Originally posted by NCommand:
They go for the free wifi.
They can just get that s**t at McDonalds or Starbucks.
There are 255 users in the forums
What is up with our empty stadium??
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:21 AM
- Ensatsu
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,359
They can just get that s**t at McDonalds or Starbucks.
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:26 AM
- SJniner7
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,749
Go look at the pictures from the whole stadium and you will see what the problem was. There was plenty of people there, the concourses were full.
If you look at the side in the shade, it was about 80% full. The side in the sun? about 10% full.
I don't know about you guys, but I would have zero desire to be drunk and sitting in direct sunlight in 90 degree temperature. That does not make for a good experience.
This is the main reason I got my tickets under the tower.
If you look at the side in the shade, it was about 80% full. The side in the sun? about 10% full.
I don't know about you guys, but I would have zero desire to be drunk and sitting in direct sunlight in 90 degree temperature. That does not make for a good experience.
This is the main reason I got my tickets under the tower.
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:40 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,742
Originally posted by Ensatsu:
Originally posted by PrimeTime:
Man I was at the game yesterday sitting in the lower section and it was hot AF but I was still chanting and yelling for no reason. These new silicon valley corporate fans are worthless. Can't even stand up and cheer without anyone looking at you weird. They just want to sit down and stare at their phones while casually watching the game quietly.
What a miserable day it was yesterday in the heat. Would have been less complaints if we were actually playing decent. Yes, some were in the shade but I've never been able to get out of traffic so fast and was literally home in downtown San Jose within 20 minutes from leaving Blue Lot 1. Empty stadium
I thought it was hilarious watching all the fans pass out on the side of the road trying to find their cars in the parking lot. Damn techies.
Why would rich techies even waste their time of day going to these games anymore? Rich techies are only going to go if there is a football product actually worth seeing. Not this trash heap.
Rich techies don't go for football but to take selfies....
All seriousness I was amazed at how many people I saw there last season focused in on their phones and not the games. Go to a place like AT&T in Dallas and you end up leaving a game there with a ringing in your ears like a concert from the screaming fans there all game long. (every time I visit my folks they take me to a game, I think to torture me)
[ Edited by jcs on Sep 11, 2017 at 9:43 AM ]
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:42 AM
- DRnSFw
- BlessUp
- Posts: 68,052
the sun is unforgiving, I never made it to my seat, I stayed in the standing room only section
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:47 AM
- TheWooLick
- Veteran
- Posts: 41,677
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:49 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,742
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
+1
Yorks have driven this storied franchise into the ground....
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:50 AM
- okdkid
- Veteran
- Posts: 23,204
I couldn't care less. We are playing bad football. It's not our job to make players feel better about themselves. Fans will return and brave the sun when this team puts an entertaining product on the field.
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:52 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,742
Originally posted by okdkid:
I couldn't care less. We are playing bad football. It's not our job to make players feel better about themselves. Fans will return and brave the sun when this team puts an entertaining product on the field.
The only fans that have braved the sun at Levis in it's history are for the visiting teams....
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM
- Ensatsu
- Veteran
- Posts: 9,359
Originally posted by jcs:
The only fans that have braved the sun at Levis in it's history are for the visiting teams....
Yeah because we make the visiting team feel like Superbowl contenders everytime they play us.
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:54 AM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 68,536
Originally posted by TheWooLick:stop making s**t up. you have been explained idk how many times on this. Why can't you just learn from that instead of ignoring it
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
SF has voted against it since the early 90s. The 94 SB was actually supposed to be played in SF in the new stadium. but got bumped to SD since we couldn't get one built. Yorks took over in 2000
Sep 11, 2017 at 9:59 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,742
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-06-05/sports/9706050108_1_stadium-proposal-president-carmen-policy-3com-park
Originally posted by TheWooLick:stop making s**t up. you have been explained idk how many times on this. Why can't you just learn from that instead of ignoring it
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
SF has voted against it since the early 90s. The 94 SB was actually supposed to be played in SF in the new stadium. but got bumped to SD since we couldn't get one built. Yorks took over in 2000
"June 05, 1997|By Mark Shapiro.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco 49ers' threats about leaving town are gone in the thrill of victory.
After pulling out a heart-stopping election-day victory in a drive for a new stadium, the team hurried to renew its vows to the city and looked ahead to building its dream home."
Of course we all know what happened in 97'
Sep 11, 2017 at 10:01 AM
- dmax
- Veteran
- Posts: 22,900
- NFL Pick 'em
I was at the game yesterday and yes that section is very hot
but u SUCK IT UP..I'm kidding
I don't get why isn't there any protection from the sun...didn't jed think about that when building the stadium
but u SUCK IT UP..I'm kidding
I don't get why isn't there any protection from the sun...didn't jed think about that when building the stadium
[ Edited by dmax on Sep 11, 2017 at 10:02 AM ]
Sep 11, 2017 at 10:04 AM
- 49AllTheTime
- Veteran
- Posts: 68,536
Originally posted by jcs:what does your post prove?
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-06-05/sports/9706050108_1_stadium-proposal-president-carmen-policy-3com-park
Originally posted by TheWooLick:stop making s**t up. you have been explained idk how many times on this. Why can't you just learn from that instead of ignoring it
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
SF has voted against it since the early 90s. The 94 SB was actually supposed to be played in SF in the new stadium. but got bumped to SD since we couldn't get one built. Yorks took over in 2000
"June 05, 1997|By Mark Shapiro.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco 49ers' threats about leaving town are gone in the thrill of victory.
After pulling out a heart-stopping election-day victory in a drive for a new stadium, the team hurried to renew its vows to the city and looked ahead to building its dream home."
Of course we all know what happened in 97'
Sep 11, 2017 at 10:05 AM
- SnakePlissken
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,028
Originally posted by jcs:http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-06-05/sports/9706050108_1_stadium-proposal-president-carmen-policy-3com-parkOriginally posted by 49AllTheTime:stop making s**t up. you have been explained idk how many times on this. Why can't you just learn from that instead of ignoring itOriginally posted by TheWooLick:Originally posted by SnakePlissken:Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
SF has voted against it since the early 90s. The 94 SB was actually supposed to be played in SF in the new stadium. but got bumped to SD since we couldn't get one built. Yorks took over in 2000
"June 05, 1997|By Mark Shapiro.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco 49ers' threats about leaving town are gone in the thrill of victory.
After pulling out a heart-stopping election-day victory in a drive for a new stadium, the team hurried to renew its vows to the city and looked ahead to building its dream home."
Of course we all know what happened in 97'
Lol you beat me to it, had the same article! 1997 was the beginning of the end for Camelot. People love hating the Yorks, but never accept why they're here to begin with.
Sep 11, 2017 at 10:07 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,742
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by jcs:what does your post prove?
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1997-06-05/sports/9706050108_1_stadium-proposal-president-carmen-policy-3com-park
Originally posted by TheWooLick:stop making s**t up. you have been explained idk how many times on this. Why can't you just learn from that instead of ignoring it
Originally posted by SnakePlissken:
Everything goes back to Eddie D f**king it all up. His stadium was gonna be badass, was gonna have a state of the art, built-in shopping mall + theater to prevent fans from leaving too soon to beat traffic.
All our failures to exceed, and prosper are unfortunately intertwined within the debauchery of our past success. Thus is life.
The Yorks could have kept the plan for a new stadium and mall alive but chose to kill it because it was too great of a capital investment in their minds. Eddie was all in and San Francisco was on board with voter approval.
It is the York's fault.
SF has voted against it since the early 90s. The 94 SB was actually supposed to be played in SF in the new stadium. but got bumped to SD since we couldn't get one built. Yorks took over in 2000
"June 05, 1997|By Mark Shapiro.
SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco 49ers' threats about leaving town are gone in the thrill of victory.
After pulling out a heart-stopping election-day victory in a drive for a new stadium, the team hurried to renew its vows to the city and looked ahead to building its dream home."
Of course we all know what happened in 97'
Stadium was approved in SF in 97' but because of a sex show birthday party and Eddie's involvement with a Louisiana Governor and Denises take over of the team we saw it go down in flames.
[ Edited by jcs on Sep 11, 2017 at 10:08 AM ]