Originally posted by NYniner85:
Right? I mean all the GMs with multiple SBs are currently employed for a reason lol.
He might as well say his #1 get was bill belichick
Essentially, all he's been saying this entire thread is, and I'm paraphrasing of course, that it is better to gamble on an unknown then to cross our fingers for someone who, in his opinion, has proven to have absolutely 0 chance at a Superbowl. What makes him qualified to make this opinion is the question, but it is a valid point. I'd much rather draft a Trubisky then sign a Cutler. Trubs has maybe a 20% chance vs Cutler at 1%. How cousins has ever proven ANYTHING other than the potential to be a top qb tho, is lost on me, thus making his point moot.
Furthermore, he then argues against his only valid point, by saying we are directionless because we're gambling on Lynch, someone who's a complete question mark, when the only other options were, in his mind, s**tty gm's seeing as to how they've never sniffed a superbowl.
There are plenty of reasons to be concerned, to have questions, or to be unsure. But the cynicism based purely off of hyperbole and hypocrisy is unwarranted, ridiculous, and tired.