Deebo Samuel-WR-South Carolina | Page 555

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:38 AM

genus49
Veteran
Posts: 23,467

Originally posted by 8to81:
In no way am I condoning getting rid of Deebo. I can however understand the logic behind moving him instead of paying him.

2019 Missed 4 games
2020 Missed 9 games
2021 Missed 4 games

I am the one of the biggest fans of Deebo anywhere. But you can't deny the problems he has had with soft tissue injuries (hamstring specifically) and ankles. Couple that with his previous weight problems and you have to judge the possibility (albeit minimal) that he becomes complacent after getting paid.

What?

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:47 AM

#8312

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 112,559

Originally posted by 8to81:
In no way am I condoning getting rid of Deebo. I can however understand the logic behind moving him instead of paying him.

2019 Missed 4 games
2020 Missed 9 games
2021 Missed 4 games

I am the one of the biggest fans of Deebo anywhere. But you can't deny the problems he has had with soft tissue injuries (hamstring specifically) and ankles. Couple that with his previous weight problems and you have to judge the possibility (albeit minimal) that he becomes complacent after getting paid.

Where are you getting missed 4 games in 2019 and 4 games this past season? Kittle & Bosa have missed more games then he has…shouldn't pay them either, eh?

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:47 AM

#8313

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,342
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by YACBros85:
So we shouldn't have paid Kittle either?

I mean.... not sure you should be using Kittle for your argument to pay Deebo.

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:49 AM

#8314

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 112,559

Originally posted by genus49:
What?

Right? It's like people are making s**t up now. My god pay the dude and let's go.

they don't spend money on free agency (and have a pretty poor track record when they do). They focus on paying their own and have the highest paid position in the sport on a rookie contract basically thru the life of deebo's contract

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:52 AM

#8315

NYniner85
Veteran
Posts: 112,559

Originally posted by krizay:

Originally posted by YACBros85:
So we shouldn't have paid Kittle either?

I mean.... not sure you should be using Kittle for your argument to pay Deebo.

Guess we shouldn't have paid Trent Williams then, he's played in just 2 full seasons since he came into the league.

why not use Kittle? He's one of the best players at his position. Football players get hurt, facts of life.

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:54 AM

#8316

mrbusinessman499
Veteran
Posts: 4,388

Love Deebo, but based on his injure history, I would rather trade him now than pay him a huge lump sum of money. Sorry

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:55 AM

#8317

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,342
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Guess we shouldn't have paid Trent Williams then, he's played in just 2 full seasons since he came into the league.

why not use Kittle? He's one of the best players at his position. Football players get hurt, facts of life.

Kittle hasn't exactly lived up to his contract. Not all of it his fault. Doesn't change the fact he has his fair share of games where he's invisible.

Apr 18, 2022 at 9:56 AM

#8318

Strwy2Hevn
Veteran
Posts: 20,021

Originally posted by mrbusinessman499:
Love Deebo, but based on his injure history, I would rather trade him now than pay him a huge lump sum of money. Sorry

This team would be utter garbage using this logic. No Kittle, No Silverback, No Bosa.

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:01 AM

#8319

lamontb
Veteran
Posts: 31,412
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 8to81:
In no way am I condoning getting rid of Deebo. I can however understand the logic behind moving him instead of paying him.

2019 Missed 4 games
2020 Missed 9 games
2021 Missed 4 games

I am the one of the biggest fans of Deebo anywhere. But you can't deny the problems he has had with soft tissue injuries (hamstring specifically) and ankles. Couple that with his previous weight problems and you have to judge the possibility (albeit minimal) that he becomes complacent after getting paid.

So we shouldn't have paid Kittle either?

And we better not pay Bosa. He's blow out his knee twice already. i say we trade him and just draft his replacement

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:01 AM

#8320

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 70,442

no one can predict the future.. but this site is trying to

90% chance of getting injured and missing games in 2022

https://www.draftsharks.com/fantasy/injury-history/deebo-samuel/10205

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:03 AM

#8321

krizay
Veteran
Posts: 25,342
NFL Pick 'em

Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
This team would be utter garbage using this logic. No Kittle, No Silverback, No Bosa.

Bosa is a no brainer. You can't replace numbers of a dominant edge rusher by scheme. On defense you truly do need dogs.

Offensively, you can scheme production from positions.

That said, Kittle's extension wasn't that outrageous and was also a no brainer.

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:04 AM

#8322

NCommand
Hall of Fame
Posts: 123,365

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
no one can predict the future.. but this site is trying to

90% chance of getting injured and missing games in 2022

https://www.draftsharks.com/fantasy/injury-history/deebo-samuel/10205

Nice find.

But he's a 49er which means every player on this team has a 90% chance of missing games next year.

It's literally, our identity. The REAL "49ers way"

[ Edited by NCommand on Apr 18, 2022 at 10:06 AM ]

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:05 AM

#8323

JTB1974
Veteran
Posts: 14,670
NFL Pick 'em

The Jags are to blame here. Giving Kirk $18 Million. What the hell was that?

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:06 AM

#8324

Strwy2Hevn
Veteran
Posts: 20,021

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
no one can predict the future.. but this site is trying to

90% chance of getting injured and missing games in 2022

https://www.draftsharks.com/fantasy/injury-history/deebo-samuel/10205

Whats it say about Bosa?

Apr 18, 2022 at 10:06 AM

#8325

8to81
Veteran
Posts: 26

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by 8to81:
In no way am I condoning getting rid of Deebo. I can however understand the logic behind moving him instead of paying him.

2019 Missed 4 games
2020 Missed 9 games
2021 Missed 4 games

I am the one of the biggest fans of Deebo anywhere. But you can't deny the problems he has had with soft tissue injuries (hamstring specifically) and ankles. Couple that with his previous weight problems and you have to judge the possibility (albeit minimal) that he becomes complacent after getting paid.

So we shouldn't have paid Kittle either?

I'm not advocating for it but there is an argument that paying Kittle was actually a bad business move. Not one I'm making but there are legitimate arguments against it.