Originally posted by TheRickestRick:
Originally posted by Heroism:
Originally posted by TheRickestRick:
The line didnt seem to be the biggest problem in the run D. Not an expert but the lineman seemed to shoot their gaps like they are supposed to but the LBs had the responsibility of reading 2 gaps... and either hesitated or guessed wrong. Probably just getting acclimated to new scheme responsibilities. But looking at the highlights, the LBs werent crashing gaps like in the past... seemed like they are tasked with the 2 gap responsibilities and just got ran over while trying to figure which gap to go for and caught flat footed rather than going downhill.
49ers play a 1-gap scheme across the board. This is from one of Kocurek's former players, who was responding to our very own NC after being asked about Kris Kocurek's scheme upon arrival to SF:
3) so the 2tech has to be EXTREMELY quick because he's almost at a disadvantage to the offensive guard to get cut out of his gap. So it's all one gap, no reading or 2 gapping! In the words of Kris Kocurek "read is a 4 letter word!"
— Andre Fluellen (@flu_dot_com) July 31, 2019
Does that address the linebackers? Just saying on those long runs the LBs seemed to be caught diagnosing the play so that the guards were already on top of them rather than running downhill. On a couple of those long runs you could see LBs jumping the wrong direction rather than filling the hole but flat footed all the same.
The linebackers gap only changes based upon the side the play is going to. For Example, Mike will usually have Strong side A and Weakside B, Will Weakside B or Weakside C, SAM strongside C or Strong side A
That's strong side run first, weakside run 2nd in gap listings.