DE Nick Bosa "Smaller Bear" NO POLITICS

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

lol no it's not

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

lol no it's not

Look at Isaac Guerendo's face. Does he look happy?

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:

This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

lol no it's not

Look at Isaac Guerendo's face. Does he look happy?

Guarantee you he doesn't care. Just fans overreacting to something cause they need something to b***h about

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

lol no it's not

Look at Isaac Guerendo's face. Does he look happy?

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

Thats absolutely rubbish. People are allowed to have their own opinions. Just because it isn't your opinion.

You are trying to implement Communism not Democracy.

And Charles Haley actually did it through George Sieffert's sunroof, so it actually was in the car.

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

lol no it's not

Look at Isaac Guerendo's face. Does he look happy?

Guarantee you he doesn't care. Just fans overreacting to something cause they need something to b***h about

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by RonnieLott:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by redrathman:

Originally posted by Dshearn:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by joeknows:
This is what I call the sack fallacy. It's obvious that one sack is (usually) better than one pressure, but multiple pressures might be a lot better than one sack.

Pressures lead to incompletions, interceptions, twitchy QB play, shuffled OL resources, play-calling adjustments, blocked passing lanes, and a a ton of stuff that will win you games.

Pressures also work better when we have s pocket QB. Guys wit mobility however exploit us every time on key downs and I am sick of it

That's a LBer thing just as much. No one should expect Bosa to chase around Murray. Setting the edge is one thing. You need to spy those mobile guys.

pressure makes an entire defense.....

Charles Haley was nearly unblockable when he was in his groove....

I would much rather have a 10 or 11 sack Haley that was forcing QBs to get rid of the ball game after game...then a dude who got 16 sacks with half of them being cheaper pick up sacks....

Sacks are great....but we have all seen games were some dude is invisible 95% of the game...then lucks into a sack every once in a while.

Funny you should mention Haley, because his off the field behavior directly led him to being traded in his prime to the Cowboys and them winning the Super Bowl in 1992.

when he take a dump in Shanny's car....we can circle back to this....

It was on the car, not in the car.

I'd saying running up behind your Pro Bowl Quarterback on live TV acting like a clown pointing to your political hat is much worse than taking a dump on the hood of someone's car.

Thats absolutely rubbish. People are allowed to have their own opinions. Just because it isn't your opinion.

You are trying to implement Communism not Democracy.

And Charles Haley actually did it through George Sieffert's sunroof, so it actually was in the car.

I had always heard that it was a Mercedes 500 convertible and it was in the car too.......

point being....massive difference then wearing a hat.....

In the car, on the car.....what does it matter.....that is light years different then photo bombing a teammate...