The Iron-Pyrite-Lining Thread (Negative people come on in!)

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by thl408:
I actually like the idea of this thread (minus the Trubisky love in the OP) because I was sick of hearing, "everything is awesome" all offseason. Yin and yang type stuff is needed imo. This thread is a little too QB centric, but I get that everyone likes to talk QBs.

I got no qualms with a negative discussion or negative threads.

then there should be no qualms on negative post towards poster

Attack the posts not the poster. It's always been the case here.

True

but what case is this?? Talking s**t about the new regime when there is no proof of his opinion. How can he prove his side ? how can we prove our side. He is just rubbing his s**t in our face

2013 he came in talking s**t about us (coincidence we were good)
Years later he didn't have to talk s**t because we sucked
Now that we are having a great off season with a chance turn things around, hes back to talking s**t (s**t other teams fans do)

Dude is scared of us being good again

News Flash: 9ers Suck until proven otherwise!

NinerSickness has leg to stand on. This regime hasn't done jack s**t. He doesn't feel confident about the direction they are going in. Not everyone is going to be in love with their every move. Let him voice his opinion. Look at the thread title! Geez!

Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
News Flash: 9ers Suck until proven otherwise!

NinerSickness has leg to stand on. This regime hasn't done jack s**t. He doesn't feel confident about the direction they are going in. Not everyone is going to be in love with their every move. Let him voice his opinion. Look at the thread title! Geez!

now the thread title is misleading. I have no issues with proven facts of negativity or slight instances where negativity could be made.

There is no proof that the new regime has done jack s**t , but pretty much the opposite

dude is just a hater. probably hawks fan but sounds more raiderish

Originally posted by evil:
Attack the posts not the poster. It's always been the case here.

The OP is revolving around the poster not getting "his" guy in McDainels and Mitch....if Lynch would have drafted "his" guy then he'd love him lol.

I wanted Josh over Kyle, BUT I understand that he's a talented play-caller and the proof is in the pudding over the past 8 yrs. Lynch surrounds himself with a past GM who had success and a up in coming guy (Peters) who's got some rings and worked for two great organizations...how that's amateur is beyond me.

I'm fine with yin and yang stuff...but this is all about one poster crying about not getting who he wants....given who we looked at and what has happened this off season (and who we had prior) I don't know how you could say this has been total s**t and we have not plan?

How he could say Lynch/Shanny are amateur and don't know what they're doing then in the same breath say we needed to draft a QB with only 13 career starts sounds a bit hypocritical to me.

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

Originally posted by LeProfessionnel:

If we had a different GM what do you think we would be doing differently?

A different HC and GM would mean no Kirk.

Cousins would be an upgrade over any QB on our roster or any QB we've had in the last 15 years. He would also be a fit with pretty much any head coach that knows this is a passing league. Harbaugh would probably misuse him but McDaniels would go after Cousins if he was here. Garoppolo and Cousins would be on the top of his list.

Garoppolo is also an option for ShanaLynch if we can't land Cousins. If Cousins wants too much money or if he signs somewhere else. The Patriots may want too much for Garoppolo.

We don't even know what will happen. We could very well end up drafting a QB early next year. Out of all available head coaches we landed one of the best as far as offensive minds and having an eye for QB talent.

Anyway, when I ask you specifically what we would've done differently with a different GM your answer is something that hasn't happened and may not even happen at all.


I'll ask again, if we had a different GM what would we have done differently?

I think your answer, that you don't want to share, is we would've drafted Trubisky. Which GM/HC do you want and what do you think they would've done in the 2017 draft and free agency? How would we have a better team right now with a different GM?

Originally posted by LeProfessionnel:

Garoppolo is also an option for ShanaLynch if we can't land Cousins.

That's an option I don't think is very realistic, but I like it more than going after Cousins. It'd be just river-boat gambling, which is a better strategy than signing who I think is a guaranteed loser. Garoppolo could be the next Brees, or he could be the next Cassel, and I honestly have no idea which one is more realistic.

Originally posted by LeProfessionnel:

I'll ask again, if we had a different GM what would we have done differently?

Draft a QB higher? Trubisky? Watson?

But this is about what I expect them to do in the future, not the past.

If someone can't make a better logical case in 34 pages, maybe it's just better that all this negativity is collected in one thread that can be ignored.

Originally posted by BOI49er:
If someone can't make a better logical case in 34 pages, maybe it's just better that all this negativity is collected in one thread that can be ignored.

yup.

he has nothing. Fake negativity thread

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

How does it make sense to not be negative about a team if you don't think they have a legitimate shot at the Super Bowl? You're making zero sense.

Still trolling. Ignore my whole post, unable to refute anything, and respond with this?

There might as well only 5 teams in the league, because that's about the number of teams currently with a legitimate shot at a title next year.

Originally posted by adrianlesnar:

Originally posted by NinerSickness:
How does it make sense to not be negative about a team if you don't think they have a legitimate shot at the Super Bowl? You're making zero sense.

Still trolling. Ignore my whole post, unable to refute anything, and respond with this?

Still crying. I already addressed your objection throughout this thread; you went off on a tangent about Harbaugh (whom I supported over Baalke the entire time and who was my favourite coaching candidate available the year he was hired) and then went on a tangent about Jared Goff.

You've made your point. Wipe your tears & move on.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
The OP is revolving around the poster not getting "his" guy in McDainels

Now you're just making s**t up.

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

The OP is revolving around the poster not getting "his" guy in McDainels

Now you're just making s**t up.

Really? Who did you want as HC?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
The OP is revolving around the poster not getting "his" guy in McDainels

Now you're just making s**t up.

Really? Who did you want as HC?

I wanted Kyle Shanahan or David Shaw. In that order.

Originally posted by NinerSickness:

Still crying. I already addressed your objection throughout this thread; you went off on a tangent about Harbaugh (whom I supported over Baalke the entire time and who was my favourite coaching candidate available the year he was hired) and then went on a tangent about Jared Goff.

You've made your point. Wipe your tears & move on.

Stilllllll trolling. Hopefully, when tears ever actually do start falling, they'll be of joy because a QB, handpicked by lynch and shanny, are hoisting a lombardi trophy.

I'm having a hard time seeing how pointing out the inconsistencies of your arguments can be regarded as tangents