming the first team to win 5 rings, is nothing in comparison to Kyle Shanahan's 2 SB and 2 NFCC game losses. And you can't use dumb stats like "EddieD was 5 for 17 during the Super Bowl years" to defend Kyle's incompetence.

😂

Shannafans pushing the boundaries of embarrassment.

Originally posted by Koldo:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
The book could be:-

First half - Fail

Middle - the Eddie D days - 5 Superbowls

End - the York years Fail

That doesn't respect that Eddie D was 5-17 for 1977-1998 when he controlled the team. That record says loser plain as day - 17 seasons out of 22 without a championship!

Not a single person ever associated with the NFL has won more than they lost when you talk about all or nothing this way. Lombardi, Halas, Brown, Belichick, Parcells, Walsh, Kraft, Rooney, Noll - They're losers, every one of them!

Or maybe we also value other qualities/achievements in non-championship seasons too, even if its not *the* top quality/achievement.

lol Divisional and NFCC game appearances are not achievements ! Losing Super Bowls is not an achievement. Stop spinning it as such. Everyone remembers our 5 SB wins. No one cares (outside of you and your ilk) about the "journeys" we embarked on en route to 3 Super Bowl losses. No one (outside of you and your ilk) celebrates Kyle Shanahan's "glorious" failures in the most important games.

do some of us a favor and stop trying to dilute our glory years with the failures of the last half decade. Eddie D's 5 Super Bowl wins, becoming the first team to win 5 rings, is nothing in comparison to Kyle Shanahan's 2 SB and 2 NFCC game losses. And you can't use dumb stats like "EddieD was 5 for 17 during the Super Bowl years" to defend Kyle's incompetence.

😂

Shannafans pushing the boundaries of embarrassment.


Not as embarrassing as you two are. Imagine thinking coaches and our players aren't happy going on deep playoff runs. They aren't losers who will say that the season was a fail and they rather go 0-17 than lose a SB. Both of you talk like Madden is the closest either have you have been to playing sports.
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Not as embarrassing as you two are. Imagine thinking coaches and our players aren't happy going on deep playoff runs. They aren't losers who will say that the season was a fail and they rather go 0-17 than lose a SB. Both of you talk like Madden is the closest either have you have been to playing sports.

Still waiting to hear if Sean Payton, Kevin OConnel or Jim Harbaugh are getting fired. They had pathetic seasons
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by Koldo:
Originally posted by DrEll:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
The book could be:-

First half - Fail

Middle - the Eddie D days - 5 Superbowls

End - the York years Fail

That doesn't respect that Eddie D was 5-17 for 1977-1998 when he controlled the team. That record says loser plain as day - 17 seasons out of 22 without a championship!

Not a single person ever associated with the NFL has won more than they lost when you talk about all or nothing this way. Lombardi, Halas, Brown, Belichick, Parcells, Walsh, Kraft, Rooney, Noll - They're losers, every one of them!

Or maybe we also value other qualities/achievements in non-championship seasons too, even if its not *the* top quality/achievement.

lol Divisional and NFCC game appearances are not achievements ! Losing Super Bowls is not an achievement. Stop spinning it as such. Everyone remembers our 5 SB wins. No one cares (outside of you and your ilk) about the "journeys" we embarked on en route to 3 Super Bowl losses. No one (outside of you and your ilk) celebrates Kyle Shanahan's "glorious" failures in the most important games.

do some of us a favor and stop trying to dilute our glory years with the failures of the last half decade. Eddie D's 5 Super Bowl wins, becoming the first team to win 5 rings, is nothing in comparison to Kyle Shanahan's 2 SB and 2 NFCC game losses. And you can't use dumb stats like "EddieD was 5 for 17 during the Super Bowl years" to defend Kyle's incompetence.

😂

Shannafans pushing the boundaries of embarrassment.


Not as embarrassing as you two are. Imagine thinking coaches and our players aren't happy going on deep playoff runs. They aren't losers who will say that the season was a fail and they rather go 0-17 than lose a SB. Both of you talk like Madden is the closest either have you have been to playing sports.

You either win the Superbowl or your season isn't complete.

It's that simple.
Originally posted by Cisco0623:
Oh I know. (reminder I've never asked for Kyle to be fired!) but the odds aren't in our favor regardless.

They never are, for any team.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Not as embarrassing as you two are. Imagine thinking coaches and our players aren't happy going on deep playoff runs. They aren't losers who will say that the season was a fail and they rather go 0-17 than lose a SB. Both of you talk like Madden is the closest either have you have been to playing sports.

Still waiting to hear if Sean Payton, Kevin OConnel or Jim Harbaugh are getting fired. They had pathetic seasons

All their teams are currently trending up.

The San Francisco 49ers are trending down.

Do you get it now.
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
All their teams are currently trending up.

The San Francisco 49ers are trending down.

Do you get it now.


Originally posted by RonnieLott:
You either win the Superbowl or your season isn't complete.

It's that simple.

No
RonnieBott gonna RonnieBott
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
You either win the Superbowl or your season isn't complete.

It's that simple.

that's a very good point. i think our roster and kyle agrees.
Originally posted by RonnieLott:
All their teams are currently trending up.

The San Francisco 49ers are trending down.

Do you get it now.

So if 9ers win 10 games they'll be trending up again.
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
RonnieBott gonna RonnieBott

I think there is something to this. Cause the posters with some of the worst takes on this site seem to post the most but it's always the same s**t. Is it possible the web lords have AI bots posting s**t takes to increase engagement for that ad revenue….
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
RonnieBott gonna RonnieBott

I think there is something to this. Cause the posters with some of the worst takes on this site seem to post the most but it's always the same s**t. Is it possible the web lords have AI bots posting s**t takes to increase engagement for that ad revenue….

I am a real person, and my views are real and accurate.

You either win the Superbowl or not.

If you perform worse one year to another, there is higher pressure on you as a coach and an administration by your fans to turn around the trend and to get better.

These are very simple points, that somehow, some people, can't get their head around.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
RonnieBott gonna RonnieBott

I think there is something to this. Cause the posters with some of the worst takes on this site seem to post the most but it's always the same s**t. Is it possible the web lords have AI bots posting s**t takes to increase engagement for that ad revenue….

what about a bot that says 'i love my coach' after Ls to see how the board deals with that
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
what about a bot that says 'i love my coach' after Ls to see how the board deals with that

David Lombardi on line 1.
Search Share 49ersWebzone