Here's another instance where the "mable" coverage got Hoyer. It's the very next drive, inside 30 seconds and another 3rd down. This time, 3rd and 1.
Here we're going to run an outside mesh concept and then on the other side we'll run a streak up the seam with kittle and have Garcon on a slant. Taylor is going to run a curl over the middle. Some call is a "snag" route.
Sea is once again in "mable". they like to do this against 3 receiver sides. So, the 2 receiver side is in man-coverage with the outside coverage guy reading any route on that side. He'll look for a vertical releasing route. The MLB will look for any shallow crossers or hook routes and on the other side you'll have a deep 1/3 zone, outside hook zone that will carry vertical routes and out breaking mid routes and a flat zone defender. The idea is, the 3 receiver side won't be able to run 'flood' routes(to the Cohn article, he also said "flood" concepts worked against Seattle's cover 3 zone - Grant....take a lesson....[does that sound arrogant???])
At the snap you can see Seattle's "mable" really well here. You see the defenders in zone(sherm especially) with Chancellor keying Kittle to see if he'll go vertical or out. You also see Garcon manned up on the other side.
Staley's responsibility on this play is to cut down the EMLOS to make way for the slant - so it is a read on this play. You see the flat defender taking away that route and the hook/curl on the zone side taking away the middle in. It appears as if Taylor is open. He'd have to be getting the ball right away, that's tough from this close and Wagner is already driving on the route - that's what I was meaning that he's going to be looking for the crosser/middle hook route. The QB has to realize that against a "mable' defense. Wagner is going to get an "under, under under!" call from the hook/curl on the trips side and look to drive on that route. Chancellor is carrying Kittle vertical.
Now, we might disagree here. I think Staley did a poor job cutting the EMLOS, but I do believe if the ball had been thrown right before this pic the lane was there and he had Garcon on the slant. You can see he's got the separation as the ball was in the air. On the flip side, Taylor does look open, though Wagner is driving on the ball. If Taylor makes this catch, it's a non-issue, but that's a tough task against that guy for a slot receiver when Wagner is going to be looking for that route. To me, if I know I'll have Garcon 1v1 in space against their #2 guy when he's running a slant - I'm going there with the ball. No question.
The thing to me is, I think he should've been looking Garcon's way the whole time against this coverage. Just my opinion though.