Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 9erson3:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by 9erson3:
You knew this stuff coming with Brock. Paying high priced players and not on field will be the spotlight. Looking at injuries as a whole. Youth.
Brock is irrelevant to Greenlaw potentially not coming back. Completely irrelevant.
BS. We have holes to fill many places. Look at injuries, recurring and not. We have to pay Brock, fix OL. Do some defensive line work. Money doesn't grow on trees any longer. Look at a few other free agents.
This team needs to get younger even if fan feelings get hurt.
Brock's extension wouldnt kick in until 2026. We have the most capspace in the league. Our front office has stated many times they are prepared for Brock's extension. Greenlaw is coming off of a huge injury and only had a $9M cap hit in his last contract. Even if he gets a substantial raise (which would be interesting given the injury thing), his salary wouldnt be nearly enough to think that Brock's 2026 extension had anything to do with it.
A Brock extension wouldn't effect the cap until 2028, the first 3 yrs(2025-2027) would be in the $13M, $20M, & $25M cap number ranges, it'll be structured like Trevor Lawrence's deal is.
I don't think Dre is gone, I still see the 49ers keeping both Dre & Huf, letting Mooney & Banks walk, I think Dre is a top 10 off-ball LB, and he deserves a significant raise, and the 49ers CAN AFFORD him & Warner long term.
I agree we need Dre his leadership and dawg in him is infectious. Since we can afford him he should be kept with a competitive deal. But can we do a 1+1 deal so we protect the guarantees if there's future injury.
Huf i don't feel the same way. Not a good tackler and he's been taking bad angles.
Pappa thinks we will cut Hargrave then try to re sign him at a reduced rate, so maybe we can create this room for Dre without tapping into other needs.