Originally posted by birdie2bogey:
Originally posted by theduke85:
Did you guys see the "roughing" the passer call on Aaron Donald in the 3rd quarter? You can't hit a QB high, you can't hit a QB low, and I guess you can't hit him in the midsection either.
https://imgur.com/a/W7jES
The 49ers were down 27-13 at that point. Could the refs make it any more obvious that they were trying to will the 49ers back in the game? I mean, it was so blatant that they were trying to manufacture a competitive game... they weren't even trying to hide it.
I guess it was a primetime game though, Goodell had to en$ure that the game $tayed competitive $o that people would hang around to watch more adverti$ement$.
It was a bad call but hard to claim that it affected anything beyond adding yards to Garcon's incredible catch. In real time it looked like he pile drive, but in the replay it looks text book.
The OPI did have a drastic influence on the outcome though.
Of course. I'm joking. It was just meant to mock the typical confirmation bias that we see. Ignore the calls that benefit us and magnify the ones that hurt us.
Like, people having been complaining a lot about the Seattle game too. For sure, there were some bad non-calls where our defensive lineman were getting held. However, off the top of my head, there was a play where Jimmy Graham was absolutely mauled in the end zone and there was no pass interference call. That probably directly cost the Seahawks 4 points. How many times over the course of people complaining about officiating has anyone bothered to mention that play? Seriously, could you imagine what would've happened if that happened to Kittle? We'd hear the same hackneyed "OMG, SEATTLE DB'S GET AWAY WITH MURDER" and "WELL, IT
IS SEATTLE -- YOU'RE ALSO PLAYING AGAINST THE REFS THERE!" nonsense.
Ignore the stuff that benefits us, double-down on the stuff that fits the narrative. It's just petty.
[ Edited by theduke85 on Sep 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM ]