I understand that I am completely in the minority here but I have never loved Deebo.
Sure I recognize that he has had some great games and even won some for the 9ers.
I also think he is a diva, not a leader of men and will fumble or get hurt at the worst time in a game.
Also KS is addicted to the stupid bubble screen/jet sweep that doesn't work with Deebo. (anymore)
There are 80 users in the forums
Deebo Samuel-WR-South Carolina
Jan 26, 2025 at 7:27 PM
- Crown
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 35,494
Jan 27, 2025 at 9:35 AM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,921
Originally posted by Crown:
I understand that I am completely in the minority here but I have never loved Deebo.
Sure I recognize that he has had some great games and even won some for the 9ers.
I also think he is a diva, not a leader of men and will fumble or get hurt at the worst time in a game.
Also KS is addicted to the stupid bubble screen/jet sweep that doesn't work with Deebo. (anymore)
Almost all WR's in this league are Divas and not leaders. They either want a trade or a pay increase like Aiyuk this past offseason. I mean that's how A.J. Brown ended up in Philly.
Jan 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM
- WINiner
- Veteran
- Posts: 15,753
Id like to see Deebo get traded during the draft. A: He's declining, B: Maybe his absence will avoid the plays that use him behind the line of scrimmage that fail at the same rate as his decline.
Jan 27, 2025 at 11:59 AM
- tohara3
- Veteran
- Posts: 29,045
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by WINiner:
Id like to see Deebo get traded during the draft. A: He's declining, B: Maybe his absence will avoid the plays that use him behind the line of scrimmage that fail at the same rate as his decline.
This. If a team comes calling trade him please. I like Deebo too
Jan 27, 2025 at 12:16 PM
- PRIMETIME21
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,494
Yea get rid of him as we can, he ain't even a wr really, more of a middle of the pack running back who can only get open on slant routes
Jan 27, 2025 at 12:18 PM
- 49erFaithful6
- Veteran
- Posts: 37,646
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Jan 27, 2025 at 12:47 PM
- BoldRedandGold
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,711
Too big a cap hit to trade or cut. He's basically stuck or you pay to get rid of him now.
Jan 27, 2025 at 1:11 PM
- glorydayz
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,300
We need this guy in order to win. We need to build around our guys that can play while getting rid of the guys that can't play.
How much a player makes won't matter if we are winning. Right now we have a lot of inflated contracts based on this years results.
How much a player makes won't matter if we are winning. Right now we have a lot of inflated contracts based on this years results.
Jan 27, 2025 at 1:31 PM
- captveg
- Veteran
- Posts: 27,858
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Didn't we do this very thing with Buckner, trading him at his peak value for draft picks and cap space? You can't say "do that!" and then when they do have people b***h about it for the next five years.
Jan 27, 2025 at 2:04 PM
- D0PEMAN
- Veteran
- Posts: 5,067
a very expensive emergency RB 
Jan 27, 2025 at 6:28 PM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,921
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
We don't have a Mahomes that can make avg talent look great. So we keep the talent we have on offense maybe a little too long. I mean if it were Walsh we'd probably be shopping Kittle right now as he's going to be 32 next year with a large deal.
Jan 27, 2025 at 6:29 PM
- jcs
- Veteran
- Posts: 38,921
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Didn't we do this very thing with Buckner, trading him at his peak value for draft picks and cap space? You can't say "do that!" and then when they do have people b***h about it for the next five years.
No we did the dumb thing with Buckner, we traded a "Young" still developing and dominate DE/DT and got a broken down rookie in exchange while keeping a lesser of the two players Armsdead.
Jan 28, 2025 at 5:08 AM
- PRIMETIME21
- Veteran
- Posts: 17,494
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Didn't we do this very thing with Buckner, trading him at his peak value for draft picks and cap space? You can't say "do that!" and then when they do have people b***h about it for the next five years.
No we did the dumb thing with Buckner, we traded a "Young" still developing and dominate DE/DT and got a broken down rookie in exchange while keeping a lesser of the two players Armsdead.
That's up there with the Trey lance debacle
Jan 28, 2025 at 5:53 AM
- Jcool
- Veteran
- Posts: 44,153
- NFL Pick 'em
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Didn't we do this very thing with Buckner, trading him at his peak value for draft picks and cap space? You can't say "do that!" and then when they do have people b***h about it for the next five years.
No we did the dumb thing with Buckner, we traded a "Young" still developing and dominate DE/DT and got a broken down rookie in exchange while keeping a lesser of the two players Armsdead.
Isn't that exactly what KC did? Traded a "young" WR and really didn't replace him. Hill had his best seasons in the two years after he left KC. Also lets not disparage Armstead. He probably was more consistent a player then Buckner.
Jan 28, 2025 at 6:12 AM
- Cisco0623
- Veteran
- Posts: 13,285
Originally posted by Jcool:
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by captveg:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
if we look a chiefs, a bold move was trading hill when he was dominating the game. they set themselves up well in draft picks and cap space. on the flip side of that coin is us. we ride a guy til he's worthless then we look for the deal. the old buy high and sell low.
Didn't we do this very thing with Buckner, trading him at his peak value for draft picks and cap space? You can't say "do that!" and then when they do have people b***h about it for the next five years.
No we did the dumb thing with Buckner, we traded a "Young" still developing and dominate DE/DT and got a broken down rookie in exchange while keeping a lesser of the two players Armsdead.
Isn't that exactly what KC did? Traded a "young" WR and really didn't replace him. Hill had his best seasons in the two years after he left KC. Also lets not disparage Armstead. He probably was more consistent a player then Buckner.
Walsh always said better a year early than a year late