Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by Ensatsu:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
They both reached the SB and both lost. Harbaugh had the better defense so I give the edge to Shanahan for the offense.
Being a head coach and being a coordinator are two different jobs. Everyone knows that.
Mike Nolan, Dennis Allen, Josh McDaniels, etc.
He's a good coordinator, no doubt. Now he needs to prove that he can build a team and win games. And more than likely its going to start off rough because you don't have a great QB like Matt Ryan or a great WR like Julio.
I hope to see improvement in year 3.
I don't expect this at all. He brought in guys that had a taste of his offensive system and what he likes to do on offense before, so there's less cold water. The offense will certainly not up to par with the like of Atlanta, but I think it's going to be decent, in that there will be less stupid mistakes during the game. Will they struggle to score TD? Yeah most likely.
I don't think it will be as bad as the last 2 years. Especially the Kelly year. He didn't have much in the way of experience personnel to help support his system.
I completely agree with this. This is a system and I think to a degree it will be player agnostic unless that player has elite talent. Like any WCO system, if the timing is there, the routes are run precisely and the OL run-blocks and pass-blocks well, the offense will be okay. Will it lead the NFL? Probably not, but it certainly won't be a drag on the team. Remember this offense uses the run to set up the pass so demand that the OL run-block well or this offense will struggle.
Where wins and losses come in is at defense.
Will we be able to stop anyone is the huge question - and it all comes down, for me at least, to the defensive line and their play. Can we stop the run? Can we rush the passer? Do we have a scheme that frees up Bowman to run free and make plays and not have the carry the entire front 7 on his back? Or will he just need to make a couple of key stops here and there? Will we draft a young LB who can compliment Bowman like he once complimented Willis? Secondary play will 100% depend on our ability to rush the passer. No pressure, we'll get carved up regardless of who's back there, vet or rook.
Agree with both of you all, and GM especially on the DL issue. Since 6 weeks ago we had no LBs, one would have to say we have improved. Leaning or depending on Bow is a dicey proposition, in that two major surgeries , back to back yrs....mmmm.....i just feel bad for the guy. For sure, he won't have the burst of speed he once did. Age plays a part too. Now the DL: I am assuming we get AA, DeFo, back healthy. With no NT pretty hard to run an occasional 3-4, which Mitchell takes care of. So i guess we are looking at AA, Mitchell, DeFo, Blair, Dorsey? DL, unquestionably, even tho we have picked last two times as #1 pick, has to be in the running for doing it again. And that isn't a losers deal, because we would have to settle for Solomon, great program, great coach, terrific talent. And for us he is a lock at #2.
Which brings up the option. Once Cleve shares with us their NEXT GREAT MOVE, assuming it is Watson or Myles, could easily turn right around and want our 2nd pick. That is they want the other of the two mentioned, but one still remains. Helluva fan move, in that their fans would be going bug F**K. And , i believe it could happen. Also, once they have taken their first pick to the podium, we should be in no hurry to get ours up there. Bills, Jets, both are in QB market. I'd say bears but they got nothing , or not much in trade,..one early rd 2 plus their 3rd pick in rd 3. We could do ourselves good with them too, i guess. But if we swap that #2 pick, it would have to be for their #1, plus ..,.and that is where it gets interesting. Depending on who does the picking, we should have a one best deal for our lock #2 pick Solomon.
Options include somebody who has to have that remaining QB ,whether Watson or Trubs. Somebody gets him, somebody doesen't. So that immediately puts adde pressure on interested teams to cough up the best trade deal. If someone goes crazy, ultimate is the Wentz-like six pack (2 ones, 2 twos, 2 threes). That seems unlikely
Swapping ones, getting an early rd 2 , or perhaps 2 extra in rd two, would seem like the next best bet. But if we do that, we have to be able to still draft one of Solomon, Williams, Foster, maybe Allen(altho here health bothers me, shoulders), and potentially one more sure fire starter, but really IMPACT player. My choice would be Williams...and then the additional 1 or more picks in rd 2. Best thing for us is a bidding war and some fool ending up giving us the Wentz 6 pack deal. It all depends on Cleve and exactly what they do. They have screwed up the qB pick 3 times in a row, incl last yr trading riights to Wentz for the "six pack "noted above. Could they turn around and to get Watson and Myles offer us a six pack pick? it would sure be interesting. I have vacillated back and forth on this but agree that should Cleve make this mistake, (or even take Trubs and Watson...hey it's Cleve), then we have to take it. Certainly if myles is gone, but if he still is there, 2 firsts, 2 seconds, and 2 thirds would have to trump any other consideration. That should be at least 5 or 6 starters, and is myles really that good? But that kind of thing happens only when two teams square off like Eagles and Rams. One did ok, one didn't ...at least not til now.
This plans to be our most interesting pick in ages, and whereas if there were no ohter side issues we take Solomon. Trading down we just have to make sure we get at least one of the 5 or 6 top tier players, ones most likely to be impact guys. Do that and whatever else falls into trader Kyle's and trader John's lap...say a minimum of 2 rd twos or two ones and two twos...i suspect that is our route. Keep at least one impact guy, and add on extra rd 2s , but try for an extra rd one also. Based on bears, jets, bills, have to have Qbs, cleve too, by our pick , things ought to be tight heinie for the above teams. As long as we take our time, no telling what falls out of the woodwork. But my bet is someone loses his "schidt" and does something really nutty. That could be 15 minutes of sheer bliss for us. And if no takers, we are "stuck" with Solomon. That is one heckuva booby prize.
It will make our DL a bit interesting, however. But Saleh, kyle and lynch can figure out how to piece that DL together so that Solomon, DeFo, AA, Mitchell, and Blair all get to play...a lot. Our biggest hole is at LB and with a bunch of picks thrown in for moving down, we would hopefully snag a very good LB, plus get another in rd two. So we are set . It is the other guys who don't have the #2 pick that aren't.