SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS vs BALTIMORE RAVENS - Week 13 PREGAME

Originally posted by Rascal:

No, I am trying to tell you what John Harbaugh is trying to do with the type of personnel he has selected to build this team on. It is a physical power team. And so far, it has been working. They have blown out countless teams. And if you want to discard the Texans and Rams, they still smoked the Seahawks and Pats. It is what it is.

Did you watch the pats or Seahawks game? They led the pats 24-20 at the start of the 4th and 17-13 in the 4th vs Seattle (before a dk untouched fumble returned for a td). Neither of these games were blow outs.

Ravens have been really good the last few weeks but I think you are letting the last couple games cloud your opinion. Guess we will see Sunday!

I'm glad they played soft ass defenses the past two games, they won't be quite ready for the Niners. At all. Not even that Pats game would have prepared them for the Niner D. At least we faced 3 moblie QBs the past four games to get warmed up for Lamar...

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by Seattle49er:

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by 808niner4lyphe:

Originally posted by Rascal:

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by DonnieDarko:

Originally posted by Niners_D:
They love going heavy with their TEs....we loved going heavy with Davis and Walker...we are basically playing the Jim Harbaugh Niners.

with a better qb in jackson

but not that good of a defense.

3rd in Run D (9ers are 19th).

I think he meant overall defense. Not just Run D.

Lol. Some will only use the ones that only fits their narratives.

This isn't a "narrative". 3rd in Run D is a real thing when we find ourselves not being able to run on them. Watch the games, bro.

Lol, our defense is still better than theirs. End of discussion

Our defense doesn't play against their defense. LOL. End of discussion.

You sound just like Kittleskittle, nothin but negative Nancy b.s. If you're so worried don't watch the game. But don't sit here post after post trying to convince us that we're doomed.

Sooner or later someone is going to lay the smack down on RGIII 2.0 might as well be the 49ers. Personally I'd like to see a Chancellor vs VD hit on LJ, maybe that will bring him back to earth and get all these talking heads off his jock. Maybe then he can start using his head instead of just his braun. Sooner later he's going to get hurt, Harbaugh and the Ravens obviously don't care if they did they wouldn't continue to allow their starting QB to keep running like he does. Right now he's not costing them big money so what the F right?

Well, looks like you have answered your own question. But, John Harbaugh would be right. If you want to play a mobile QB, you have to let them do their thing and not try to mold them into a pocket passer. That is a no no. RG3 couldn't make that switch, nor could Kap for that matter. Jim Harbaugh did the wrong thing, he should have embraced mobile QB play to allow Kap to flourish.

Either way, it has nothing to do with being negative, it is what it is. Don't let emotions get the best of you. Is very simple, Vegas doesn't mess around, they are a money-making machine. Is only Tuesday, they have already upped the line from 49ers +4.5 to +6. And there is a very good reason for that.

I think both of you guys missed my point of the defense lol... I meant that the ravens defense isn't as good as our defense during the harbaugh/fangio years.

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Did you watch the pats or Seahawks game? They led the pats 24-20 at the start of the 4th and 17-13 in the 4th vs Seattle (before a dk untouched fumble returned for a td). Neither of these games were blow outs.

Ravens have been really good the last few weeks but I think you are letting the last couple games cloud your opinion. Guess we will see Sunday!

I watched the pats game and even though that was the score entering the fourth - baltimore did control that entire game. The pats have really struggled on offense this year though. We have a high scoring offense just like the ravens so I think we have a better chance of winning than the pats did.


It's just the weather that concerns me cause the ravens are built much better for a rainy game than we are

Originally posted by tankle104:

I watched the pats game and even though that was the score entering the fourth - baltimore did control that entire game. The pats have really struggled on offense this year though. We have a high scoring offense just like the ravens so I think we have a better chance of winning than the pats did.


It's just the weather that concerns me cause the ravens are built much better for a rainy game than we are

I dont think they're built for the weather any better than we are. Strong defense and running game. The rain might actually help slow Jackson down and we've already won a rainy game in the DMV.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by frenchmov:
Did you watch the pats or Seahawks game? They led the pats 24-20 at the start of the 4th and 17-13 in the 4th vs Seattle (before a dk untouched fumble returned for a td). Neither of these games were blow outs.

Ravens have been really good the last few weeks but I think you are letting the last couple games cloud your opinion. Guess we will see Sunday!

I watched the pats game and even though that was the score entering the fourth - baltimore did control that entire game. The pats have really struggled on offense this year though. We have a high scoring offense just like the ravens so I think we have a better chance of winning than the pats did.

It's just the weather that concerns me cause the ravens are built much better for a rainy game than we are

Very true. The speedy RBs and the outside runs will be difficult in wet conditions. Niners needs a bruiser. Sadly the Ravens have one in Ingram

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by Rascal:
No, I am trying to tell you what John Harbaugh is trying to do with the type of personnel he has selected to build this team on. It is a physical power team. And so far, it has been working. They have blown out countless teams. And if you want to discard the Texans and Rams, they still smoked the Seahawks and Pats. It is what it is.

Did you watch the pats or Seahawks game? They led the pats 24-20 at the start of the 4th and 17-13 in the 4th vs Seattle (before a dk untouched fumble returned for a td). Neither of these games were blow outs.

Ravens have been really good the last few weeks but I think you are letting the last couple games cloud your opinion. Guess we will see Sunday!

But, that is kind of like saying the 9ers beat the Cards by 10 when in fact the 9ers was still behind with only 39 secs to go. So, may be the Cards aren't that bad or the 9ers aren't that good at least when it comes to mobile QBs?

I don't know whether the last 2 games have clouded my judgement and I have already said I can only pray I am wrong. I totally welcome that, after all why would I want the 9ers to lose? A lot of people were worried about the Packers game and I was super relaxed, I have never been concerned about the Packers ever since Alex Smith beat them in the first regular season game in 2012. They are still the same, Rodgers throw too much and they are soft. But, hey different people look at teams differently. And for me? I am definitely concerned about the Ravens to put it mildly. Guess we will have to see on Sunday then.

Originally posted by Rascal:

But, that is kind of like saying the 9ers beat the Cards by 10 when in fact the 9ers was still behind with only 39 secs to go. So, may be the Cards aren't that bad or the 9ers aren't that good at least when it comes to mobile QBs?

I don't know whether the last 2 games have clouded my judgement and I have already said I can only pray I am wrong. I totally welcome that, after all why would I want the 9ers to lose? A lot of people were worried about the Packers game and I was super relaxed, I have never been concerned about the Packers ever since Alex Smith beat them in the first regular season game in 2012. They are still the same, Rodgers throw too much and they are soft. But, hey different people look at teams differently. And for me? I am definitely concerned about the Ravens to put it mildly. Guess we will have to see on Sunday then.

But we were talking about the ravens games. They weren't blowouts/smoked as you suggested.

As for me, I'm concerned with every game. This is the nfl and the majority of games come down to a handful of plays.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by frenchmov:
Did you watch the pats or Seahawks game? They led the pats 24-20 at the start of the 4th and 17-13 in the 4th vs Seattle (before a dk untouched fumble returned for a td). Neither of these games were blow outs.

Ravens have been really good the last few weeks but I think you are letting the last couple games cloud your opinion. Guess we will see Sunday!

I watched the pats game and even though that was the score entering the fourth - baltimore did control that entire game. The pats have really struggled on offense this year though. We have a high scoring offense just like the ravens so I think we have a better chance of winning than the pats did.

It's just the weather that concerns me cause the ravens are built much better for a rainy game than we are

Like that humidity was going to be a huge factor in Tampa at start of season. We practiced in heat to prepare

Perhaps we're already practicing on soaking wet grass

Their center is out...didn't matter against the Lambs, but on a rainy day, a rookie center could f**k up a snap here n there

Originally posted by LVJay:

Their center is out...didn't matter against the Lambs, but on a rainy day, a rookie center could f**k up a snap here n there

How much difference will it actually make? Remains to be seen but it seems like Jackson sure forces a s**t ton of missed tackles regardless of how the blocking is.

Originally posted by frenchmov:
But we were talking about the ravens games. They weren't blowouts/smoked as you suggested.

As for me, I'm concerned with every game. This is the nfl and the majority of games come down to a handful of plays.

You are concerned about every game? It certainly doesn't sound like it. If that is the case, why are we debating about the Ravens then if you were truly concerned? I mean after all you have been trying to shoot down every single one of my concerns right? I am confused. LOL.

Originally posted by ninerjok:

Originally posted by LVJay:
Their center is out...didn't matter against the Lambs, but on a rainy day, a rookie center could f**k up a snap here n there

How much difference will it actually make? Remains to be seen but it seems like Jackson sure forces a s**t ton of missed tackles regardless of how the blocking is.

Once the ball is in Lamar's hands, it should be secured, but if a bad snap causes a fumble...Niners need to cause some turnovers

Originally posted by 4919:

No under KS............he couldn't even accept a tie with Seahawks...........when his $137M QB couldn't move the ball by a couple of feet, and relied on a pedestrian kicker twice to save the team.....he saw the scary injury to Kittle......yet let him to play the Cardinal game to the last minute.

"When his $137m qb couldn't move the ball..." lol.
U think Rodgers, Brady, Brees , Wilson , Lamar would be able to move the ball without their 2 best pass catchers, their best offensive player, 2 out of shape recovering from injuries offensive tackles and 8 dropped passes?! Seems like some people don't even watch the games.

Originally posted by Pillbusta:

Originally posted by Seattle49er:

WHY ARE YOU HERE?

Trying to lock down that TOTY award

He's trying to end Sus's dynasty.