There are 152 users in the forums

SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS vs BALTIMORE RAVENS - Week 13 PREGAME

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 9ers4u:
So Ravens played Pat's, then 9ers, then Bills.

Gona have to give them props if they beat the top 3 defenses in the league.

Don't think they will but just saying.

Go 9ers!

After the Niners defense expose them this week, Buffalo will utilize the same gameplan and beat them next week. Book it!!!
  • LVJay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 27,847
Originally posted by Koldo:
Originally posted by rathman4481:
Hit him hard and hit him often.

Take him out of the game if you have to.

Actually, I wouldn't mind our D making LJ or Ingram miss the rest of the season. Those clowns are so full of themselves right now.

And Thomas...then as he gets carted off, cheat carroll pops out of nowhere to give him the middle finger, maybe in the tunnel
  • LVJay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 27,847
Originally posted by 9ers4u:
So Ravens played Pat's, then 9ers, then Bills.

Gona have to give them props if they beat the top 3 defenses in the league.

Don't think they will but just saying.

Go 9ers!

Rat Birds will lose their next two games
Originally posted by DJamhour:
Originally posted by Jeepzilla:
I totally agree with you.

My question is why haven't defenses been blasting LJ? That's what I don't understand.

Ive been posting this in this thread all week and No one can come up with an answer. Im clueless.. Theres plays ive seen all year where a DE will come in and just run in then stop and just contain from 3 yards away, and almost everytime lamar hands it off up the middle and the defender cant make a tackle on the RB anyways.. WHAT is the difference between that and hitting him every single time he holds that fake, and he hands it off to the RB anyways.. atleast this way Jackson and the Coaching staff will feel it everytime he gets hit and wont call it as much. HIT LAMAR JACKSON, No Not intentionally hurt but HIT him everytime he runs it.

Gotta make him pay on the fakes. And when he doesn't hand off...you're ready.
Originally posted by DJamhour:
Ive been posting this in this thread all week and No one can come up with an answer. Im clueless.. Theres plays ive seen all year where a DE will come in and just run in then stop and just contain from 3 yards away, and almost everytime lamar hands it off up the middle and the defender cant make a tackle on the RB anyways.. WHAT is the difference between that and hitting him every single time he holds that fake, and he hands it off to the RB anyways.. atleast this way Jackson and the Coaching staff will feel it everytime he gets hit and wont call it as much. HIT LAMAR JACKSON, No Not intentionally hurt but HIT him everytime he runs it.

This sounds good to me, but...When is it legal to hit him and when would refs be throwing a personal foul flag on us?
I can see a couple interceptions by our D this game... I think we gonna shake Lamar up some.
Originally posted by hello49:
Originally posted by DJamhour:
Ive been posting this in this thread all week and No one can come up with an answer. Im clueless.. Theres plays ive seen all year where a DE will come in and just run in then stop and just contain from 3 yards away, and almost everytime lamar hands it off up the middle and the defender cant make a tackle on the RB anyways.. WHAT is the difference between that and hitting him every single time he holds that fake, and he hands it off to the RB anyways.. atleast this way Jackson and the Coaching staff will feel it everytime he gets hit and wont call it as much. HIT LAMAR JACKSON, No Not intentionally hurt but HIT him everytime he runs it.

This sounds good to me, but...When is it legal to hit him and when would refs be throwing a personal foul flag on us?

On RPO when he's deciding to keep the ball or hand it to Ingram, if he does decide to hand to Ingram the DE can still crush him...as they should.

Personally I think the best way to play this is have the DE play Jackson every single time and have the other 10 men focus on stopping Ingram or the pass.

If you make the DE make a choice he will inevitably hesitate and take himself out of the play and potentially give up 25 to Lamar.
Originally posted by Rascal:
You are being over emotional again.

If you think we will lose this game, then there is nothing to argue about. It means we are in agreement, that's the bottom line.

But, just to get back to the point about people who think we managed to shut down Kyler Murray and challenging me on the fact that he only threw for 150 yards. Listen, there is a thing called efficiency, he had 2 TDs with 0 pic too and his QBR was in fact very high in that game.

And now we talk about Lamar Jackson, some say which I happen to agree on is that Kyler Murray is the poor man's version of Jackson, meaning Lamar Jackson is even more dynamic. So, let me illustrate the point about efficiency to you. Did you know, in that Rams complete beatdown, Lamar Jackson only threw for 169 yards? That is only 15 yards more than what Kyler Murray threw in our game. But, who the hell cares when he also scored 5 TDs right?? The dude only had 15 completions and 1/3 of them were TDs. LOL. It is this ridiculous.

So, just calm down. May be watch Rich Eisen's interview with MJD as they talk about the Ravens/Rams game and you will understand how objective I've been all along.


QBR is dumb stat that ESPN invented.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by Niners99:
Originally posted by Rascal:
You are being over emotional again.

If you think we will lose this game, then there is nothing to argue about. It means we are in agreement, that's the bottom line.

But, just to get back to the point about people who think we managed to shut down Kyler Murray and challenging me on the fact that he only threw for 150 yards. Listen, there is a thing called efficiency, he had 2 TDs with 0 pic too and his QBR was in fact very high in that game.

And now we talk about Lamar Jackson, some say which I happen to agree on is that Kyler Murray is the poor man's version of Jackson, meaning Lamar Jackson is even more dynamic. So, let me illustrate the point about efficiency to you. Did you know, in that Rams complete beatdown, Lamar Jackson only threw for 169 yards? That is only 15 yards more than what Kyler Murray threw in our game. But, who the hell cares when he also scored 5 TDs right?? The dude only had 15 completions and 1/3 of them were TDs. LOL. It is this ridiculous.

So, just calm down. May be watch Rich Eisen's interview with MJD as they talk about the Ravens/Rams game and you will understand how objective I've been all along.


QBR is dumb stat that ESPN invented.

I swear I thought we won both games against Arizona. What am I missing?
Originally posted by Giedi:
Personally, between injuries and turnovers, I'll take turnovers. Strip sacks, hits creating fumbles, etc....

I don't think trying to hurt Lamar is a viable strategy. Nevermind that it's against the rules, it's more a practical matter of trying to catch a squirrel. It's not easy to catch a squirrel and if your strategy is to hurt a squirrel, good luck, because you'll be in for a long day. There are other more viable strategies out there that would actually work against a squirrel.

One guy put food in the middle of the forest. It drew a whole bunch of animals. He'd put up a part of a wall. Then he'd continue to build a circular wall around the food every day for 30 days. One day, one piece of wall, and so at night the animals would still come in to the clearing and eat the food. Slowly the walls kept gradually closing until the last day, he put food in the clearing, the animals came, and he quietly nailed the last peice of fencing. Dude caught a lot of animals that day - a lot of them much bigger, faster and stronger than squirrels, and didn't have to struggle too much to do it either.

Same thing with Lamar, if we can get a lead, and keep it, they will panic and try to pass right into the teeth of the best pass rush in the NFL.

Huh? Walls animals and squirrels? Did I just become dumber by reading this? Durrrrr durrr GO NINERS!
d

San Francisco 49ers

20.3K Subscribers
POWERED BY
No Upcoming Events
Add to Calendar and you'll be the first to know when new events are announced.
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by Niners99:
QBR is dumb stat that ESPN invented.

Alright, no problem, forget about QBR.

How about 169 yards off only 15 completions, but 5 of those completions were TDs?? LOL.
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by Giedi:
I swear I thought we won both games against Arizona. What am I missing?

What you are missing on is the 9ers were in fact still trailing behind with only 39 secs left on the clock. And we are talking about a team that is last in NFC West with a losing record. And now, we have to deal with a 9-2 Ravens team with an even more dynamic mobile QB who has blown out multiple teams including quality opponents.
  • Rascal
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 13,926
Originally posted by 9ers4u:
So Ravens played Pat's, then 9ers, then Bills.

Gona have to give them props if they beat the top 3 defenses in the league.

Don't think they will but just saying.

Go 9ers!

They beat the Seahawks too, by 14.

They also scored 45 on the Rams when we only managed 20.
FFS
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,368
Originally posted by Rascal:
Originally posted by Giedi:
I swear I thought we won both games against Arizona. What am I missing?

What you are missing on is the 9ers were in fact still trailing behind with only 39 secs left on the clock. And we are talking about a team that is last in NFC West with a losing record. And now, we have to deal with a 9-2 Ravens team with an even more dynamic mobile QB who has blown out multiple teams including quality opponents.


What you really are saying is that we got *no chance* at winning this game. That's just as idiotic as saying we got a 100% chance to win. Sorry, I ain't buying what you are selling.
Theme: Auto • LightDark
Search Share 49ersWebzone