Originally posted by irief:
You're right. No ones ever boomed kickoffs and punts….Oh wait, Pinion!
LOL. Pinion? Really? He is your comparison? Pro Bowl genius.
There are 151 users in the forums
Originally posted by irief:
You're right. No ones ever boomed kickoffs and punts….Oh wait, Pinion!
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
You do realize that only 1 from the NFC & AFC get selected, like with a FB, right? While only 2 for All Pro? So since Mitch, who has consistently been among the best with net punting, and punts inside the 20yd line but doesn't have an All Pro or Pro Bowl then he's a bust? LMAO, most of these awards are popularity contests, none of them are serious, take for fact that Joe Flacco winning Comeback POY, or Geno over CMC? These awards are laughable.
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
tbh i don't look at all punters in the league a ton, so who should be PB??, i'm looking more at SF. he's the best punter i've seen us have
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
tbh i don't look at all punters in the league a ton, so who should be PB??, i'm looking more at SF. he's the best punter i've seen us have
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
tbh i don't look at all punters in the league a ton, so who should be PB??, i'm looking more at SF. he's the best punter i've seen us have
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
Originally posted by irief:
You're right. No ones ever boomed kickoffs and punts….Oh wait, Pinion!
LOL. Pinion? Really? He is your comparison? Pro Bowl genius.
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
To be honest that position is situational and risk averse coaches don't let many of them show their diversity which Mitch has in spades.
Some of the younger and hungrier coaches throw them a bone and some of it pays off. Lions/Eagles for example. Maybe our new OC could weigh in this year?
There is no official measurement taken by the stats from the NFL that show hang time, field position (i.e. asking for a 30yd punt which brings their avg down but puts their inside 20 stat up), types of punts that cause fumbles, wind and altitude handicap, poor long snaps or punts from high pressure situations such as from their own end zone.
No, all the pundits are interested in is Punt Avg. as the key metric with few other things of note such as inside 10/20yd or touch back stats.
Mitch gave away some penalties, missed a tackle and had his team let him down as his only real blemishes in past few seasons. In a game of inches and in a winning side it is hard to get noticed. The Chief's former punter is an outlier IMO and even after being a world champion and pro bowl is now on another team because a newer, sexier and cheaper player is available.
Mitch will have his day.
I don't care for the big booming long punters because their punts have a higher risk/reward ratio than punters that statistically don't look as good like Mitch. And by stats I mean the ones reported on and not the ones the coaches want.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
McAfee it's easy to forget as he's a colorful personality now, but he was a punter in the NFL meaning, among the best on the planet at that job, he has off the charts respect for Wish and even did an insightful talk about how Andy Lee just bangs the ball, and Wish is doing a lot more than that, I like Lee but Wish is better no question about it
Originally posted by MrGriz:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
Originally posted by irief:
You're right. No ones ever boomed kickoffs and punts….Oh wait, Pinion!
LOL. Pinion? Really? He is your comparison? Pro Bowl genius.
why do you even bother conversing with that moron? It's a 2nd or 3rd or 12th account made specifically to troll the Wishnowsky thread. It has posted nowhere else. I understand how someone THAT dumb with THAT pathetic of a life is confusing - most of us never have to live like that. It reminds me a lot of working in the prison. You'll have a guy who is so dumb that he got caught doing something really stupid, but he acts like he's a lawyer telling everyone how to beat their charges.
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
tbh i don't look at all punters in the league a ton, so who should be PB??, i'm looking more at SF. he's the best punter i've seen us have
get the heck outta here
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
I like Mitch a lot, but Lee is definitely #1 and it's not even close as of now.
Your takes man....
Originally posted by GoreGoreGore:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by KeepRabbitsOut:
That would be 1 NFC pro bowl and 1 all pro per year possible, x 5 years he has played makes 10 failures to impress those that matter.
I was just backing up my good friend and generous poster of some repute on here with his claim that Mitch is a failure since he has no Pro Bowl thrown his way. AB you should never let common sense and proper analysis get in the way of a good story.
And of course as our good friend and brilliant mind has pointed out that there are incentives at stake for players/agents for these selections. And because this game is squeaky clean, there was never an incident of bribery for votes or pressure from NFL HQ or Vegas you must conclude that all these selections are legitimate.
tbh i don't look at all punters in the league a ton, so who should be PB??, i'm looking more at SF. he's the best punter i've seen us have
get the heck outta here
I like Mitch a lot, but Lee is definitely #1 and it's not even close as of now.
Your takes man....
Originally posted by Hysterikal: