Originally posted by Dshearn:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
He's the same age as Jimmy G. As a rookie lol and people still defend this pick. Sigh
come backs to the question.
What 4th round pick do you think is better then him?
You are only lying to yourself if you think he was anything other then above average.
Football outsiders, who track average punts from average distances, then compare performance based on field position ranked Mitch as the 7th best punter in the league.
I personally tend to rate "return yards" more in to effect, Mitch had very few returnable balls last year and was one of the hardest punters to return on last year, that plus his bias for putting a ball out of play makes me think he was closer to the 5th best punter in the league. But again, Football outsiders looks at what the average punter would do being set up as well as Mitch was. Mitch very much benefited from a strong offense getting him to mid field with regularity, so football outsiders compares to what the average punter would do on in similar situations. Then ranks ALL punters based on their performance on like punts.
Ill give them that, we tend to judge Mitch based on the whole of the team, but according to football outsiders, there are 6 other punters who could out perform him (mostly to a slight degree). When you factor slight degrees of separation from most of the top 5 performers with his rookie salary, and handling kick off duties..... yea.... Mitch was a great pick.
And he can tackle a returner when everyone else fails