I wanted to touch on the 2 INT's as I'm sure a lot of people are wondering what went wrong.
Here's the first:
We're going to run a number of concepts here. We have a dagger+mesh+2 trail concepts. The dagger is a clearing vertical down the seam with a DIG behind it. The wheel route from the TE behind the DIG creates a trail concept. The outlet from the RB also creates a trail and mesh with the wheel and DIG routes. A lot going on here. We line Bourne up in the slot with Goodwin outside and LA has both corners over on that side, revealing man-coverage. The 2 safeties are showing either a 2 deep or "robber" defense.
We run play action first and the backside safety bites hard, other than that it's cover 2-man.
When Jimmy turns around he checks the safety and sees the 2 deep look and inside leverage on the post route. This means the DIG would be your second read. Goodwin has good initial position.
You see the backside safety has realized the error of his ways and is trying to recover. There
might be a window to throw to Bourne over the top but that's a risky throw. YOu can see how the dagger is meant to clear out the intermediate middle for the DIG though. Jimmy is in his throwing motion right now before Goodwin breaks. Normally, that's something you really want to see from your QB, anticipation. He saw Goodwin had inside leverage with no safety available to drive on the throw. This should be a win.
The corner does an excellent job of staying in the receivers hip pocket and anticipating the route. He undercuts the route really nicely.
IMO that's one where you chalk it up to a nice play by the defender. Goodwin could've ran his route flatter and coming back to the QB. That's the biggest error to me, if you look Goodwin rounds of his route from the 45-40 and Jimmy throws it as if he's going to be at the 42 or so. That would've help prevent the defender from undercutting the route. I don't fault Jimmy here.