Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
Mega derp
There are 174 users in the forums
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Armstead 10.5% I think last week Kinlaw was at 9.5%
We have like 4 IDL in the top 20 in pass rush win rate. No other defense in the league has that currently.
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Armstead 10.5% I think last week Kinlaw was at 9.5%
We have like 4 IDL in the top 20 in pass rush win rate. No other defense in the league has that currently.
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
This is only IL.
What is "PASS RUSH WIN RATE"?
We haven't had that many sacks the last couple of games right?
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
This is only IL.
What is "PASS RUSH WIN RATE"?
We haven't had that many sacks the last couple of games right?
Originally posted by 9ers4eva:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
This is only IL.
What is "PASS RUSH WIN RATE"?
We haven't had that many sacks the last couple of games right?
Lots of pressures though. Sacks don't tell a whole story.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Armstead 10.5% I think last week Kinlaw was at 9.5%
We have like 4 IDL in the top 20 in pass rush win rate. No other defense in the league has that currently.
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
This is only IL.
What is "PASS RUSH WIN RATE"?
We haven't had that many sacks the last couple of games right?
Yes. This is only the IDL. I'm pretty sure I stated that in my op.
This is pff's definition for pass rush win rate. "Percentage of "wins" vs Blocking on non-penalty Pass Rush Snaps".
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I'm not convinced. Im not sure our performance the last couple games passed the eye test for me.
Does the "win" have to be early enough to influence the throw?
Against the giants in the 4th quarter there were snaps where we had free rushers inside and you could see jones get the yips.
But I don't remember a lot besides that.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
I'm not convinced. Im not sure our performance the last couple games passed the eye test for me.
Does the "win" have to be early enough to influence the throw?
Against the giants in the 4th quarter there were snaps where we had free rushers inside and you could see jones get the yips.
But I don't remember a lot besides that.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Armstead 10.5% I think last week Kinlaw was at 9.5%
We have like 4 IDL in the top 20 in pass rush win rate. No other defense in the league has that currently.
Yes, but we're paying AA too much money to be having a Kinlaw type bad week.
This is only IL.
What is "PASS RUSH WIN RATE"?
We haven't had that many sacks the last couple of games right?
Yes. This is only the IDL. I'm pretty sure I stated that in my op.
This is pff's definition for pass rush win rate. "Percentage of "wins" vs Blocking on non-penalty Pass Rush Snaps".
I'm not convinced. Im not sure our performance the last couple games passed the eye test for me.
Does the "win" have to be early enough to influence the throw?
Against the giants in the 4th quarter there were snaps where we had free rushers inside and you could see jones get the yips.
But I don't remember a lot besides that.
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:
Where doe's Kinlaw line up in the 5 man line?
It's a tite front with double 3 techs. I like that this front allows the 49ers to force multiple one-on-ones inside, and with guys like Hargrave and Armstead, they're going to rack up a ton of pressures, sacks and QB hits.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:
Where doe's Kinlaw line up in the 5 man line?
It's a tite front with double 3 techs. I like that this front allows the 49ers to force multiple one-on-ones inside, and with guys like Hargrave and Armstead, they're going to rack up a ton of pressures, sacks and QB hits.
The one drawback is that it is very obvious to the offense what is about to happen - five DL rush, 5 in man coverage, one deep safety. But so far I think it's been all positive when the 49ers use this personnel.
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by ModestoNiner33:
Where doe's Kinlaw line up in the 5 man line?
It's a tite front with double 3 techs. I like that this front allows the 49ers to force multiple one-on-ones inside, and with guys like Hargrave and Armstead, they're going to rack up a ton of pressures, sacks and QB hits.
The one drawback is that it is very obvious to the offense what is about to happen - five DL rush, 5 in man coverage, one deep safety. But so far I think it's been all positive when the 49ers use this personnel.
Isn't this what PHI did a lot of last season?